19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Marine Paleoseismic Evidence for Seismic and Aseismic Slip Along the Hayward‐Rodgers Creek Fault System in Northern San Pablo Bay

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Distinguishing between seismic and aseismic fault slip in the geologic record is difficult, yet fundamental to estimating the seismic potential of faults and the likelihood of multi‐fault ruptures. We integrated chirp sub‐bottom imaging with targeted cross‐fault coring and core analyses of sedimentary proxy data to characterize vertical deformation and slip behavior within an extensional fault bend along the Hayward‐Rodgers Creek fault system in northern San Pablo Bay. We identified and traced four key seismic horizons (R1–R4), all younger than approximately 1400 CE, that cross the fault and extend throughout the basin. A stratigraphic age model was developed using detailed down‐core radiocarbon and radioisotope dating combined with measurements of anthropogenic metal concentrations. The onset of hydraulic mining within the Sierra Nevada in 1852 CE left a clear geochemical and magnetic signature within core samples. This key time horizon was used to calculate a local reservoir correction and reduce uncertainty in radiocarbon age calibration and models. Vertical fault offset of strata younger than the most recent surface‐rupturing earthquake on the Hayward fault in 1868 CE suggest near‐surface vertical creep is occurring along the fault in northern San Pablo Bay at a rate of approximately 0.4 mm/yr. In addition, we present evidence of at least one and possibly two coseismic events associated with growth strata above horizons R1 and R2, with median event ages estimated to be 1400 CE and 1800 CE, respectively. The timing of both these events overlaps with paleoseismic events on adjacent fault sections, suggesting the possibility of multi‐fault rupture.

          Key Points

          • Onset of hydraulic mining deposition in 1852 CE is key to unraveling northern Hayward fault earthquake history

          • Near‐surface aseismic creep detected along the Hayward fault in northern San Pablo Bay

          • Record of two coseismic or triggered slip events provide insight into the potential for multi‐fault rupture in the San Francisco Bay Area

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Modeling Atmospheric 14C Influences and 14C Ages of Marine Samples to 10,000 BC

          The detailed radiocarbon agevs.calibrated (cal) age studies of tree rings reported in this Calibration Issue provide a unique data set for precise14C age calibration of materials formed in isotopic equilibrium with atmospheric CO2. The situation is more complex for organisms formed in other reservoirs, such as lakes and oceans. Here the initial specific14C activity may differ from that of the contemporaneous atmosphere. The measured remaining14C activity of samples formed in such reservoirs not only reflects14C decay (related to sample age) but also the reservoir14C activity. As the measured sample14C activity figures into the calculation of a conventional14C age (Stuiver & Polach 1977), apparent14C age differences occur when contemporaneously grown samples of different reservoirs are dated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dealing with Outliers and Offsets in Radiocarbon Dating

            The wide availability of precise radiocarbon dates has allowed researchers in a number of disciplines to address chronological questions at a resolution which was not possible 10 or 20 years ago. The use of Bayesian statistics for the analysis of groups of dates is becoming a common way to integrate all of the14C evidence together. However, the models most often used make a number of assumptions that may not always be appropriate. In particular, there is an assumption that all of the14C measurements are correct in their context and that the original14C concentration of the sample is properly represented by the calibration curve.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              MARINE20—THE MARINE RADIOCARBON AGE CALIBRATION CURVE (0–55,000 CAL BP)

              The concentration of radiocarbon ( 14 C) differs between ocean and atmosphere. Radiocarbon determinations from samples which obtained their 14 C in the marine environment therefore need a marine-specific calibration curve and cannot be calibrated directly against the atmospheric-based IntCal20 curve. This paper presents Marine20, an update to the internationally agreed marine radiocarbon age calibration curve that provides a non-polar global-average marine record of radiocarbon from 0–55 cal kBP and serves as a baseline for regional oceanic variation. Marine20 is intended for calibration of marine radiocarbon samples from non-polar regions; it is not suitable for calibration in polar regions where variability in sea ice extent, ocean upwelling and air-sea gas exchange may have caused larger changes to concentrations of marine radiocarbon. The Marine20 curve is based upon 500 simulations with an ocean/atmosphere/biosphere box-model of the global carbon cycle that has been forced by posterior realizations of our Northern Hemispheric atmospheric IntCal20 14 C curve and reconstructed changes in CO 2 obtained from ice core data. These forcings enable us to incorporate carbon cycle dynamics and temporal changes in the atmospheric 14 C level. The box-model simulations of the global-average marine radiocarbon reservoir age are similar to those of a more complex three-dimensional ocean general circulation model. However, simplicity and speed of the box model allow us to use a Monte Carlo approach to rigorously propagate the uncertainty in both the historic concentration of atmospheric 14 C and other key parameters of the carbon cycle through to our final Marine20 calibration curve. This robust propagation of uncertainty is fundamental to providing reliable precision for the radiocarbon age calibration of marine based samples. We make a first step towards deconvolving the contributions of different processes to the total uncertainty; discuss the main differences of Marine20 from the previous age calibration curve Marine13; and identify the limitations of our approach together with key areas for further work. The updated values for ΔR , the regional marine radiocarbon reservoir age corrections required to calibrate against Marine20, can be found at the data base http://calib.org/marine/ .
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
                Geochem Geophys Geosyst
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                1525-2027
                1525-2027
                January 2022
                December 30 2021
                January 2022
                : 23
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ] U.S. Geological Survey Santa Cruz CA USA
                Article
                10.1029/2021GC010180
                6151dac9-8bb0-43ea-bfd0-52d4e50a4aab
                © 2022

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article