105
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      How Structural Racism Works — Racist Policies as a Root Cause of U.S. Racial Health Inequities

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions

          The Lancet, 389(10077), 1453-1463
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Racism and Health: Evidence and Needed Research

            In recent decades, there has been remarkable growth in scientific research examining the multiple ways in which racism can adversely affect health. This interest has been driven in part by the striking persistence of racial/ethnic inequities in health and the empirical evidence that indicates that socioeconomic factors alone do not account for racial/ethnic inequities in health. Racism is considered a fundamental cause of adverse health outcomes for racial/ethnic minorities and racial/ethnic inequities in health. This article provides an overview of the evidence linking the primary domains of racism—structural racism, cultural racism, and individual-level discrimination—to mental and physical health outcomes. For each mechanism, we describe key findings and identify priorities for future research. We also discuss evidence for interventions to reduce racism and describe research needed to advance knowledge in this area.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites.

              Black Americans are systematically undertreated for pain relative to white Americans. We examine whether this racial bias is related to false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites (e.g., "black people's skin is thicker than white people's skin"). Study 1 documented these beliefs among white laypersons and revealed that participants who more strongly endorsed false beliefs about biological differences reported lower pain ratings for a black (vs. white) target. Study 2 extended these findings to the medical context and found that half of a sample of white medical students and residents endorsed these beliefs. Moreover, participants who endorsed these beliefs rated the black (vs. white) patient's pain as lower and made less accurate treatment recommendations. Participants who did not endorse these beliefs rated the black (vs. white) patient's pain as higher, but showed no bias in treatment recommendations. These findings suggest that individuals with at least some medical training hold and may use false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites to inform medical judgments, which may contribute to racial disparities in pain assessment and treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                New England Journal of Medicine
                N Engl J Med
                Massachusetts Medical Society
                0028-4793
                1533-4406
                December 16 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]From the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami (Z.D.B.); and the FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard University, Boston (J.M.F., M.T.B.).
                Article
                10.1056/NEJMms2025396
                33326717
                610aa3d9-761e-41de-baf1-e36bd02bc36b
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article