8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Emergency Department to ICU Time Is Associated With Hospital Mortality: A Registry Analysis of 14,788 Patients From Six University Hospitals in The Netherlands*

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

          Objectives:

          Prolonged emergency department to ICU waiting time may delay intensive care treatment, which could negatively affect patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether emergency department to ICU time is associated with hospital mortality.

          Design, Setting, and Patients:

          We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using data from the Dutch quality registry National Intensive Care Evaluation. Adult patients admitted to the ICU directly from the emergency department in six university hospitals, between 2009 and 2016, were included. Using a logistic regression model, we investigated the crude and adjusted (for disease severity; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV probability) odds ratios of emergency department to ICU time on mortality. In addition, we assessed whether the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV probability modified the effect of emergency department to ICU time on mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU, 30-day, and 90-day mortality.

          Interventions:

          None.

          Measurements and Main Results:

          A total of 14,788 patients were included. The median emergency department to ICU time was 2.0 hours (interquartile range, 1.3–3.3 hr). Emergency department to ICU time was correlated to adjusted hospital mortality ( p < 0.002), in particular in patients with the highest Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV probability and long emergency department to ICU time quintiles: odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.02–1.64 (2.4–3.7 hr) and odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.11–2.14 (> 3.7 hr), both compared with the reference category (< 1.2 hr). For 30-day and 90-day mortality, we found similar results. However, emergency department to ICU time was not correlated to adjusted ICU mortality ( p = 0.20).

          Conclusions:

          Prolonged emergency department to ICU time (> 2.4 hr) is associated with increased hospital mortality after ICU admission, mainly driven by patients who had a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV probability. We hereby provide evidence that rapid admission of the most critically ill patients to the ICU might reduce hospital mortality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Impact of delayed admission to intensive care units on mortality of critically ill patients: a cohort study

          Introduction When the number of patients who require intensive care is greater than the number of beds available, intensive care unit (ICU) entry flow is obstructed. This phenomenon has been associated with higher mortality rates in patients that are not admitted despite their need, and in patients that are admitted but are waiting for a bed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if a delay in ICU admission affects mortality for critically ill patients. Methods A prospective cohort of adult patients admitted to the ICU of our institution between January and December 2005 were analyzed. Patients for whom a bed was available were immediately admitted; when no bed was available, patients waited for ICU admission. ICU admission was classified as either delayed or immediate. Confounding variables examined were: age, sex, originating hospital ward, ICU diagnosis, co-morbidity, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, therapeutic intervention, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. All patients were followed until hospital discharge. Results A total of 401 patients were evaluated; 125 (31.2%) patients were immediately admitted and 276 (68.8%) patients had delayed admission. There was a significant increase in ICU mortality rates with a delay in ICU admission (P = 0.002). The fraction of mortality risk attributable to ICU delay was 30% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.2% to 44.8%). Each hour of waiting was independently associated with a 1.5% increased risk of ICU death (hazard ratio (HR): 1.015; 95% CI 1.006 to 1.023; P = 0.001). Conclusions There is a significant association between time to admission and survival rates. Early admission to the ICU is more likely to produce positive outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Modern triage in the emergency department.

            Because the volume of patient admissions to an emergency department (ED) cannot be precisely planned, the available resources may become overwhelmed at times ("crowding"), with resulting risks for patient safety. The aim of this study is to identify modern triage instruments and assess their validity and reliability. Review of selected literature retrieved by a search on the terms "emergency department" and "triage." Emergency departments around the world use different triage systems to assess the severity of incoming patients' conditions and assign treatment priorities. Our study identified four such instruments: the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS), the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), the Manchester Triage System (MTS), and the Emergency Severity Index (ESI). Triage instruments with 5 levels are superior to those with 3 levels in both validity and reliability (p<0.01). Good to very good reliability has been shown for the best-studied instruments, CTAS and ESI (κ-statistics: 0.7 to 0.95), while ATS and MTS have been found to be only moderately reliable (κ-statistics: 0.3 to 0.6). MTS and ESI are both available in German; of these two, only the ESI has been validated in German-speaking countries. Five-level triage systems are valid and reliable methods for assessment of the severity of incoming patients' conditions by nursing staff in the emergency department. They should be used in German emergency departments to assign treatment priorities in a structured and dependable fashion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions

              C.P. Subbe (2001)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Crit Care Med
                Crit. Care Med
                CCM
                Critical Care Medicine
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                0090-3493
                1530-0293
                November 2019
                11 October 2019
                : 47
                : 11
                : 1564-1571
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
                [2 ]Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
                [3 ]National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
                [4 ]Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
                [5 ]Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
                [6 ]Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
                [7 ]Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
                [8 ]Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
                [9 ]Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
                Author notes
                For information regarding this article, E-mail: c.groenland@ 123456erasmusmc.nl
                Article
                00012
                10.1097/CCM.0000000000003957
                6798749
                31393321
                5fd4d8ea-9fae-4c78-ac49-948cd295937e
                Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Categories
                Clinical Investigations
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                critically ill,emergency department,intensive care unit,length of stay,mortality

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Cited by28

                Most referenced authors271