From CD16a Biology to Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity Improvement

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies are showing great promise in the treatment of cancer, particularly B-cell malignancies, but are associated with characteristic, potentially fatal toxicities, principally cytokine-release syndrome, CAR-T-cell-related encephalopathy syndrome, and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage-activation syndrome. Herein, the CAR-T-cell-therapy-associated TOXicity (CARTOX) Working Group, comprising multidisciplinary investigators from various institutions with clinical experience in the use of a range of CAR-T-cell platforms, review these acute toxicities and provide monitoring, grading, and management recommendations.

It has been more than three decades since the first monoclonal antibody was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) in 1986, and during this time, antibody engineering has dramatically evolved. Current antibody drugs have increasingly fewer adverse effects due to their high specificity. As a result, therapeutic antibodies have become the predominant class of new drugs developed in recent years. Over the past five years, antibodies have become the best-selling drugs in the pharmaceutical market, and in 2018, eight of the top ten bestselling drugs worldwide were biologics. The global therapeutic monoclonal antibody market was valued at approximately US$115.2 billion in 2018 and is expected to generate revenue of $150 billion by the end of 2019 and $300 billion by 2025. Thus, the market for therapeutic antibody drugs has experienced explosive growth as new drugs have been approved for treating various human diseases, including many cancers, autoimmune, metabolic and infectious diseases. As of December 2019, 79 therapeutic mAbs have been approved by the US FDA, but there is still significant growth potential. This review summarizes the latest market trends and outlines the preeminent antibody engineering technologies used in the development of therapeutic antibody drugs, such as humanization of monoclonal antibodies, phage display, the human antibody mouse, single B cell antibody technology, and affinity maturation. Finally, future applications and perspectives are also discussed.

Distinct genes encode 6 human receptors for IgG (hFcgammaRs), 3 of which have 2 or 3 polymorphic variants. The specificity and affinity of individual hFcgammaRs for the 4 human IgG subclasses is unknown. This information is critical for antibody-based immunotherapy which has been increasingly used in the clinics. We investigated the binding of polyclonal and monoclonal IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 to FcgammaRI; FcgammaRIIA, IIB, and IIC; FcgammaRIIIA and IIIB; and all known polymorphic variants. Wild-type and low-fucosylated IgG1 anti-CD20 and anti-RhD mAbs were also examined. We found that (1) IgG1 and IgG3 bind to all hFcgammaRs; (2) IgG2 bind not only to FcgammaRIIA(H131), but also, with a lower affinity, to FcgammaRIIA(R131) and FcgammaRIIIA(V158); (3) IgG4 bind to FcgammaRI, FcgammaRIIA, IIB and IIC and FcgammaRIIIA(V158); and (4) the inhibitory receptor FcgammaRIIB has a lower affinity for IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3 than all other hFcgammaRs. We also identified parameters that determine the specificity and affinity of hFcgammaRs for IgG subclasses. These results document how hFcgammaR specificity and affinity may account for the biological activities of antibodies. They therefore highlight the role of specific hFcgammaRs in the therapeutic and pathogenic effects of antibodies in disease.