47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Targeting impulsivity in Parkinson’s disease using atomoxetine

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study, Kehagia et al. investigate the effects of a single dose of atomoxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, in 25 patients with Parkinson’s disease. Consistent with the presence of a longstanding noradrenergic deficit, atomoxetine improved stopping accuracy, and reduced reflection impulsivity during decision making.

          Abstract

          Noradrenergic dysfunction may play a significant role in cognition in Parkinson’s disease due to the early degeneration of the locus coeruleus. Converging evidence from patient and animal studies points to the role of noradrenaline in dopaminergically insensitive aspects of the parkinsonian dysexecutive syndrome, yet the direct effects of noradrenergic enhancement have not to date been addressed. Our aim was to directly investigate these, focusing on impulsivity during response inhibition and decision making. To this end, we administered 40 mg atomoxetine, a selective noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor to 25 patients with Parkinson’s disease (12 female /13 male; 64.4 ± 6.9 years old) in a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled design. Patients completed an extensive battery of neuropsychological tests addressing response inhibition, decision-making, attention, planning and verbal short term memory. Atomoxetine improved stopping accuracy on the Stop Signal Task [ F(1,19) = 4.51, P = 0.047] and reduced reflection impulsivity [ F(1,9) = 7.86, P = 0.02] and risk taking [ F(1,9) = 9.2, P = 0.01] in the context of gambling. The drug also conferred effects on performance as a function of its measured blood plasma concentration: it reduced reflection impulsivity during information sampling [adjusted R 2 = 0.23, F(1,16) = 5.83, P = 0.03] and improved problem solving on the One Touch Stockings of Cambridge [adjusted R 2 = 0.29, F(1,17) = 8.34, P = 0.01]. It also enhanced target sensitivity during sustained attention [ F(1,9) = 5.33, P = 0.046]. The results of this exploratory study represent the basis of specific predictions in future investigations on the effects of atomoxetine in Parkinson’s disease and support the hypothesis that targeting noradrenergic dysfunction may represent a new parallel avenue of therapy in some of the cognitive and behavioural deficits seen in the disorder.

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Varieties of impulsivity.

          J Evenden (1999)
          The concept of impulsivity covers a wide range of "actions that are poorly conceived, prematurely expressed, unduly risky, or inappropriate to the situation and that often result in undesirable outcomes". As such it plays an important role in normal behaviour, as well as, in a pathological form, in many kinds of mental illness such as mania, personality disorders, substance abuse disorders and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Although evidence from psychological studies of human personality suggests that impulsivity may be made up of several independent factors, this has not made a major impact on biological studies of impulsivity. This may be because there is little unanimity as to which these factors are. The present review summarises evidence for varieties of impulsivity from several different areas of research: human psychology, psychiatry and animal behaviour. Recently, a series of psychopharmacological studies has been carried out by the present author and colleagues using methods proposed to measure selectively different aspects of impulsivity. The results of these studies suggest that several neurochemical mechanisms can influence impulsivity, and that impulsive behaviour has no unique neurobiological basis. Consideration of impulsivity as the result of several different, independent factors which interact to modulate behaviour may provide better insight into the pathology than current hypotheses based on serotonergic underactivity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neuropsychological and clinical heterogeneity of cognitive impairment and dementia in patients with Parkinson's disease.

            Cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease is gaining increased clinical significance owing to the relative success of therapeutic approaches to the motor symptoms of this disorder. Early investigations contributed to the concept of subcortical dementia associated with bradyphrenia and cognitive rigidity. For cognition in parkinsonian disorders, this notion developed into the concept of mild cognitive impairment and fronto-executive dysfunction in particular, driven mainly by dopaminergic dysmodulation and manifesting as deficits in flexibility, planning, working memory, and reinforcement learning. However, patients with Parkinson's disease could also develop a syndrome of dementia that might depend on non-dopaminergic, cholinergic cortical dysfunction. Recent findings, supplemented by advances in neuroimaging and genetic research, reveal substantial heterogeneity in the range of cognitive deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease. Remediation and management prospects for these cognitive deficits are based on neuropharmacological and cognitive rehabilitation approaches. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The neuropsychopharmacology of fronto-executive function: monoaminergic modulation.

              We review the modulatory effects of the catecholamine neurotransmitters noradrenaline and dopamine on prefrontal cortical function. The effects of pharmacologic manipulations of these systems, sometimes in comparison with the indoleamine serotonin (5-HT), on performance on a variety of tasks that tap working memory, attentional-set formation and shifting, reversal learning, and response inhibition are compared in rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans using, in a behavioral context, several techniques ranging from microiontophoresis and single-cell electrophysiological recording to pharmacologic functional magnetic resonance imaging. Dissociable effects of drugs and neurotoxins affecting these monoamine systems suggest new ways of conceptualizing state-dependent fronto-executive functions, with implications for understanding the molecular genetic basis of mental illness and its treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain
                Brain
                brainj
                brain
                Brain
                Oxford University Press
                0006-8950
                1460-2156
                July 2014
                03 June 2014
                03 June 2014
                : 137
                : 7
                : 1986-1997
                Affiliations
                1 Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
                2 Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
                3 Cambridge Cognition Limited, Cambridge, UK
                4 Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
                5 Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Rudolf-Boehm-Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Leipzig, Germany
                6 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
                7 Adult ADHD Service, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, UK
                8 MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
                9 Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Angie A. Kehagia, Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, PO89, London SE5 8AF, UK. E-mail: angie.kehagia@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                awu117
                10.1093/brain/awu117
                4065022
                24893708
                5fcae052-5ee6-421d-8182-7d3c32beaaa8
                © The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 November 2013
                : 10 March 2014
                : 31 March 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article