12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Selfie consents, remote rapport, and Zoom debriefings: collecting qualitative data amid a pandemic in four resource-constrained settings

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In-person interactions have traditionally been the gold standard for qualitative data collection. The COVID-19 pandemic required researchers to consider if remote data collection can meet research objectives, while retaining the same level of data quality and participant protections. We use four case studies from the Philippines, Zambia, India and Uganda to assess the challenges and opportunities of remote data collection during COVID-19. We present lessons learned that may inform practice in similar settings, as well as reflections for the field of qualitative inquiry in the post-COVID-19 era. Key challenges and strategies to overcome them included the need for adapted researcher training in the use of technologies and consent procedures, preparation for abbreviated interviews due to connectivity concerns, and the adoption of regular researcher debriefings. Participant outreach to allay suspicions ranged from communicating study information through multiple channels to highlighting associations with local institutions to boost credibility. Interviews were largely successful, and contained a meaningful level of depth, nuance and conviction that allowed teams to meet study objectives. Rapport still benefitted from conventional interviewer skills, including attentiveness and fluency with interview guides. While differently abled populations may encounter different barriers, the included case studies, which varied in geography and aims, all experienced more rapid recruitment and robust enrollment. Reduced in-person travel lowered interview costs and increased participation among groups who may not have otherwise attended. In our view, remote data collection is not a replacement for in-person endeavours, but a highly beneficial complement. It may increase accessibility and equity in participant contributions and lower costs, while maintaining rich data collection in multiple study target populations and settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Naturalistic inquiry

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants

              Advances in communication technologies offer new opportunities for the conduct of qualitative research. Among these, Zoom—an innovative videoconferencing platform—has a number of unique features that enhance its potential appeal to qualitative and mixed-methods researchers. Although studies have explored the use of information and communication technologies for conducting research, few have explored both researcher and participant perspectives on the use of web and videoconferencing platforms. Further, data are lacking on the benefits and challenges of using Zoom as a data collection method. In this study, we explore the feasibility and acceptability of using Zoom to collect qualitative interview data within a health research context in order to better understand its suitability for qualitative and mixed-methods researchers. We asked 16 practice nurses who participated in online qualitative interviews about their experiences of using Zoom and concurrently recorded researcher observations. Although several participants experienced technical difficulties, most described their interview experience as highly satisfactory and generally rated Zoom above alternative interviewing mediums such as face-to-face, telephone, and other videoconferencing services, platforms, and products. Findings suggest the viability of Zoom as a tool for collection of qualitative data because of its relative ease of use, cost-effectiveness, data management features, and security options. Further research exploring the utility of Zoom is recommended in order to critically assess and advance innovations in online methods.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Glob Health
                BMJ Glob Health
                bmjgh
                bmjgh
                BMJ Global Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2059-7908
                2021
                8 January 2021
                : 6
                : 1
                : e004193
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentHeidelberg Institute of Global Health , Ruprechts-Karls-Universität Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Germany
                [2 ]departmentDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics , Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Department of Health , Manila, Philippines
                [3 ]departmentOn behalf of the Social & Behavioural Science Group , Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia , Lusaka, Zambia
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of International Health , Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                [5 ]Johns Hopkins India Private Limited (JHIPL) , Delhi, India
                [6 ]departmentOn behalf of the Social & Behavioral Sciences Team , The Rakai Health Sciences Program , Rakai, Uganda
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Shannon A McMahon; mcmahon@ 123456uni-heidelberg.de
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7414-7174
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8634-9283
                Article
                bmjgh-2020-004193
                10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004193
                7798410
                33419929
                5ebd8b40-11fd-4e4c-b334-ebf486796e5e
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 13 October 2020
                : 26 November 2020
                : 03 December 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007855, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: OPP1217275
                Funded by: Vittol Foundation;
                Funded by: The Johns Hopkins Catalyst Awards;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: T32 MH103210
                Funded by: National Institute of Health;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000030, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;
                Funded by: Johns Hopkins Alliance for A Healthier World;
                Funded by: UCSF Gladstone;
                Categories
                Practice
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                qualitative study,public health,health policies and all other topics,study design

                Comments

                Comment on this article