114
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prognostic value of Dicer expression in human breast cancers and association with the mesenchymal phenotype

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Dicer, a ribonuclease, is the key enzyme required for the biogenesis of microRNAs and small interfering RNAs and is essential for both mammalian development and cell differentiation. Recent evidence indicates that Dicer may also be involved in tumourigenesis. However, no studies have examined the clinical significance of Dicer at both the RNA and the protein levels in breast cancer.

          Methods:

          In this study, the biological and prognostic value of Dicer expression was assessed in breast cancer cell lines, breast cancer progression cellular models, and in two well-characterised sets of breast carcinoma samples obtained from patients with long-term follow-up using tissue microarrays and quantitative reverse transcription–PCR.

          Results:

          We have found that Dicer protein expression is significantly associated with hormone receptor status and cancer subtype in breast tumours (ER P=0.008; PR P=0.019; cancer subtype P=0.023, luminal A P=0.0174). Dicer mRNA expression appeared to have an independent prognostic impact in metastatic disease (hazard ratio=3.36, P=0.0032). In the breast cancer cell lines, lower Dicer expression was found in cells harbouring a mesenchymal phenotype and in metastatic bone derivatives of a breast cancer cell line. These findings suggest that the downregulation of Dicer expression may be related to the metastatic spread of tumours.

          Conclusion:

          Assessment of Dicer expression may facilitate prediction of distant metastases for patients suffering from breast cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dicer is essential for mouse development.

          To address the biological function of RNA interference (RNAi)-related pathways in mammals, we disrupted the gene Dicer1 in mice. Loss of Dicer1 lead to lethality early in development, with Dicer1-null embryos depleted of stem cells. Coupled with our inability to generate viable Dicer1-null embryonic stem (ES) cells, this suggests a role for Dicer, and, by implication, the RNAi machinery, in maintaining the stem cell population during early mouse development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impaired microRNA processing enhances cellular transformation and tumorigenesis.

            MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a new class of small noncoding RNAs that post-transcriptionally regulate the expression of target mRNA transcripts. Many of these target mRNA transcripts are involved in proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, processes commonly altered during tumorigenesis. Recent work has shown a global decrease of mature miRNA expression in human cancers. However, it is unclear whether this global repression of miRNAs reflects the undifferentiated state of tumors or causally contributes to the transformed phenotype. Here we show that global repression of miRNA maturation promotes cellular transformation and tumorigenesis. Cancer cells expressing short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) targeting three different components of the miRNA processing machinery showed a substantial decrease in steady-state miRNA levels and a more pronounced transformed phenotype. In animals, miRNA processing-impaired cells formed tumors with accelerated kinetics. These tumors were more invasive than control tumors, suggesting that global miRNA loss enhances tumorigenesis. Furthermore, conditional deletion of Dicer1 enhanced tumor development in a K-Ras-induced mouse model of lung cancer. Overall, these studies indicate that abrogation of global miRNA processing promotes tumorigenesis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Selective events in the metastatic process defined by analysis of the sequential dissemination of subpopulations of a mouse mammary tumor.

              To identify selective steps in metastasis, those that eliminate nonmetastatic tumor cells more efficiently than metastatic cells, we have evaluated the sequential dissemination of tumor cells from a mammary fatpad, using both metastatic (4T1 and 66cl4) and nonmetastatic (67NR, 168FARN, and 4TO7) subpopulations of a single mouse mammary tumor. Each of these variant subpopulations is resistant to one or more selective drugs so they could be quantitatively identified by colony formation in selective media. We found that the 2 metastatic cell lines metastasized by different routes and that the nonmetastatic tumor cell lines failed at different points in dissemination. Line 67NR did not leave the primary site; clonogenic tumor cells were not detected in the nodes, blood, or lungs during the experiment (7 weeks). Tumor line 168FARN disseminated from the primary tumor because clonogenic cells were cultured from the draining lymph nodes throughout the experiment. However, dissemination essentially stopped in the node as cells were rarely isolated from blood, lungs, or lives. Whether 168FARN cells failed to reach these tissues or were killed very rapidly after traversing the lymph node is unknown. Line 4TO7 cells disseminated via the blood and were consistently recovered from lungs by day 19 but failed to proliferate. This panel of 5 subpopulations thus identifies different points of selective failure in tumor cell dissemination and should be valuable in the assessment of antimetastatic therapies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                11 August 2009
                18 August 2009
                : 101
                : 4
                : 673-683
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, ISPB Lyon, F-69003, France
                [2 ]Inserm, U590 Lyon, F-69008, France
                [3 ]Centre Léon Bérard Lyon, F-69008, France
                [4 ]Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Faculté Grange Blanche, CNRS, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive Lyon, F-69373, France
                [5 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service d'Hygiène, Epidémiologie et Prévention Lyon, F-69437, France
                [6 ]Centre Léon Bérard, Département de Santé Publique Lyon, F-69008, France
                [7 ]Centre Léon Bérard, Service d'Anatomopathologie Lyon, F-69008, France
                [8 ]Université de Lyon, université Lyon 1, Faculté Grange Blanche, CNRS, UMR5201, Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Signalisation et Cancer Lyon, F-69008, France
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence: moyret@ 123456lyon.fnclcc.fr
                [9]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                6605193
                10.1038/sj.bjc.6605193
                2736830
                19672267
                5ea099de-3afb-42ed-b81a-abd1b2c55a7e
                Copyright 2009, Cancer Research UK
                History
                : 16 April 2009
                : 21 June 2009
                : 30 June 2009
                Categories
                Molecular Diagnostics

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                prognostic value,dicer,tma,mrna,quantitative rt–pcr,breast cancer
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                prognostic value, dicer, tma, mrna, quantitative rt–pcr, breast cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article