455
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reduced-Force Closed Trocar Entry Technique: Analysis of Trocar Insertion Force Using a Mechanical Force Gauge

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Reduced force trocar entry technique decreases trocar insertion force by 50% and is fast, safe, and cost effective.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives:

          Trocar insertion injury has a high morbidity, mortality, and cost. The purpose of this study was to compare standard trocar entry with our reduced-force closed trocar entry technique by measuring trocar insertion force using a mechanical force gauge.

          Methods:

          In the operating room, the force gauge was inserted into a sterile glove and connected to the proximal portion of the trocar to measure insertion force. Through one incision, we used a standard closed trocar entry, while through the other incision, we used our reduced-force closed trocar entry technique. After making the skin incision and before trocar entry, we spread and dilated the skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascia, and muscle with a hemostat.

          Results:

          Twenty-five patients entered the trial and none were excluded. Median trocar insertion force was 3.3lb (range, 1.6 to 5.4) with our reduced-force trocar entry technique versus 6.5lb (range, 2.0 to 14.0) with the standard trocar entry (P=.001). No complications occurred with the reduced-force trocar entry technique.

          Conclusion:

          Our reduced-force trocar entry technique decreases trocar insertion force by 50%, requires no additional instruments or cost and is fast and safe. Reduced-entry force pressure may decrease the risk of trocar insertion injury.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications.

          To provide clinical direction, based on the best evidence available, on laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies and their associated complications. The laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies reviewed in formulating this guideline include the classic pneumoperitoneum (Veress/trocar), the open (Hasson), the direct trocar insertion, the use of disposable shielded trocars, radially expanding trocars, and visual entry systems. Implementation of this guideline should optimize the decision-making process in choosing a particular technique to enter the abdomen during laparoscopy. English-language articles from Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database published before the end of September 2005 were searched, using the key words laparoscopic entry, laparoscopy access, pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle, open (Hasson), direct trocar, visual entry, shielded trocars, radially expanded trocars, and laparoscopic complications. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY STATEMENT: 1. Left upper quadrant (LUQ, Palmer's) laparoscopic entry should be considered in patients with suspected or known periumbilical adhesions or history or presence of umbilical hernia, or after three failed insufflation attempts at the umbilicus. (II-2 A) Other sites of insertion, such as transuterine Veress CO(2) insufflation, may be considered if the umbilical and LUQ insertions have failed or have been considered and are not an option. (I-A) 2. The various Veress needle safety tests or checks provide very little useful information on the placement of the Veress needle. It is therefore not necessary to perform various safety checks on inserting the Veress needle; however, waggling of the Veress needle from side to side must be avoided, as this can enlarge a 1.6 mm puncture injury to an injury of up to 1 cm in viscera or blood vessels. (II-1 A) 3. The Veress intraperitoneal (VIP-pressure
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery.

            Disposable trocars with safety shields are widely used for laparoscopic access. The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors associated with injuries resulting from their use as reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Manufacturers are required to report medical device-related incidents to the Food and Drug Administration. We analyzed the 629 trocar injuries reported from 1993 through 1996. There were three types of injury: 408 injuries of major blood vessels, 182 other visceral injuries (mainly bowel injuries), and 30 abdominal wall hematomas. Of the 32 deaths, 26 (81%) resulted from vascular injuries and 6 (19%) resulted from bowel injuries. Eighty-seven percent of deaths from vascular injuries involved the use of disposable trocars with safety shields and 9% involved disposable trocars with a direct-viewing feature. The aorta (23%) and inferior vena cava (15%) were the vessels most commonly traumatized in the fatal vascular injuries. Ninety-one percent of bowel injuries involved trocars with safety shields and 7% involved direct-view trocars. The diagnosis of an enterotomy was delayed in 10% of cases, and the mortality rate in this group was 21%. In 41 cases (10%) the surgeon initially thought the trocar had malfunctioned, but in only 1 instance was malfunction subsequently found when the device was examined. The likelihood of injury was not related to any specific procedure or manufacturer. These data show that safety shields and direct-view trocars cannot prevent serious injuries. Retroperitoneal vascular injuries should be largely avoidable by following safe techniques. Bowel injuries often went unrecognized, in which case they were highly lethal. Device malfunction was rarely a cause of trocar injuries.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Robotic radical hysterectomy.

              Advanced laparoscopic procedures are increasing being used in gynecologic surgery. The da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA) can further augment laparoscopic surgery. We describe our initial experience using the da Vinci robotic system to perform radical hysterectomy. Twenty consecutive patients with primary stage IB-IIA cervical carcinoma underwent class 3 radical hysterectomy with the use of the da Vinci robotic system. Median age was 44 years, median weight was 69.9 kg, 65% of patients had medical comorbidity, and 40% had prior abdominal surgery. All 20 patients successfully underwent robotic radical hysterectomy. Median operative time was 6.5 hours (3.5-8.5 hours) and median blood loss was 300 mL. All patients were discharged on the first day after surgery. At median follow-up of 2 years (0.6-3 years), 90% of patients are alive and disease free. We report the first series of robotic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. All cases were successfully performed robotically with minimal complications and all patients were discharged on postoperative day 1.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JSLS
                JSLS
                jsls
                jsls
                JSLS
                JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
                Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons (Miami, FL )
                1086-8089
                1938-3797
                Jan-Mar 2011
                : 15
                : 1
                : 59-61
                Affiliations
                Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pennsylvania State University, Milton S. Hershey Medical Centre, Hershey, Pennsylvania USA.
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: James Fanning, DO, Professor, Chief, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pennsylvania State University, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive – Room C-3620, Hershey, PA 17033. USA. Telephone: (717) 531-8144, Fax: (717) 531-0007, E-mail: jfanning1@ 123456hmc.psu.edu
                Article
                10-04-061
                10.4293/108680811X13022985131219
                3134697
                21902944
                5e9a3440-534c-48a1-aa45-fb0c746dc7f5
                © 2011 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.

                History
                Categories
                Scientific Papers

                Surgery
                trocar entry,reduced force,laparoscopy
                Surgery
                trocar entry, reduced force, laparoscopy

                Comments

                Comment on this article