5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Age differences in neural correlates of feedback processing after economic decisions under risk.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study examines age-related differences in behavioral responses to risk and in the neurophysiological correlates of feedback processing. Our sample was composed of younger, middle-aged, and older adults, who were asked to decide between 2 risky options, in the gain and loss domains, during an EEG recording. Results evidenced group-related differences in early and later stages of feedback processing, indexed by differences in the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3 amplitudes. Specifically, in the loss domain, younger adults showed higher FRN amplitudes after non-losses than after losses, whereas middle-aged and older adults had similar FRN amplitudes after both. In the gain domain, younger and middle-aged adults had higher P3 amplitudes after gains than after non-gains, whereas older adults had similar P3 amplitudes after both. Behaviorally, older adults had higher rates of risky decisions than younger adults in the loss domain, a result that was correlated with poorer performance in memory and executive functions. Our results suggest age-related differences in the outcome-related expectations, as well as in the affective relevance attributed to the outcomes, which may underlie the group differences found in risk-aversion.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Neurobiol. Aging
          Neurobiology of aging
          Elsevier BV
          1558-1497
          0197-4580
          May 2018
          : 65
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Language Research Laboratory, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. Electronic address: carinafernandes@fpce.up.pt.
          [2 ] Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
          [3 ] Language Research Laboratory, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
          Article
          S0197-4580(18)30010-1
          10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.01.003
          29407466
          5e2402a7-ad00-471e-9ec4-adaa6a9a019d
          History

          Decision-making,Feedback processing,Risk,P3,Feedback-related negativity

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content85

          Cited by8