1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Inequalities in cancer mortality trends in people with type 2 diabetes: 20 year population-based study in England

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims/hypothesis

          The aim of this study was to describe the long-term trends in cancer mortality rates in people with type 2 diabetes based on subgroups defined by sociodemographic characteristics and risk factors.

          Methods

          We defined a cohort of individuals aged ≥35 years who had newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1 January 1998 and 30 November 2018. We assessed trends in all-cause, all-cancer and cancer-specific mortality rates by age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, obesity and smoking status. We used Poisson regression to calculate age- and calendar year-specific mortality rates and Joinpoint regression to assess trends for each outcome. We estimated standardised mortality ratios comparing mortality rates in people with type 2 diabetes with those in the general population.

          Results

          Among 137,804 individuals, during a median follow-up of 8.4 years, all-cause mortality rates decreased at all ages between 1998 and 2018; cancer mortality rates also decreased for 55- and 65-year-olds but increased for 75- and 85-year-olds, with average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) of –1.4% (95% CI –1.5, –1.3), –0.2% (–0.3, –0.1), 1.2% (0.8, 1.6) and 1.6% (1.5, 1.7), respectively. Higher AAPCs were observed in women than men (1.5% vs 0.5%), in the least deprived than the most deprived (1.5% vs 1.0%) and in people with morbid obesity than those with normal body weight (5.8% vs 0.7%), although all these stratified subgroups showed upward trends in cancer mortality rates. Increasing cancer mortality rates were also observed in people of White ethnicity and former/current smokers, but downward trends were observed in other ethnic groups and non-smokers. These results have led to persistent inequalities by gender and deprivation but widening disparities by smoking status. Constant upward trends in mortality rates were also observed for pancreatic, liver and lung cancer at all ages, colorectal cancer at most ages, breast cancer at younger ages, and prostate and endometrial cancer at older ages. Compared with the general population, people with type 2 diabetes had a more than 1.5-fold increased risk of colorectal, pancreatic, liver and endometrial cancer mortality during the whole study period.

          Conclusions/interpretation

          In contrast to the declines in all-cause mortality rates at all ages, the cancer burden has increased in older people with type 2 diabetes, especially for colorectal, pancreatic, liver and endometrial cancer. Tailored cancer prevention and early detection strategies are needed to address persistent inequalities in the older population, the most deprived and smokers.

          Graphical abstract

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00125-022-05854-8.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement

          Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will enhance the implementation and understanding of RECORD. Through implementation of RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can encourage transparency of research reporting.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

            The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) is an ongoing primary care database of anonymised medical records from general practitioners, with coverage of over 11.3 million patients from 674 practices in the UK. With 4.4 million active (alive, currently registered) patients meeting quality criteria, approximately 6.9% of the UK population are included and patients are broadly representative of the UK general population in terms of age, sex and ethnicity. General practitioners are the gatekeepers of primary care and specialist referrals in the UK. The CPRD primary care database is therefore a rich source of health data for research, including data on demographics, symptoms, tests, diagnoses, therapies, health-related behaviours and referrals to secondary care. For over half of patients, linkage with datasets from secondary care, disease-specific cohorts and mortality records enhance the range of data available for research. The CPRD is very widely used internationally for epidemiological research and has been used to produce over 1000 research studies, published in peer-reviewed journals across a broad range of health outcomes. However, researchers must be aware of the complexity of routinely collected electronic health records, including ways to manage variable completeness, misclassification and development of disease definitions for research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Global trends in diabetes complications: a review of current evidence

              In recent decades, large increases in diabetes prevalence have been demonstrated in virtually all regions of the world. The increase in the number of people with diabetes or with a longer duration of diabetes is likely to alter the disease profile in many populations around the globe, particularly due to a higher incidence of diabetes-specific complications, such as kidney failure and peripheral arterial disease. The epidemiology of other conditions frequently associated with diabetes, including infections and cardiovascular disease, may also change, with direct effects on quality of life, demands on health services and economic costs. The current understanding of the international burden of and variation in diabetes-related complications is poor. The available data suggest that rates of myocardial infarction, stroke and amputation are decreasing among people with diabetes, in parallel with declining mortality. However, these data predominantly come from studies in only a few high-income countries. Trends in other complications of diabetes, such as end-stage renal disease, retinopathy and cancer, are less well explored. In this review, we synthesise data from population-based studies on trends in diabetes complications, with the objectives of: (1) characterising recent and long-term trends in diabetes-related complications; (2) describing regional variation in the excess risk of complications, where possible; and (3) identifying and prioritising gaps for future surveillance and study.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                suping.ling@lshtm.ac.uk
                Journal
                Diabetologia
                Diabetologia
                Diabetologia
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0012-186X
                1432-0428
                24 January 2023
                24 January 2023
                2023
                : 66
                : 4
                : 657-673
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.9918.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8411, Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Leicester Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, , University of Leicester, ; Leicester, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.9918.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8411, Leicester Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, , University of Leicester, ; Leicester, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.8991.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0425 469X, Present Address: Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, ; London, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.9918.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8411, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC EM), , University of Leicester, ; Leicester, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.412934.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0400 6629, Leicester HPB Unit, , Leicester General Hospital, ; Leicester, UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.9918.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8411, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, Leicester Royal Infirmary, , University of Leicester, ; Leicester, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.269014.8, ISNI 0000 0001 0435 9078, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, , University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and the University of Leicester, ; Leicester, UK
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7207-5656
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2636-6487
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0502-8814
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-9371
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2343-7099
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5217-1501
                Article
                5854
                10.1007/s00125-022-05854-8
                9947024
                36690836
                5e18b8ee-2206-48ef-bbea-155109d0593e
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 June 2022
                : 15 November 2022
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                cancer,electronic health records,inequalities,mortality trends,type 2 diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article