19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical Utility of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa). It is not yet established whether all men with negative MRI (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 score <3) should undergo prostate biopsy or not.

          Objective

          To develop and validate a prediction model that uses clinical parameters to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies by predicting PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) for men with negative MRI findings who are at risk of harboring PCa.

          Design, setting, and participants

          This was a retrospective analysis of 200 men with negative MRI at risk of PCa who underwent prostate biopsy (2014–2020) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >4 ng/ml, 4Kscore of >7%, PSA density ≥0.15 ng/ml/cm 3, and/or suspicious digital rectal examination. The validation cohort included 182 men from another centre (University of Miami) with negative MRI who underwent systematic prostate biopsy with the same criteria.

          Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

          csPCa was defined as Gleason grade group ≥2 on biopsy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed using coefficients of logit function for predicting PCa and csPCa. Nomogram validation was performed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and comparing nomogram-predicted probabilities with actual rates of PCa and csPCa.

          Results and limitations

          Of 200 men in the development cohort, 18% showed PCa and 8% showed csPCa on biopsy. Of 182 men in the validation cohort, 21% showed PCa and 6% showed csPCa on biopsy. PSA density, 4Kscore, and family history of PCa were significant predictors for PCa and csPCa. The AUC was 0.80 and 0.87 for prediction of PCa and csPCa, respectively. There was agreement between predicted and actual rates of PCa in the validation cohort. Using the prediction model at threshold of 40, 47% of benign biopsies and 15% of indolent PCa cases diagnosed could be avoided, while missing 10% of csPCa cases. The small sample size and number of events are limitations of the study.

          Conclusions

          Our prediction model can reduce the number of prostate biopsies among men with negative MRI without compromising the detection of csPCa.

          Patient summary

          We developed a tool for selection of men with negative MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) findings for prostate cancer who should undergo prostate biopsy. This risk prediction tool safely reduces the number of men who need to undergo the procedure.

          Take Home Message

          Men with negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings pose a diagnostic challenge to physicians as they may have prostate cancer in the absence of accepted clinical predictors. Our model for selection of men with negative MRI findings for biopsy safely reduces the number of men who need to undergo a biopsy procedure.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2.

          The Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS™ v2) is the product of an international collaboration of the American College of Radiology (ACR), European Society of Uroradiology (ESUR), and AdMetech Foundation. It is designed to promote global standardization and diminish variation in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) examination, and it is based on the best available evidence and expert consensus opinion. It establishes minimum acceptable technical parameters for prostate mpMRI, simplifies and standardizes terminology and content of reports, and provides assessment categories that summarize levels of suspicion or risk of clinically significant prostate cancer that can be used to assist selection of patients for biopsies and management. It is intended to be used in routine clinical practice and also to facilitate data collection and outcome monitoring for research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up

            The Lancet, 384(9959), 2027-2035
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy

              Prostate biopsy (PB) represents the gold standard method to confirm the presence of cancer. In addition to traditional random or systematic approaches, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided technique has been introduced recently.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Eur Urol Open Sci
                Eur Urol Open Sci
                European Urology Open Science
                Elsevier
                2666-1691
                2666-1683
                19 April 2021
                June 2021
                19 April 2021
                : 28
                : 9-16
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
                [b ]Department of Urology, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia
                [c ]Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
                [d ]Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA. Tel. +1 929 3702225; Fax: +1 646 5378508. vinayak.wagaskar@ 123456mountsinai.org
                Article
                S2666-1683(21)00071-9
                10.1016/j.euros.2021.03.008
                8317880
                34337520
                5db7b887-b495-4b5c-b564-c2ba724944bf

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 23 March 2021
                Categories
                Prostate Cancer

                prostate cancer,predictive nomogram,multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content180

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors276