16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Protection Through Presence: UN Peacekeeping and the Costs of Targeting Civilians

      , ,
      International Organization
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Are UN peacekeepers effective in protecting civilians from violence? Existing studies examine this issue at the country level, thereby making it difficult to isolate the effect of peacekeepers and to assess the actual mechanism at work. We provide the first comprehensive evaluation of UN peacekeeping success in protecting civilians at the subnational level. We argue that peacekeepers through their sizable local presence can increase the political and military costs for warring actors to engage in civilian targeting. Since peacekeepers’ access to civilian populations rests on government consent, peacekeepers will primarily be effective in imposing these costs on rebel groups, but less so for government actors. To test these conjectures we combine new monthly data on the location of peacekeepers with data on the location and timing of civilian killings in Africa. Our findings suggest that local peacekeeping presence enhances the effectiveness of civilian protection against rebel abuse, but that UN peacekeeping struggles to protect civilians from government forces.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          One-Sided Violence Against Civilians in War

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Handling and Manhandling Civilians in Civil War

            The toll of civil conflict is largely borne by civilian populations, as warring factions target non-combatants through campaigns of violence. But significant variation exists in the extent to which warring groups abuse the civilian population: across conflicts, across groups, and within countries geographically and over time. Using a new dataset on fighting groups in Sierra Leone, this article analyzes the determinants of the tactics, strategies, and behaviors that warring factions employ in their relationships with noncombatants. We first describe a simple logic of extraction which we use to generate hypotheses about variation in levels of abuse across fighting units. We then show that the most important determinants of civilian abuse are internal to the structure of the faction. High levels of abuse are exhibited by warring factions that are unable to police the behavior of their members because they are more ethnically fragmented, rely on material incentives to recruit participants, and lack mechanisms for punishing indiscipline. Explanations that emphasize the importance of local community ties and contestation do not find strong support in the data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              “Draining the Sea”: Mass Killing and Guerrilla Warfare

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                International Organization
                Int Org
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0020-8183
                1531-5088
                2019
                August 29 2018
                2019
                : 73
                : 1
                : 103-131
                Article
                10.1017/S0020818318000346
                5d7db20a-dee5-43d8-bd07-04168ea396f6
                © 2019

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article