1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Empfehlungen für die Umgebungsuntersuchungen bei Tuberkulose – Update 2023

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Zusammenfassung

          Ziel der Umgebungsuntersuchung bei Tuberkulose ist neben der aktiven Fallfindung das Aufdecken von Infektionsketten sowie die Verhütung der Weiterverbreitung der Erkrankung. Dabei ist eine sorgfältige Auswahl der Kontaktpersonen notwendig, die sich nach Art und Dauer des Kontaktes richtet, um möglichst frisch Infizierte zu identifizieren und so den Nutzen einer anschließenden präventiven Therapie zu erhöhen und unnötige Testungen von Personen ohne Ansteckungsrisiko zu vermeiden. Seit der letzten Überarbeitung der Empfehlungen zur Umgebungsuntersuchung hat sich die Datenlage zum Einsatz von Interferon-y release-Assays (IGRAs) bei Kindern weiterhin verbessert. Diese werden bevorzugt in der Umgebungsuntersuchung von erwachsenen Kontaktpersonen eingesetzt. Für Kinder unter 15 Jahren können sowohl IGRAs wie auch weiterhin der Tuberkulin-Hauttest gleichwertig verwendet werden. Als präventive Therapie bei nachgewiesener Infektion werden Rifampicin für 4 Monate, Rifampicin und Isoniazid für 3 Monate oder aber Isoniazid für 9 Monate empfohlen.

          Ausführlich wird auf die Durchführung der Umgebungsuntersuchung in verschiedenen Altersgruppen sowie rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und sozialmedizinische Aspekte und Herausforderungen eingegangen. Zusätzlich werden Sonderfälle, wie die Umgebungsuntersuchung in Kitas, Schulen oder in anderen Gemeinschaftseinrichtungen, separat dargestellt.

          Related collections

          Most cited references102

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. This is a Joint Statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This statement was endorsed by the Council of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. (IDSA), September 1999, and the sections of this statement.

          (2000)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Meta-analysis: new tests for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: areas of uncertainty and recommendations for research.

            Until recently, the tuberculin skin test was the only test for detecting latent tuberculosis (TB) infection, but 2 ex vivo interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are now commercially licensed. To estimate sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of IGRAs (commercial or research versions of QuantiFERON [QFT] and Elispot) for diagnosing latent TB infection in healthy and immune-suppressed persons. The authors searched MEDLINE and reviewed citations of all original articles and reviews for studies published in English. Studies had evaluated IGRAs using Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens (RD1 antigens) and overnight (16- to 24-h) incubation times. Reference standards had to be clearly defined without knowledge of test results. DATA EXTRACTION AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT: Specific criteria for quality assessment were developed for sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility. When newly diagnosed active TB was used as a surrogate for latent TB infection, sensitivity of all tests was suboptimal, although it was higher with Elispot. No test distinguishes active TB from latent TB. Sensitivity of the tuberculin skin test and IGRAs was similar in persons who were categorized into clinical gradients of exposure. Pooled specificity was 97.7% (95% CI, 96% to 99%) and 92.5% (CI, 86% to 99%) for QFT and for Elispot, respectively. Both assays were more specific than the tuberculin skin test in samples vaccinated with bacille Calmette-Guérin. Elispot was more sensitive than the tuberculin skin test in 3 studies of immune-compromised samples. Discordant tuberculin skin test and IGRA reactions were frequent and largely unexplained, although some may be related to varied definitions of positive test results. Reversion of IGRA results from positive to negative was common in 2 studies in which it was assessed. Most studies used cross-sectional designs with the inherent limitation of no gold standard for latent TB infection, and most involved small samples with a widely varying likelihood of true-positive and false-positive test results. There is insufficient evidence on IGRA performance in children, immune-compromised persons, and the elderly. New IGRAs show considerable promise and have excellent specificity. Additional studies are needed to better define their performance in high-risk populations and in serial testing. Longitudinal studies are needed to define the predictive value of IGRAs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Updated guidelines for using Interferon Gamma Release Assays to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection - United States, 2010.

              n 2005, CDC published guidelines for using the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test (QFT-G) (Cellestis Limited, Carnegie, Victoria, Australia) (CDC. Guidelines for using the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, United States. MMWR;54[No. RR-15]:49-55). Subsequently, two new interferon gamma (IFN- gamma) release assays (IGRAs) were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as aids in diagnosing M. tuberculosis infection, both latent infection and infection manifesting as active tuberculosis. These tests are the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT) (Cellestis Limited, Carnegie, Victoria, Australia) and the T-SPOT.TB test (T-Spot) (Oxford Immunotec Limited, Abingdon, United Kingdom). The antigens, methods, and interpretation criteria for these assays differ from those for IGRAs approved previously by FDA. For assistance in developing recommendations related to IGRA use, CDC convened a group of experts to review the scientific evidence and provide opinions regarding use of IGRAs. Data submitted to FDA, published reports, and expert opinion related to IGRAs were used in preparing these guidelines. Results of studies examining sensitivity, specificity, and agreement for IGRAs and TST vary with respect to which test is better. Although data on the accuracy of IGRAs and their ability to predict subsequent active tuberculosis are limited, to date, no major deficiencies have been reported in studies involving various populations. This report provides guidance to U.S. public health officials, health-care providers, and laboratory workers for use of FDA-approved IGRAs in the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection in adults and children. In brief, TSTs and IGRAs (QFT-G, QFT-GIT, and T-Spot) may be used as aids in diagnosing M. tuberculosis infection. They may be used for surveillance purposes and to identify persons likely to benefit from treatment. Multiple additional recommendations are provided that address quality control, test selection, and medical management after testing. Although substantial progress has been made in documenting the utility of IGRAs, additional research is needed that focuses on the value and limitations of IGRAs in situations of importance to medical care or tuberculosis control. Specific areas needing additional research are listed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pneumologie
                Pneumologie
                Georg Thieme Verlag KG
                0934-8387
                1438-8790
                September 11 2023
                September 2023
                August 03 2023
                September 2023
                : 77
                : 09
                : 607-631
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
                [2 ]Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Großhansdorf
                [3 ]Deutsches Zentralkomitee zur Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose, Berlin
                [4 ]Amt für Gesundheit und Prävention der Landeshauptstadt Dresden
                [5 ]Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin
                [6 ]Universitätsmedizin Rostock
                [7 ]Helios-Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin
                [8 ]Gesundheitsamt Hamburg-Mitte, Hamburg
                [9 ]Berufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheits- und Wohlfahrtspflege, Hamburg
                [10 ]Universitätskrankenhaus Eppendorf, Hamburg
                [11 ]Gesundheitsamt, Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart
                [12 ]Institut für Krankenhaushygiene, Universitätsklinikum JWK, Minden
                Article
                10.1055/a-2107-2147
                5d5c728a-2ea7-412b-b5fe-e23e4f80b3e9
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article