13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A randomized, controlled trial of once-weekly teriparatide injection versus alendronate in patients at high risk of osteoporotic fracture: primary results of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Summary

          In this randomized, controlled trial, treatment with once-weekly subcutaneous injection of teriparatide for 72 weeks was found to be associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of morphometric vertebral fractures compared with alendronate in women with primary osteoporosis who were at high risk of fracture.

          Introduction

          To determine whether the anti-fracture efficacy of teriparatide is superior to that of alendronate, a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial was performed.

          Methods

          Japanese women aged at least 75 years were eligible for the study if they had primary osteoporosis and were at high risk of fracture. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sequential therapy (once-weekly subcutaneous injection of teriparatide 56.5 μg for 72 weeks followed by alendronate for 48 weeks) or monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of morphometric vertebral fractures at 72 weeks (at the end of teriparatide treatment).

          Results

          Between October 2014 and December 2017, 1011 patients (505 in the teriparatide group and 506 in the alendronate group) were enrolled. Of these, 778 patients (351 and 427, respectively) were included in the primary analysis. The incidence of morphometric vertebral fractures was significantly lower in the teriparatide group (56 per 419.9 person-years, annual incidence rate 0.1334) than in the alendronate group (96 per 553.6 person-years, annual incidence rate 0.1734), with a rate ratio of 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.99, P = 0.04). In both groups, adverse events were most frequently reported in the following system organ classes: infections and infestations, gastrointestinal disorders, and musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders.

          Conclusion

          Once-weekly subcutaneous injection of teriparatide significantly reduced the incidence of morphometric vertebral fractures compared with alendronate in women with primary osteoporosis who were at high risk of fracture.

          Trial registration

          jRCTs031180235 and UMIN000015573, March 12, 2019

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00198-021-05996-2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

          Summary Guidance is provided in a European setting on the assessment and treatment of postmenopausal women at risk from fractures due to osteoporosis. Introduction The International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis published guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in 2013. This manuscript updates these in a European setting. Methods Systematic reviews were updated. Results The following areas are reviewed: the role of bone mineral density measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk; general and pharmacological management of osteoporosis; monitoring of treatment; assessment of fracture risk; case-finding strategies; investigation of patients; health economics of treatment. The update includes new information on the evaluation of bone microstructure evaluation in facture risk assessment, the role of FRAX® and Fracture Liaison Services in secondary fracture prevention, long-term effects on fracture risk of dietary intakes, and increased fracture risk on stopping drug treatment. Conclusions A platform is provided on which specific guidelines can be developed for national use.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

            The assessment of vertebral fracture by conventional radiography has been refined and improved using either semiquantitative or quantitative criteria. The inter- and intraobserver variability was determined for a semiquantitative visual approach that we routinely use in clinical studies for assessing prevalent and incident vertebral fractures. In addition, the semiquantitative approach was compared with a quantitative morphometric approach. The incidence and prevalence of vertebral fractures were determined in 57 postmenopausal women (age 65-75 years) by three independent observers. The radiographic basis for fracture definitions and the source of interobserver agreement for the semiquantitative technique. We conclude that the semiquantitative approach can be applied reliably in vertebral fracture assessment when performed using well-defined criteria.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmacological Management of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hagino@tottori-u.ac.jp
                sugimoto@med.shimane-u.ac.jp
                tanaka.shiro.8n@kyoto-u.ac.jp
                s.kotaro79@gmail.com
                tsone@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp
                t-nak@utopia.ocn.ne.jp
                nra48207@nifty.com
                stmori@sis.seirei.or.jp
                Journal
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporosis International
                Springer London (London )
                0937-941X
                1433-2965
                17 May 2021
                17 May 2021
                2021
                : 32
                : 11
                : 2301-2311
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.265107.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0663 5064, School of Health Science, , Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, ; Yonago, Tottori Japan
                [2 ]Eikokai Ono Hospital, 973 Tenjin-cho, Ono, Hyogo Japan
                [3 ]GRID grid.258799.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0372 2033, Department of Clinical Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, , Kyoto University, ; Kyoto, Japan
                [4 ]GRID grid.415086.e, ISNI 0000 0001 1014 2000, Department of Nuclear Medicine, , Kawasaki Medical School, ; Kurashiki, Okayama Japan
                [5 ]Japan Osteoporosis Foundation, Tokyo, Japan
                [6 ]Soen Orthopaedics, Osteoporosis and Rheumatology Clinic, Kobe, Hyogo Japan
                [7 ]GRID grid.415466.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0377 8408, Bone and Joint Surgery, , Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, ; Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8053-1095
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6817-5235
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0955-2747
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7660-5562
                Article
                5996
                10.1007/s00198-021-05996-2
                8563544
                34002252
                5d481ba8-04da-47a6-b20d-783bcae5a4ea
                © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 February 2021
                : 5 May 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Public Health Research Foundation
                Funded by: Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp.
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2021

                Orthopedics
                bone-forming agent,high risk of fracture,vertebral fracture,non-vertebral fracture,weekly teriparatide

                Comments

                Comment on this article