15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Approximately 1.3 million people die each year globally as a direct result of motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). Following an MVC some patients will remain trapped in their vehicle; these patients have worse outcomes and may require extrication. Following new evidence, updated multidisciplinary guidance for extrication is needed.

          Methods

          This Delphi study has been developed, conducted and reported to CREDES standards. A literature review identified areas of expertise and appropriate individuals were recruited to a Steering Group. The Steering Group formulated initial statements for consideration. Stakeholder organisations were invited to identify subject matter experts (SMEs) from a rescue and clinical background (total 60). SMEs participated over three rounds via an online platform. Consensus for agreement / disagreement was set at 70%. At each stage SMEs could offer feedback on, or modification to the statements considered which was reviewed and incorporated into new statements or new supporting information for the following rounds. Stakeholders agreed a set of principles based on the consensus statements on which future guidance should be based.

          Results

          Sixty SMEs completed Round 1, 53 Round 2 (88%) and 49 Round 3 (82%). Consensus was reached on 91 statements (89 agree, 2 disagree) covering a broad range of domains related to: extrication terminology, extrication goals and approach, self-extrication, disentanglement, clinical care, immobilisation, patient-focused extrication, emergency services call and triage, and audit and research standards. Thirty-three statements did not reach consensus.

          Conclusion

          This study has demonstrated consensus across a large panel of multidisciplinary SMEs on many key areas of extrication and related practice that will provide a key foundation in the development of evidence-based guidance for this subject area.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01029-x.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.

          To investigate how consensus is operationalized in Delphi studies and to explore the role of consensus in determining the results of these studies. Systematic review of a random sample of 100 English language Delphi studies, from two large multidisciplinary databases [ISI Web of Science (Thompson Reuters, New York, NY) and Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL)], published between 2000 and 2009. About 98 of the Delphi studies purported to assess consensus, although a definition for consensus was only provided in 72 of the studies (64 a priori). The most common definition for consensus was percent agreement (25 studies), with 75% being the median threshold to define consensus. Although the authors concluded in 86 of the studies that consensus was achieved, consensus was only specified a priori (with a threshold value) in 42 of these studies. Achievement of consensus was related to the decision to stop the Delphi study in only 23 studies, with 70 studies terminating after a specified number of rounds. Although consensus generally is felt to be of primary importance to the Delphi process, definitions of consensus vary widely and are poorly reported. Improved criteria for reporting of methods of Delphi studies are required. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.

            Consensus methods such as the Delphi survey technique are being employed to help enhance effective decision-making in health and social care. The Delphi survey is a group facilitation technique, which is an iterative multistage process, designed to transform opinion into group consensus. It is a flexible approach, that is used commonly within the health and social sciences, yet little guidance exists to help researchers undertake this method of data collection. This paper aims to provide an understanding of the preparation, action steps and difficulties that are inherent within the Delphi. Used systematically and rigorously, the Delphi can contribute significantly to broadening knowledge within the nursing profession. However, careful thought must be given before using the method; there are key issues surrounding problem identification, researcher skills and data presentation that must be addressed. The paper does not claim to be definitive; it purports to act as a guide for those researchers who wish to exploit the Delphi methodology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?

              There is confusion and misunderstanding about the concepts of knowledge translation, knowledge transfer, knowledge exchange, research utilization, implementation, diffusion, and dissemination. We review the terms and definitions used to describe the concept of moving knowledge into action. We also offer a conceptual framework for thinking about the process and integrate the roles of knowledge creation and knowledge application. The implications of knowledge translation for continuing education in the health professions include the need to base continuing education on the best available knowledge, the use of educational and other transfer strategies that are known to be effective, and the value of learning about planned-action theories to be better able to understand and influence change in practice settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                timnutbeam@nhs.net
                robfenwickrn@googlemail.com
                jasonesmith@nhs.net
                brian.carlin@aspire.org.uk
                acutebrain@gmail.com
                lee.wallis@uct.ac.za
                willem.stassen@uct.ac.za
                Journal
                Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
                Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
                Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1757-7241
                20 June 2022
                20 June 2022
                2022
                : 30
                : 41
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.418670.c, ISNI 0000 0001 0575 1952, Emergency Department, , University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, ; Plymouth, UK
                [2 ]Devon Air Ambulance Trust, Exeter, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.7836.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, Division of Emergency Medicine, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [4 ]GRID grid.416270.6, ISNI 0000 0000 8813 3684, Emergency Department, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, ; Wrexham, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.415490.d, ISNI 0000 0001 2177 007X, Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, ; Birmingham, UK
                [6 ]Former Fire Officer (Research), National Fire Chiefs Council, Birmingham, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, Association for Spinal Injury Research, Rehabilitation and Reintegration, Department of Orthopaedics & Musculoskeletal Science, , University College London, ; London, UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.7445.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, Imperial Neurotrauma Centre, , Imperial College, ; London, UK
                [9 ]Kent, Surrey and Sussex Air Ambulance, Rochester, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-9240
                Article
                1029
                10.1186/s13049-022-01029-x
                9208189
                35725580
                5cf9f9aa-c6d8-4996-a329-08651e67bb77
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 26 March 2022
                : 12 June 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Road Safety Trust
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article