0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Goethite supplemented natural clay ceramic as an alternative proton exchange membrane and its application in microbial fuel cell

      , , ,
      Ionics
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Performance evaluation of low cost microbial fuel cell fabricated using earthen pot with biotic and abiotic cathode.

          An attempt has been made to produce low cost MFC from the commercially available earthen pots in India, without involving any costly membrane. This MFC gave a maximum power output of 16.8 W/m(3) at a Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 31.3% with graphite plate cathode. With stainless steel mesh cathode and KMnO(4) as cathodic electrolyte the power production and CE of 70.48 W/m(3) and 64.5%, respectively, was obtained. The performance of this earthen pot MFC was evaluated with biotic and abiotic cathode. Although, biofilm formation on the cathode is observed to be helpful in enhancing power out put, the thicker biofilm on the cathode showed reduction in power. This MFC demonstrated competitive performance as compared to MFC incorporated with membrane. This low cost MFC, with total production cost of less than 1.0$, as per Indian market, demonstrated its utility as a wastewater treatment and onsite power generation device.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Pee power urinal – microbial fuel cell technology field trials in the context of sanitation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluating a multi-panel air cathode through electrochemical and biotic tests.

              To scale up microbial fuel cells (MFCs), larger cathodes need to be developed that can use air directly, rather than dissolved oxygen, and have good electrochemical performance. A new type of cathode design was examined here that uses a "window-pane" approach with fifteen smaller cathodes welded to a single conductive metal sheet to maintain good electrical conductivity across the cathode with an increase in total area. Abiotic electrochemical tests were conducted to evaluate the impact of the cathode size (exposed areas of 7 cm2, 33 cm2, and 6200 cm2) on performance for all cathodes having the same active catalyst material. Increasing the size of the exposed area of the electrodes to the electrolyte from 7 cm2 to 33 cm2 (a single cathode panel) decreased the cathode potential by 5%, and a further increase in size to 6200 cm2 using the multi-panel cathode reduced the electrode potential by 55% (at 0.6 A m-2), in a 50 mM phosphate buffer solution (PBS). In 85 L MFC tests with the largest cathode using wastewater as a fuel, the maximum power density based on polarization data was 0.083 ± 0.006 W m-2 using 22 brush anodes to fully cover the cathode, and 0.061 ± 0.003 W m-2 with 8 brush anodes (40% of cathode projected area) compared to 0.304 ± 0.009 W m-2 obtained in the 28 mL MFC. Recovering power from large MFCs will therefore be challenging, but several approaches identified in this study can be pursued to maintain performance when increasing the size of the electrodes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ionics
                Ionics
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                0947-7047
                1862-0760
                June 2020
                February 06 2020
                June 2020
                : 26
                : 6
                : 3061-3072
                Article
                10.1007/s11581-020-03472-1
                5c920294-e9d5-4873-a60f-5b077392c8f0
                © 2020

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article