1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Racial Differences in Postpartum Blood Pressure Trajectories Among Women After a Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Does postpartum blood pressure trajectory after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy differ by race?

          Findings

          In this prospective cohort study that included 1077 women after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, blood pressure trajectories evaluated using mixed-effects linear regression models differed significantly by self-reported race. At the conclusion of the study, 68% of Black women and 51% of White women met the criteria for stage 1 or stage 2 hypertension.

          Meaning

          This study suggests that postpartum blood pressure trajectories indicate persistence of higher blood pressures among Black women in this cohort, which may have important implications for postpartum morbidity and mortality associated with hypertensive and cardiovascular conditions in this population.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Maternal morbidity and mortality are increasing in the United States, most of which occur post partum, with significant racial disparities, particularly associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Blood pressure trajectory after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy has not been previously described.

          Objectives

          To describe the blood pressure trajectory in the first 6 weeks post partum after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and to evaluate whether blood pressure trajectories differ by self-reported race.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This prospective cohort study included deliveries between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Women with a clinical diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy were enrolled in a postpartum remote blood pressure monitoring program at the time of delivery and were followed up for 6 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed from April 6 to 17, 2020.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Mixed-effects regression models were used to display blood pressure trajectories in the first 6 weeks post partum.

          Results

          A total of 1077 women were included (mean [SD] age, 30.2 [5.6] years; 804 of 1017 White [79.1%] and 213 of 1017 Black [20.9%]). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were found to decrease rapidly in the first 3 weeks post partum, with subsequent stabilization (at 6 days post partum: mean [SD] peak systolic blood pressure, 146 [13] mm Hg; mean [SD] peak diastolic blood pressure, 95 [10] mm Hg; and at 3 weeks post partum: mean [SD] peak systolic blood pressure, 130 [12] mm Hg; mean [SD] peak diastolic blood pressure, 85 [9] mm Hg). A significant difference was seen in blood pressure trajectory by race, with both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreasing more slowly among Black women compared with White women (mean [SD] peak systolic blood pressure at 1 week post partum: White women, 143 [14] mm Hg vs Black women, 146 [13] mm Hg; P = .01; mean [SD] peak diastolic blood pressure at 1 week post partum: White women, 92 [9] mm Hg vs Black women, 94 [9] mm Hg; P = .02; and mean [SD] peak systolic blood pressure at 3 weeks post partum: White women, 129 [11] mm Hg vs Black women, 136 [15] mm Hg; P < .001; mean [SD] peak diastolic blood pressure at 3 weeks post partum: White women, 84 [8] mm Hg vs Black women, 91 [13] mm Hg; P < .001). At the conclusion of the program, 126 of 185 Black women (68.1%) compared with 393 of 764 White women (51.4%) met the criteria for stage 1 or stage 2 hypertension ( P < .001).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This study found that, in the postpartum period, blood pressure decreased rapidly in the first 3 weeks and subsequently stabilized. The study also found that, compared with White women, Black women had a less rapid decrease in blood pressure, resulting in higher blood pressure by the end of a 6-week program. Given the number of women with persistent hypertension at the conclusion of the program, these findings also appear to support the importance of ongoing postpartum care beyond the first 6 weeks after delivery.

          Abstract

          This cohort study describes the blood pressure trajectory in the first 6 weeks post partum after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and evaluates whether blood pressure trajectories differ by self-reported race.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy.

            , (2013)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset disease.

              The population-based incidence of early-onset (<34 weeks) and late-onset preeclampsia (≥34 weeks) has not been adequately studied. We examined the gestational age-specific incidence of preeclampsia onset and identified the associated risk factors and birth outcomes. All singleton deliveries in Washington State, 2003-2008 (n = 456,668), were included, and preeclampsia onset was determined from hospital records linked to birth certificates. Cox and logistic regression models were used to obtain adjusted hazard ratios and odds ratios (AORs) for risk factors and birth outcomes, respectively. The overall preeclampsia rate was 3.1% and the incidence increased sharply with gestation; early- and late-onset preeclampsia rates were 0.38% and 2.72%, respectively. Among women with early-onset preeclampsia, 12% delivered at a gestation of 34 weeks or longer. Risk/protective factors common to both diseases included older maternal age, Hispanic and Native-American race, smoking, unmarried status, and male fetus. African-American race, chronic hypertension, and congenital anomalies were more strongly associated with early-onset preeclampsia, whereas younger maternal age, nulliparity, and diabetes mellitus were more strongly associated with late-onset disease. Early- but not late-onset preeclampsia conferred a high risk of fetal death (AOR, 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-8.3 vs AOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-2.0, respectively). The AOR for perinatal death/severe neonatal morbidity was 16.4 (95% CI, 14.5-18.6) in early-onset and 2.0 (95% CI, 1.8-2.3) in late-onset preeclampsia. Early- and late-onset preeclampsia shares some etiological features, differ with regard to several risk factors, and lead to different outcomes. The 2 preeclampsia types should be treated as distinct entities from an etiological and prognostic standpoint. Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                22 December 2020
                December 2020
                22 December 2020
                : 3
                : 12
                : e2030815
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [2 ]Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [3 ]Department of Clinical Analytics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [4 ]University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [5 ]Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: October 30, 2020.
                Published: December 22, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30815
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Hauspurg A et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Alisse Hauspurg, MD, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 ( janickia@ 123456upmc.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Hauspurg had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Hauspurg, Lemon, Quinn, Larkin, Beigi, Simhan.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Hauspurg, Lemon, Cabrera, Javaid, Binstock, Larkin, Watson.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Hauspurg, Lemon, Cabrera, Larkin, Beigi, Simhan.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Hauspurg, Javaid, Binstock, Quinn, Watson, Simhan.
                Statistical analysis: Hauspurg, Lemon, Larkin, Simhan.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Hauspurg, Cabrera, Quinn, Watson, Beigi, Simhan.
                Supervision: Larkin, Beigi, Simhan.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Hauspurg reported receiving grants from the University of Pittsburgh during the conduct of the study. Dr Simhan reported being a co-founder of Naima Health LLC, which does work in the domain of digital patient engagement, outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/Office of Research on Women’s Health Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health NIH K12HD043441 scholar funds to Dr Hauspurg.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Meeting Presentation: This study was presented at the 40th Annual Pregnancy Meeting of the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine; February 6, 2020; Grapevine, Texas.
                Article
                zoi200963
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30815
                7756239
                33351087
                5c8db94a-23de-4021-a425-fdd0b449dfe6
                Copyright 2020 Hauspurg A et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 24 June 2020
                : 30 October 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Obstetrics and Gynecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article