7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      XRCC1 counteracts poly(ADP ribose)polymerase (PARP) poisons, olaparib and talazoparib, and a clinical alkylating agent, temozolomide, by promoting the removal of trapped PARP1 from broken DNA

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Base excision repair (BER) removes damaged bases by generating single‐strand breaks (SSBs), gap‐filling by DNA polymerase β (POLβ), and resealing SSBs. A base‐damaging agent, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) is widely used to study BER. BER increases cellular tolerance to MMS, anti‐cancer base‐damaging drugs, temozolomide, carmustine, and lomustine, and to clinical poly(ADP ribose)polymerase (PARP) poisons, olaparib and talazoparib. The poisons stabilize PARP1/SSB complexes, inhibiting access of BER factors to SSBs. PARP1 and XRCC1 collaboratively promote SSB resealing by recruiting POLβ to SSBs, but XRCC1 −/− cells are much more sensitive to MMS than PARP1 −/− cells. We recently report that the PARP1 loss in XRCC1 −/− cells restores their MMS tolerance and conclude that XPCC1 facilitates the release of PARP1 from SSBs by maintaining its autoPARylation. We here show that the PARP1 loss in XRCC1 −/− cells also restores their tolerance to the three anti‐cancer base‐damaging drugs, although they and MMS induce different sets of base damage. We reveal the synthetic lethality of the XRCC1 −/− mutation, but not POLβ −/−, with olaparib and talazoparib, indicating that XRCC1 is a unique BER factor in suppressing toxic PARP1/SSB complex and can suppress even when PARP1 catalysis is inhibited. In conclusion, XRCC1 suppresses the PARP1/SSB complex via PARP1 catalysis‐dependent and independent mechanisms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy.

          BRCA1 and BRCA2 are important for DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination, and mutations in these genes predispose to breast and other cancers. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is an enzyme involved in base excision repair, a key pathway in the repair of DNA single-strand breaks. We show here that BRCA1 or BRCA2 dysfunction unexpectedly and profoundly sensitizes cells to the inhibition of PARP enzymatic activity, resulting in chromosomal instability, cell cycle arrest and subsequent apoptosis. This seems to be because the inhibition of PARP leads to the persistence of DNA lesions normally repaired by homologous recombination. These results illustrate how different pathways cooperate to repair damage, and suggest that the targeted inhibition of particular DNA repair pathways may allow the design of specific and less toxic therapies for cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.

            Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP1) facilitates DNA repair by binding to DNA breaks and attracting DNA repair proteins to the site of damage. Nevertheless, PARP1-/- mice are viable, fertile and do not develop early onset tumours. Here, we show that PARP inhibitors trigger gamma-H2AX and RAD51 foci formation. We propose that, in the absence of PARP1, spontaneous single-strand breaks collapse replication forks and trigger homologous recombination for repair. Furthermore, we show that BRCA2-deficient cells, as a result of their deficiency in homologous recombination, are acutely sensitive to PARP inhibitors, presumably because resultant collapsed replication forks are no longer repaired. Thus, PARP1 activity is essential in homologous recombination-deficient BRCA2 mutant cells. We exploit this requirement in order to kill BRCA2-deficient tumours by PARP inhibition alone. Treatment with PARP inhibitors is likely to be highly tumour specific, because only the tumours (which are BRCA2-/-) in BRCA2+/- patients are defective in homologous recombination. The use of an inhibitor of a DNA repair enzyme alone to selectively kill a tumour, in the absence of an exogenous DNA-damaging agent, represents a new concept in cancer treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by Clinical PARP Inhibitors.

              Small-molecule inhibitors of PARP are thought to mediate their antitumor effects as catalytic inhibitors that block repair of DNA single-strand breaks (SSB). However, the mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors with regard to their effects in cancer cells is not fully understood. In this study, we show that PARP inhibitors trap the PARP1 and PARP2 enzymes at damaged DNA. Trapped PARP-DNA complexes were more cytotoxic than unrepaired SSBs caused by PARP inactivation, arguing that PARP inhibitors act in part as poisons that trap PARP enzyme on DNA. Moreover, the potency in trapping PARP differed markedly among inhibitors with niraparib (MK-4827) > olaparib (AZD-2281) > veliparib (ABT-888), a pattern not correlated with the catalytic inhibitory properties for each drug. We also analyzed repair pathways for PARP-DNA complexes using 30 genetically altered avian DT40 cell lines with preestablished deletions in specific DNA repair genes. This analysis revealed that, in addition to homologous recombination, postreplication repair, the Fanconi anemia pathway, polymerase β, and FEN1 are critical for repairing trapped PARP-DNA complexes. In summary, our study provides a new mechanistic foundation for the rational application of PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy. ©2012 AACR.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                khirota@tmu.ac.jp
                stakeda@szu.edu.cn
                Journal
                Genes Cells
                Genes Cells
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2443
                GTC
                Genes to Cells
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1356-9597
                1365-2443
                01 March 2022
                May 2022
                : 27
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1111/gtc.v27.5 )
                : 331-344
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Radiation Genetics Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
                [ 2 ] Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science Tokyo Metropolitan University Tokyo Japan
                [ 3 ] Department of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science Hiroshima University Hiroshima Japan
                [ 4 ] Department of Molecular and Genomic Biomedicine, CBMM Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Nagasaki Japan
                [ 5 ] Shenzhen University School of Medicine Shenzhen Guangdong China
                [ 6 ] Division of Pre‐Clinical Innovation National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Kouji Hirota, Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan

                Email: khirota@ 123456tmu.ac.jp

                Shunichi Takeda, Shenzhen University School of Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China.

                Email: stakeda@ 123456szu.edu.cn

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1676-979X
                Article
                GTC12929
                10.1111/gtc.12929
                9310723
                35194903
                5c77d99b-4e28-4806-828d-7e303c50a2e8
                © 2022 The Authors. Genes to Cells published by Molecular Biology Society of Japan and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 14 February 2022
                : 12 November 2021
                : 16 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 0, Pages: 14, Words: 11085
                Funding
                Funded by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Core‐to‐Core Program, A. Advanced Research Network , doi 10.13039/501100001691;
                Award ID: KAKENHI JP16H01314
                Award ID: KAKENHI JP16H06306
                Award ID: KAKENHI JP16H12595
                Award ID: KAKENHI JP19KK0210
                Award ID: KAKENHI JP20H04337
                Funded by: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company , doi 10.13039/100008373;
                Award ID: Takeda Science Foundation
                Funded by: Yamada Science Foundation
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:25.07.2022

                Molecular biology
                carmustine,lomustine,olaparib,parp poison,parp1,talazoparib,temozolomide,xrcc1
                Molecular biology
                carmustine, lomustine, olaparib, parp poison, parp1, talazoparib, temozolomide, xrcc1

                Comments

                Comment on this article