3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Joining forces to understand what matters most: qualitative insights into the patient experience of outpatient rheumatology care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          People with rheumatic diseases are frequent, long-term attenders of health-care services. Their care experiences are central to improving services. The aim of this study was to explore real-world experiences and priorities of people attending outpatient rheumatology care and those of health-care professionals (HCPs) providing care.

          Methods

          This qualitative study consisted of five semi-structured focus groups. Participants included rheumatology outpatients ( n = 16) of two tertiary teaching hospitals and HCPs ( n = 14; rheumatologists, rheumatology trainees, physiotherapists, a specialty nurse and a pharmacist). Participants explored priorities when attending outpatient services, real experiences and aspirations for improving future care. Transcripts were coded using inductive and deductive thematic analysis.

          Results

          Seven key themes were identified: smooth flow of technical processes, care coordination, individualized care, information sharing, clinical excellence, patient empowerment and comprehensive care. The findings were aligned conceptually with quality standards in Australia and worldwide. Different sub-themes and prioritization of concerns emerged from patient and HCP subgroups. Highly prioritized themes for patients pertained to processes and technical aspects of care. HCPs focused on themes relating to non-technical aspects of service provision: information sharing, individualization of care, patient advocacy and empowerment.

          Conclusion

          This study captured valuable insights into the current experience of outpatient rheumatology care from the perspective of patients and HCPs. It informs a collective understanding of differing and shared priorities, positives of current care and areas requiring change. Themes derived from the study data can be conceptualized in terms of the process, content and impact of care. Such domains can be measured longitudinally by routine implementation of validated patient-reported experience measures in rheumatology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

          Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

            Background The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations. Discussion The article discusses when it is appropriate to adopt the Framework Method and explains the procedure for using it in multi-disciplinary health research teams, or those that involve clinicians, patients and lay people. The stages of the method are illustrated using examples from a published study. Summary Used effectively, with the leadership of an experienced qualitative researcher, the Framework Method is a systematic and flexible approach to analysing qualitative data and is appropriate for use in research teams even where not all members have previous experience of conducting qualitative research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.

              Purposeful sampling is widely used in qualitative research for the identification and selection of information-rich cases related to the phenomenon of interest. Although there are several different purposeful sampling strategies, criterion sampling appears to be used most commonly in implementation research. However, combining sampling strategies may be more appropriate to the aims of implementation research and more consistent with recent developments in quantitative methods. This paper reviews the principles and practice of purposeful sampling in implementation research, summarizes types and categories of purposeful sampling strategies and provides a set of recommendations for use of single strategy or multistage strategy designs, particularly for state implementation research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Rheumatol Adv Pract
                Rheumatol Adv Pract
                rheumap
                Rheumatology Advances in Practice
                Oxford University Press
                2514-1775
                2023
                16 August 2023
                16 August 2023
                : 7
                : 3
                : rkad068
                Affiliations
                Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, , Woodville South, SA, Australia
                Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
                School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, SA, Australia
                Nursing Education, Central Adelaide Local Health Network , Adelaide, SA, Australia
                Adelaide Nursing School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, SA, Australia
                Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, , Woodville South, SA, Australia
                Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
                School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, SA, Australia
                Patient Research Partner
                Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (Sleep Health), Flinders University , Bedford Park, SA, Australia
                Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, , Woodville South, SA, Australia
                Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
                School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, SA, Australia
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Madeleine J. Bryant, Rheumatology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia. E-mail: madeleine.bryant@ 123456sa.gov.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7946-8620
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-7430
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9534-8699
                Article
                rkad068
                10.1093/rap/rkad068
                10505502
                37724315
                5c45a897-c0a5-481d-b23a-76d000e3673a
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 April 2023
                : 10 August 2023
                : 17 September 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Federal Government Research Training Program Stipend;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Clinical Science
                AcademicSubjects/MED00010

                patient experience,care quality,patient-centred care,qualitative research

                Comments

                Comment on this article