Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Embedded Clinical Decision Support in Electronic Health Record Decreases Use of High-cost Imaging in the Emergency Department: EmbED study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9467184e191">Objective</h5> <p id="P1">Evaluate the impact of evidence-based clinical decision support tools integrated directly into provider workflow in the electronic health record on utilization of CT brain, c-spine and pulmonary embolism (PE). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9467184e196">Methods</h5> <p id="P2">Validated, well accepted scoring tools for head injury, c-spine injury and pulmonary embolism were embedded into the electronic health record in a manner minimally disruptive to provider workflow. This was a longitudinal, before/after study in 5 emergency departments in a healthcare system with a common electronic health record. Attending ED physicians practicing during the entire study period were included. The main outcome measure was proportion of CTs ordered by provider (total number of CT scans of a given type divided by total patients seen by that provider) in aggregate in the pre- and post-intervention period. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9467184e201">Results</h5> <p id="P3">There were 235,858 total patient visits analyzed in this study with an absolute decrease of 6106 CT scan ordering for the three studies. Across all sites, there was greater than 6% decrease in utilization of CT brain and CT c-spine [(−10%, 95% CI (−13%, −7%); p &lt; 0.001); (−6%, 95% CI (−11%, −1%); p = 0.03) respectively]. The use of CT PE also decreased but was not significant (−2%, 95%CI (−9%, +5%); p = 0.42). For all CT types, high utilizers in the pre-period decreased usage over 14% in the post-period with CT brain (−18%, 95% CI (−22%, −15%), p &lt; 0.001), CT c-spine (−14%, 95% CI (−20%, −8%), p = 0.001) and CT PE (−23%, 95% CI (−31%, −14%), p &lt; 0.001). For all 3 studies, the average utilizers did not change their usage practices. For CT brain, the low utilizers also did not increase usage but for CT c-spine and CT PE usage was increased [(+29%, 95% CI (10%, 52%) p = 0.003); (+46%, 95% CI (26%, 70%), p &lt; 0.001) respectively]. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9467184e206">Conclusion</h5> <p id="P4">Embedded clinical decision support is associated with decreased overall utilization of high cost imaging, especially among higher utilizers. It also affected low utilizers, increasing their usage consistent with improved adherence to guidelines, but this effect did not offset the overall decreased utilization for CT brain or CT c-spine. Thus, integrating CDS into the provider workflow promotes usage of validated tools across providers, which can standardize the delivery of care and improve compliance with evidence-based guidelines. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department.

          The role of computed tomography (CT) in acute illnesses has increased substantially in recent years; however, little is known about how CT use in the emergency department (ED) has changed over time. A retrospective study was performed with the 1996 to 2007 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a large nationwide survey of ED services. We assessed changes during this period in CT use during an ED visit, CT use for specific ED presenting complaints, and disposition after CT use. Main outcomes were presented as adjusted risk ratios (RRs). Data from 368,680 patient visits during the 12-year period yielded results for an estimated 1.29 billion weighted ED encounters, among which an estimated 97.1 million (7.5%) patients received at least one CT. Overall, CT use during ED visits increased 330%, from 3.2% of encounters (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9% to 3.6%) in 1996 to 13.9% (95% CI 12.8% to 14.9%) in 2007. Among the 20 most common complaints presenting to the ED, there was universal increase in CT use. Rates of growth were highest for abdominal pain (adjusted RR comparing 2007 to 1996=9.97; 95% CI 7.47 to 12.02), flank pain (adjusted RR 9.24; 95% CI 6.22 to 11.51), chest pain (adjusted RR 5.54; 95% CI 3.75 to 7.53), and shortness of breath (adjusted RR 5.28; 95% CI 2.76 to 8.34). In multivariable modeling, the likelihood of admission or transfer after a CT scan decreased over the years but has leveled off more recently (adjusted RR comparing admission or transfer after CT in 2007 to 1996=0.42; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.55). CT use in the ED has increased significantly in recent years across a broad range of presenting complaints. The increase has been associated with a decline in admissions or transfers after CT use, although this effect has stabilized more recently. Copyright © 2011 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury.

            Two decision rules for indications of computed tomography (CT) in patients with minor head injury, the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) and the New Orleans Criteria (NOC), suggest that CT scanning may be restricted to patients with certain risk factors, which would lead to important reductions in the use of CT scans. To validate and compare these 2 published decision rules in Dutch patients with head injuries. A prospective multicenter study conducted between February 11, 2002, and August 31, 2004, in 4 university hospitals in the Netherlands of 3181 consecutive adult patients with minor head injury who presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 14 or with a GCS score of 15 and at least 1 risk factor. Primary outcome was any neurocranial traumatic finding on CT scan. Secondary outcomes were neurosurgical intervention and clinically important CT findings. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated for each outcome for the CCHR and the NOC, using both rules as originally derived and also as adapted to apply to an expanded patient population. Of 3181 patients with a GCS score of 13 to 15, neurosurgical intervention was performed in 17 patients (0.5%); neurocranial traumatic CT findings were present in 312 patients (9.8%). Sensitivity for neurosurgical intervention was 100% for both the CCHR and the NOC. The NOC had a higher sensitivity for neurocranial traumatic findings and for clinically important findings (97.7%-99.4%) than did the CCHR (83.4%-87.2%). Specificities were very low for the NOC (3.0%-5.6%) and higher for the CCHR (37.2%-39.7%). The estimated potential reduction in CT scans for patients with minor head injury would be 3.0% for the adapted NOC and 37.3% for the adapted CCHR. For patients with minor head injury and a GCS score of 13 to 15, the CCHR has a lower sensitivity than the NOC for neurocranial traumatic or clinically important CT findings, but would identify all cases requiring neurosurgical intervention, and has greater potential for reducing the use of CT scans.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Prospective validation of wells criteria in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Academic Emergency Medicine
                Acad Emerg Med
                Wiley-Blackwell
                10696563
                July 2017
                July 11 2017
                : 24
                : 7
                : 839-845
                Article
                10.1111/acem.13195
                5505794
                28391603
                5bcfb129-d934-4dcf-bab4-8680742eb65d
                © 2017

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content869

                Cited by14

                Most referenced authors166