There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
“Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile.” – Albert Einstein, Nobel Laureate
in Physics, 1921, quoted in The New York Times, June 20, 1932. Einstein archives 29-041
Sureka et al.[1] modelled a suraksha chakra (safety circle) by designing a new scoring
system to protect healthcare workers from COVID. They published the scoring system
in the April 2021 issue of the Journal and assessed implementation of the protocol
in regular and surprise rounds. What its approach is, is that by constantly nudging
our fellow workers, we can motivate them to follow the best practices and hence, in
the process, can protect ourselves and those around us.
Nevertheless, what we infer by observing [Figures 1 and 2] is that members of the
committee have been briefing each other through PowerPoint presentations. While this
presentation has its own limitations and challenges,[2] since middle of 2020 various
scientists have been underscoring the risk of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2
and the resulting higher risk of striking those assembling in enclosed spaces.[3]
Thus, we need to make every possible attempt to avoid sharing a common physical environment
while the novel Coronavirus 2019 lurks in the air in search of a potential host.
While communicating with each other is the need of the hour, in our world, since arrival
of the novel Coronavirus, we need to constantly invent or redesign or restructure
our surroundings so as not to provide favorable conditions for this virus to spread
unabatedly. When we share air in a hall, we would remember that the air we breathe
is communal. Since asymptomatic transmission accounts for somewhere from one-third
to 59% of all transmissions globally, all of us, especially healthcare workers, should
observe all of the COVID-appropriate behaviors at all the times.
As evidence is now emerging that enhancing ventilation in buildings secures the health
of its occupants, we should make appropriate changes in building designs where scores
of occupants constantly breathe common air. Therefore, oral presentation with distribution
of pamphlets, or similar or novel methods of information dissemination are needs of
the hour in open spaces where currents of outdoor air dissipate the concentration
of virus-laden particles in ambient air, subsequently diminishing the possibility
of exposure to its occupants.
Second, the investigators assess members of its team regarding observation of hand
hygiene under a heading ‘H’. Here, we need to inform our fellow workers that practicing
this habit not only saves patients from SARS-CoV-2 infection but also from several
other diseases,[4] some of which are potentially lethal.[5] So while incidence of
fomite-borne transmission can be significantly decreased by frequently washing our
hands, it has to be inculcated in our minds that hospital-acquired infections constitute
an avoidable burden on our health care system. Several ardent supporters of this practice
have shared their experiences, and one common theme among them is that having availability
of running water at an accessible distance is a prerequisite to observing this sanitary
ritual. Such basic points need to be taken into consideration when designing hospital
wards, catering not only to COVID patients but also to non-COVID patients.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Despite the prevalence of PowerPoint in professional and educational presentations, surprisingly little is known about how effective such presentations are. All else being equal, are PowerPoint presentations better than purely oral presentations or those that use alternative software tools? To address this question we recreated a real-world business scenario in which individuals presented to a corporate board. Participants (playing the role of the presenter) were randomly assigned to create PowerPoint, Prezi, or oral presentations, and then actually delivered the presentation live to other participants (playing the role of corporate executives). Across two experiments and on a variety of dimensions, participants evaluated PowerPoint presentations comparably to oral presentations, but evaluated Prezi presentations more favorably than both PowerPoint and oral presentations. There was some evidence that participants who viewed different types of presentations came to different conclusions about the business scenario, but no evidence that they remembered or comprehended the scenario differently. We conclude that the observed effects of presentation format are not merely the result of novelty, bias, experimenter-, or software-specific characteristics, but instead reveal a communication preference for using the panning-and-zooming animations that characterize Prezi presentations.
Title:
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Publisher:
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
(India
)
ISSN
(Print):
2249-4863
ISSN
(Electronic):
2278-7135
Publication date
(Print):
September
2022
Publication date
(Electronic):
14
October
2022
Volume: 11
Issue: 9
Pages: 5718-5719
Affiliations
[1]Department of Medicine, KG’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Author notes
Address for correspondence: Dr. Harish Gupta, Department of Medicine, KG’s Medical University, Lucknow -226 003,
Uttar Pradesh, India. E-mail:
harishgupta@
123456kgmcindia.edu
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others
to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate
credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.