16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Perceiving Freedom: Civil Liberties and COVID-19 Vaccinations

      research-article
      1 , 2
      Political Studies Review
      SAGE Publications
      COVID-19, civil liberties, vaccines

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Why have some countries been more successful in their COVID-19 vaccine rollouts than others? Despite efforts by governments to vaccinate their adult populations against COVID-19, vaccination rates remain irregularly low in some countries. We suggest that a crucial piece of this puzzle lies in resistance against government directives from the public due to civil liberty protections. Countries with greater protections for civil liberties can be expected to have lower vaccinations administered than countries with fewer protections, as the public enjoys a sense of freedom regarding their private lives. In such countries, de jure constraints on government policies are complemented by the fear of public backlash, even in crises; consequently, beyond structural limitations, governments with high levels of civil liberty protections face an additional hurdle in managing the COVID-19 crisis. Evidence for this hypothesis is presented for 153 countries by combining civil liberty scores with newly available data on COVID-19 vaccinations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Specification Tests in Econometrics

          J. Hausman (1978)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study.

            With data from 33 nations, we illustrate the differences between cultures that are tight (have many strong norms and a low tolerance of deviant behavior) versus loose (have weak social norms and a high tolerance of deviant behavior). Tightness-looseness is part of a complex, loosely integrated multilevel system that comprises distal ecological and historical threats (e.g., high population density, resource scarcity, a history of territorial conflict, and disease and environmental threats), broad versus narrow socialization in societal institutions (e.g., autocracy, media regulations), the strength of everyday recurring situations, and micro-level psychological affordances (e.g., prevention self-guides, high regulatory strength, need for structure). This research advances knowledge that can foster cross-cultural understanding in a world of increasing global interdependence and has implications for modeling cultural change.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis

              Background The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis, yet certain countries have had far more success in limiting COVID-19 cases and deaths. We suggest that collective threats require a tremendous amount of coordination, and that strict adherence to social norms is a key mechanism that enables groups to do so. Here we examine how the strength of social norms—or cultural tightness–looseness—was associated with countries' success in limiting cases and deaths by October, 2020. We expected that tight cultures, which have strict norms and punishments for deviance, would have fewer cases and deaths per million as compared with loose cultures, which have weaker norms and are more permissive. Methods We estimated the relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 case and mortality rates as of Oct 16, 2020, using ordinary least squares regression. We fit a series of stepwise models to capture whether cultural tightness–looseness explained variation in case and death rates controlling for under-reporting, demographics, geopolitical factors, other cultural dimensions, and climate. Findings The results indicated that, compared with nations with high levels of cultural tightness, nations with high levels of cultural looseness are estimated to have had 4·99 times the number of cases (7132 per million vs 1428 per million, respectively) and 8·71 times the number of deaths (183 per million vs 21 per million, respectively), taking into account a number of controls. A formal evolutionary game theoretic model suggested that tight groups cooperate much faster under threat and have higher survival rates than loose groups. The results suggest that tightening social norms might confer an evolutionary advantage in times of collective threat. Interpretation Nations that are tight and abide by strict norms have had more success than those that are looser as of the October, 2020. New interventions are needed to help countries tighten social norms as they continue to battle COVID-19 and other collective threats. Funding Office of Naval Research, US Navy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Polit Stud Rev
                Polit Stud Rev
                PSW
                sppsw
                Political Studies Review
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1478-9299
                1478-9302
                1 April 2022
                February 2023
                1 April 2022
                : 21
                : 1
                : 190-209
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Political Science, Albright College, Reading, PA, USA
                [2 ]Department of Political Science, Forman Christian College University, Lahore, Pakistan
                Author notes
                [*]Syed Rashid Munir, Department of Political Science, Forman Christian College University, Canal Bank Road, Lahore 54600, Pakistan. Email: srmunir@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-477X
                Article
                10.1177_14789299221082460
                10.1177/14789299221082460
                10076963
                37038605
                5acf9822-9f7b-4f57-b2f8-0b5225adcaba
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                : 4 February 2022
                Categories
                Early Results
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                covid-19,civil liberties,vaccines
                covid-19, civil liberties, vaccines

                Comments

                Comment on this article