4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      IVF outcomes of embryos with abnormal PGT-A biopsy previously refused transfer: a prospective cohort study

      , , ,
      Human Reproduction
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          STUDY QUESTION

          What are the outcomes for patients who choose to move embryos diagnosed as abnormal by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to a new institution for transfer after the diagnosing institution refused to transfer them?

          SUMMARY ANSWER

          Many patients seek to have selected embryos with PGT-A abnormal trophectoderm biopsies transferred recognizing that these embryos can still offer a chance of pregnancy and live birth.

          WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

          : PGT-A is a widely practiced method of selecting embryos for transfer based on biopsy of a few cells. Many clinical practices refuse to transfer PGT-A abnormal embryos even when there are no other ‘normal’ embryos available.

          STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

          This is a prospective cohort of 69 couples who, since 2014, moved a total of 444 PGT-A abnormal embryos previously refused transfer at their parent institutions to our practice. Among these, 50 patients have, thus far, undergone 57 transfer cycles of 141 embryos.

          PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

          Embryos diagnosed at other institutions by PGT-A as abnormal (mostly using next generation sequencing) were moved to our academically affiliated private fertility and research center in New York City. Female age at retrieval was 41.35 ± 3.98 years, 74% were Caucasian, 12% Asian and 10% were of African descent. All embryos identified as PGT-A abnormal among prospectively identified couples were recorded in our center’s registry.

          MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

          Among the 144 embryos transferred 102 (72.3%) had only 1 or 2 chromosomal abnormalities, 30 (21.3%) had 3 or more and 9 (6.4%) were ‘undiagnosed’ because of degraded DNA, yet still had been refused transfer. Transfer of PGT-A abnormal embryos resulted in 8 live births, 11 miscarriages and no voluntary terminations. One child was born with a segmental duplication and required repair of coarctation of the aorta as a newborn. Many couples with only PGT-A abnormal embryos are willing to have their PGT-A abnormal embryos transferred and such transfers can result in the establishment of ongoing euploid pregnancies and live births.

          LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

          Findings in this case series represent couples who chose to have their embryos transferred after having been refused transfer elsewhere and may not be representative of the wider population of couples undergoing IVF with PGT-A in general. Not all abnormal phenotypes present in the immediate postnatal period so it will be important to continue to follow the development of these children.

          WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

          PGT-A can result in a clinics refusal to transfer embryos with abnormal PGT-A biopsies, even those with mosaic findings, consequently large numbers of infertile women are prematurely advised that their only chance of motherhood is through third-party egg-donation.

          STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

          This work was supported by intramural funds from the Center for Human Reproduction and the not-for-profit research Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, both in New York, NY, USA. N.G. and D.H.B. are listed as co-inventors on several U.S. patents. One of these patents (US Patent# 7,615,544) relates to pre-supplementation of hypo-androgenic infertile women with androgens, such as DHEA and testosterone and, therefore, at least peripherally related to the subject of this manuscript. N.G. and D.F.A. also received travel funds and speaker honoraria from several pharmaceutical and medical device companies, though none related to the here presented subject and manuscript. N.G. is a shareholder in Fertility Nutraceuticals and he and D.H.B. receive royalty payments from Fertility Nutraceuticals LLC.

          TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

          N/A.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans

          Summary Large-scale reference data sets of human genetic variation are critical for the medical and functional interpretation of DNA sequence changes. We describe the aggregation and analysis of high-quality exome (protein-coding region) sequence data for 60,706 individuals of diverse ethnicities generated as part of the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). This catalogue of human genetic diversity contains an average of one variant every eight bases of the exome, and provides direct evidence for the presence of widespread mutational recurrence. We have used this catalogue to calculate objective metrics of pathogenicity for sequence variants, and to identify genes subject to strong selection against various classes of mutation; identifying 3,230 genes with near-complete depletion of truncating variants with 72% having no currently established human disease phenotype. Finally, we demonstrate that these data can be used for the efficient filtering of candidate disease-causing variants, and for the discovery of human “knockout” variants in protein-coding genes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial

            To evaluate the benefit of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) for embryo selection in frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential

              Most human pre-implantation embryos are mosaics of euploid and aneuploid cells. To determine the fate of aneuploid cells and the developmental potential of mosaic embryos, here we generate a mouse model of chromosome mosaicism. By treating embryos with a spindle assembly checkpoint inhibitor during the four- to eight-cell division, we efficiently generate aneuploid cells, resulting in embryo death during peri-implantation development. Live-embryo imaging and single-cell tracking in chimeric embryos, containing aneuploid and euploid cells, reveal that the fate of aneuploid cells depends on lineage: aneuploid cells in the fetal lineage are eliminated by apoptosis, whereas those in the placental lineage show severe proliferative defects. Overall, the proportion of aneuploid cells is progressively depleted from the blastocyst stage onwards. Finally, we show that mosaic embryos have full developmental potential, provided they contain sufficient euploid cells, a finding of significance for the assessment of embryo vitality in the clinic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Human Reproduction
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0268-1161
                1460-2350
                June 01 2022
                May 30 2022
                April 12 2022
                June 01 2022
                May 30 2022
                April 12 2022
                : 37
                : 6
                : 1194-1206
                Article
                10.1093/humrep/deac063
                35413106
                5aaf56da-17e5-4db5-b1b1-5c553a7ea99a
                © 2022

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article