4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      MRI features of pediatric atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors and medulloblastomas of the posterior fossa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) occurs at a younger age and is associated with a worse prognosis than medulloblastoma; however, these two tumor entities are mostly indistinguishable on neuroimaging. The aim of our study was to differentiate AT/RT and medulloblastoma based on their clinical and MRI features to enhance treatment planning and outcome prediction.

          Methods

          From 2005–2021, we retrospectively enrolled 16 patients with histopathologically diagnosed AT/RT and 57 patients with medulloblastoma at our institute. We evaluated their clinical data and MRI findings, including lesion signals, intratumoral morphologies, and peritumoral/distal involvement.

          Results

          The age of children with AT/RT was younger than that of children with medulloblastoma (2.8 ± 4.9 [0–17] vs. 6.5 ± 4.0 [0–18], p < 0.001), and the overall survival rate was lower (21.4% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.005). Regarding lesion signals on MRI, AT/RT had a lower ADC min (cutoff value ≤544.7 × 10 −6 mm 2/s, p < 0.001), a lower ADC ratio (cutoff value ≤0.705, p < 0.001), and a higher DWI ratio (cutoff value ≥1.595, p < 0.001) than medulloblastoma. Regarding intratumoral morphology, the “tumor central vein sign” was mostly exclusive to medulloblastoma (24/57, 42.1%; AT/RT 1/16, 6.3%; p = 0.007). Regarding peritumoral invasion on T2WI, AT/RT was more prone to invasion of the brainstem ( p < 0.001) and middle cerebellar peduncle ( p < 0.001) than medulloblastoma.

          Conclusions

          MRI findings of a lower ADC value, more peritumoral invasion, and absence of the “tumor central vein sign” may be helpful to differentiate AT/RT from medulloblastoma. These distinct MRI findings together with the younger age of AT/RT patients may explain the worse outcomes in AT/RT patients.

          Abstract

          AT/RT occurs in younger patients, has more aggressive clinical behavior and is associated with much worse outcomes than medulloblastoma. On MRI, AT/RT (G‐I) can be differentiated from medulloblastoma (A‐F) by a lower ADC value, more peritumoral invasion, and the absence of the “tumor central vein sign”.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

          The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System is both a conceptual and practical advance over its 2007 predecessor. For the first time, the WHO classification of CNS tumors uses molecular parameters in addition to histology to define many tumor entities, thus formulating a concept for how CNS tumor diagnoses should be structured in the molecular era. As such, the 2016 CNS WHO presents major restructuring of the diffuse gliomas, medulloblastomas and other embryonal tumors, and incorporates new entities that are defined by both histology and molecular features, including glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype and glioblastoma, IDH-mutant; diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant; RELA fusion-positive ependymoma; medulloblastoma, WNT-activated and medulloblastoma, SHH-activated; and embryonal tumour with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered. The 2016 edition has added newly recognized neoplasms, and has deleted some entities, variants and patterns that no longer have diagnostic and/or biological relevance. Other notable changes include the addition of brain invasion as a criterion for atypical meningioma and the introduction of a soft tissue-type grading system for the now combined entity of solitary fibrous tumor / hemangiopericytoma-a departure from the manner by which other CNS tumors are graded. Overall, it is hoped that the 2016 CNS WHO will facilitate clinical, experimental and epidemiological studies that will lead to improvements in the lives of patients with brain tumors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary

            The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS), published in 2021, is the sixth version of the international standard for the classification of brain and spinal cord tumors. Building on the 2016 updated fourth edition and the work of the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy, the 2021 fifth edition introduces major changes that advance the role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification. At the same time, it remains wedded to other established approaches to tumor diagnosis such as histology and immunohistochemistry. In doing so, the fifth edition establishes some different approaches to both CNS tumor nomenclature and grading and it emphasizes the importance of integrated diagnoses and layered reports. New tumor types and subtypes are introduced, some based on novel diagnostic technologies such as DNA methylome profiling. The present review summarizes the major general changes in the 2021 fifth edition classification and the specific changes in each taxonomic category. It is hoped that this summary provides an overview to facilitate more in-depth exploration of the entire fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2.

              Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) has continued to develop into a powerful clinical tool to visualize venous structures and iron in the brain and to study diverse pathologic conditions. SWI offers a unique contrast, different from spin attenuation, T1, T2, and T2* (see Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications, Part 1). In this clinical review (Part 2), we present a variety of neurovascular and neurodegenerative disease applications for SWI, covering trauma, stroke, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, venous anomalies, multiple sclerosis, and tumors. We conclude that SWI often offers complementary information valuable in the diagnosis and potential treatment of patients with neurologic disorders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                fcchang374@gmail.com
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                14 March 2023
                May 2023
                : 12
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.v12.9 )
                : 10449-10461
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Radiology Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan
                [ 2 ] School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei Taiwan
                [ 3 ] Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei Taiwan
                [ 4 ] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan
                [ 5 ] Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan
                [ 6 ] Department of Oncology Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan
                [ 7 ] Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Technology Yuanpei University of Medical Technology Hsinchu City Taiwan
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Feng‐Chi Chang, Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201 Sec. 2, Shih‐Pai Rd., Taipei 11217 Taiwan.

                Email: fcchang374@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3946-7540
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7267-6497
                Article
                CAM45780 CAM4-2022-10-4492.R1
                10.1002/cam4.5780
                10225182
                36916326
                5a9248d3-a100-4a5f-ae4a-f4c65906ee48
                © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 08 February 2023
                : 13 October 2022
                : 25 February 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 3, Pages: 13, Words: 6399
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan , doi 10.13039/501100004663;
                Award ID: MOST 109‐2314‐B‐075‐036
                Award ID: MOST 110‐2314‐B‐075‐005
                Award ID: MOST 110‐2314‐B‐075‐032
                Award ID: MOST 111‐2314‐B‐075‐025‐MY3
                Funded by: Professor Tsuen CHANG's Scholarship Program from Medical Scholarship Foundation In Memory Of Professor Albert Ly‐Young Shen
                Funded by: Taipei Veterans General Hospital , doi 10.13039/501100011912;
                Award ID: V110C‐037
                Award ID: V111B‐032
                Award ID: V111C‐028
                Award ID: V112B‐007
                Award ID: V112C‐059
                Award ID: V112D67‐002‐MY3‐1
                Funded by: Veterans General Hospitals and University System of Taiwan Joint Research Program
                Award ID: VGHUST 109V1‐5‐2
                Award ID: VGHUST 110‐G1‐5‐2
                Funded by: Vivian W. Yen Neurological Foundation
                Funded by: Yen Tjing Ling Medical Foundation , doi 10.13039/501100007354;
                Award ID: CI‐109‐3
                Award ID: CI‐111‐2
                Award ID: CI‐112‐2
                Categories
                Research Article
                RESEARCH ARTICLES
                Clinical Cancer Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.8 mode:remove_FC converted:28.05.2023

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (at/rt),embryonal brain tumor,magnetic resonance imaging (mri),medulloblastoma,pediatric brain tumor

                Comments

                Comment on this article