12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      About the Erd\"{o}s-Hajnal conjecture for seven-vertex tournaments

      Preprint
      ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A celebrated unresolved conjecture of Erd\"{o}s and Hajnal states that for every undirected graph \(H\) there exists \( \epsilon(H) > 0 \) such that every undirected graph on \( n \) vertices that does not contain \(H\) as an induced subgraph contains a clique or a stable set of size at least \( n^{\epsilon(H)} \). The conjecture has a directed equivalent version stating that for every tournament \(H\) there exists \( \epsilon(H) > 0 \) such that every \(H-\)free \(n-\)vertex tournament \(T\) contains a transitive subtournament of order at least \( n^{\epsilon(H)} \). Both the directed and the undirected versions of the conjecture are known to be true for small graphs (tournaments). So far the conjecture was proved only for some specific families of prime tournaments, tournaments constructed according to the so\(-\)called substitution procedure allowing to build bigger graphs, and for all five\(-\)vertex tournaments. Recently the conjecture was proved for all six\(-\)vertex tournament, with one exception, but the question about the correctness of the conjecture for all seven\(-\)vertex tournaments remained open. In this paper we prove the correctness of the conjecture for several seven\(-\)vertex tournaments.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          22 October 2020
          Article
          2010.12331
          5a080f17-a924-416b-92bc-88af7e6e41c6

          http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          math.CO

          Combinatorics
          Combinatorics

          Comments

          Comment on this article