6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Internal Suture Augmentation Technique to Protect the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft

      brief-report
      , M.D. a , , , M.D. b , , M.D. c , , M.D. d , , M.D. a
      Arthroscopy Techniques
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The anterior cruciate ligament suture augmentation technique is a method to augment anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with autologous hamstring tendons using a braided ultrahigh–molecular weight polyester or polyethylene suture or suture tape and fixed on both the femoral and tibial sides independent of the graft to act as a backup or secondary stabilizer until complete integration and ligamentization of the graft take place. The technique is proposed to allow early rehabilitation and return to sports after ACLR and may be advantageous in patients with a high body mass index and in cases with small grafts (7 or 7.5 mm in diameter). In such situations the technique is supposed to decrease the risk of reinjury, as well as the degree of postoperative lengthening or stretching of the graft, in the early postoperative avascular phase. We describe graft preparation with the internal suture augmentation technique in arthroscopic ACLR using a cortical button system on the femoral side and a Bio-Interference Screw (Arthrex, Naples, FL) on the tibial side.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study.

          There has been an intensive research effort directed at determining the cause of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury over the past decade, but few studies have reported data on the incidence of ACL and other knee ligament injury in the general population. New Zealand's no-fault injury compensation data provides a national injury resource of data on claims for knee ligament injury. The goal of this paper was to provide a descriptive epidemiology of knee ligament injury in this country. Data were obtained for knee ligament injuries between 1 July 2000 and 30 June 2005. Injuries were categorised as non-surgical (NS), ACL surgeries (ACLS) and other knee ligament surgeries (OKLS). Incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were computed using population estimates. Costs and number of treatment/rehabilitation visits were obtained as an indication of severity. The incidence rate per 100,000 person-years was 1147.1 for NS, 36.9 for ACLS and 9.1 for OKLS. Males had a higher incidence rate than females for NS, ACLS, and OKLS. The mean (and median) number of treatment visits were NS: 6.6 (4), ACLS: 27.1 (24), and OKLS: 31.3 (24). The mean (median) treatment costs of these injuries were NS $885 ($129), ACLS $11,157 ($8574), and OKLS $15,663 ($8054). Analysis of injury descriptions for ACLS injuries indicated that 58% involved a non-contact mechanism of injury. These data underscore the high level of short-term disability associated with knee ligament injuries, especially ACL injuries that require surgery.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort.

            Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has worse outcomes than primary reconstructions. Predictors for these worse outcomes are not known. The Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Group was developed to perform a multisurgeon, multicenter prospective longitudinal study to obtain sufficient subjects to allow multivariable analysis to determine predictors of clinical outcome.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

              Revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) introduces several diagnostic and technical challenges in comparison with primary ACL reconstruction. With the increasing numbers of original reconstructions combined with the continued expectation of high-level athletic participation, revision ACL reconstruction is likely to become more frequent. The purpose of this article was to summarize the causes of failure and the evaluation of the patient with recurrent instability. A review of the literature regarding results after revision ACL reconstruction was performed to assist in the decision-making process and patient counseling. Good results can be obtained in terms of functional stability after revision reconstruction, but chondral and meniscal injury as well as unrecognized associated pathologic instability may play a role in diminished outcomes. In addition, a wide variety of surgical techniques are reviewed to address problems associated with tunnel malposition, widening, and pre-existing hardware.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Arthrosc Tech
                Arthrosc Tech
                Arthroscopy Techniques
                Elsevier
                2212-6287
                18 September 2017
                October 2017
                18 September 2017
                : 6
                : 5
                : e1633-e1638
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mansoura University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
                [b ]Joint Center, Orthopedic Department, October 6 University, 6th of October, Egypt
                [c ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Benha University Hospital, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
                [d ]Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
                Author notes
                []Address correspondence to Mohamed Aboalata, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mansoura University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryMansoura University HospitalsFaculty of MedicineMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt orthopaedist@ 123456hotmail.co.uk
                Article
                S2212-6287(17)30185-8
                10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.020
                5795625
                29416962
                59faabf5-0dce-42a8-919c-46a16b6cdedf
                © 2017 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the Arthroscopy Association of North America.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 25 December 2016
                : 20 June 2017
                Categories
                Technical Note

                Comments

                Comment on this article