2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Clinical Impact of Low-Volume Lymph Nodal Metastases in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: The Senticol 1 and Senticol 2 Trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: With the development of the sentinel node technique in early-stage cervical cancer, it is imperative to define the clinical significance of micrometastases (MICs) and isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Methods: We included all patients who participated in the Senticol 1 and Senticol 2 studies. We analyzed the factors associated with the presence of low-volume metastasis, the oncological outcomes of patients with MIC and ITC and the correlation of recurrences and risk factors. Results: Twenty-four patients (7.5%) had low-volume metastasis. The risk factors associated with the presence of low-volume metastasis were a higher stage ( p = 0.02) and major stromal invasion ( p = 0.01) in the univariate analysis. The maximum specificity and sensitivity were found at a cutoff of 8 mm of stromal invasion. In multivariate analysis, the higher stage ( p = 0.02) and the positive lymphovascular space invasion ( p = 0.02) were significantly associated with the MIC and ITC. Patients with low-volume metastasis had similar disease-free survival (DFS) (92.7%) to node-negative patients (93.6%). The addition of adjuvant treatment in presence of low-volume metastasis did not modify the DFS. Conclusions: These results confirm our previous analysis of Senticol 1: the presence of low-volume metastasis did not decrease the DFS in early-stage cervical cancer patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Classification of radical hysterectomy.

              Since the first publications about surgery for cervical cancer, many radical procedures that accord with different degrees of radicality have been described and done. Here, we propose a basis for a new and simple classification for cervical-cancer surgery, taking into account the curative effect of surgery and adverse effects, such as bladder dysfunction. The international anatomical nomenclature is used where it applies. For simplification, the classification is based only on lateral extent of resection. We describe four types of radical hysterectomy (A-D), adding when necessary a few subtypes that consider nerve preservation and paracervical lymphadenectomy. Lymph-node dissection is considered separately: four levels (1-4) are defined according to corresponding arterial anatomy and radicality of the procedure. The classification applies to fertility-sparing surgery, and can be adapted to open, vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery. In the future, internationally standardised description of techniques for communication, comparison, clinical research, and quality control will be a basic part of every surgical procedure.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                25 April 2020
                May 2020
                : 12
                : 5
                : 1061
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Gynecologic Department, CHU Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
                [2 ]Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
                [3 ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris, 75006 Paris, France
                [4 ]Epidemiology and Research Department, Hospital of Lyon, 69003 Lyon, France
                [5 ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1, F-69008 Lyon, France
                [6 ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Saint-Étienne, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
                [7 ]Breast, Gynecology and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Curie Institute, 75248 Paris, France
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-3734
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-239X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2973-410X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4071-3932
                Article
                cancers-12-01061
                10.3390/cancers12051061
                7281258
                32344814
                59e68a85-ba14-499c-a42e-546c323f2c3d
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 March 2020
                : 23 April 2020
                Categories
                Article

                cervical cancer,micrometastases,sentinel lymph node
                cervical cancer, micrometastases, sentinel lymph node

                Comments

                Comment on this article