2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analysis of Severe Illness After Postvaccination COVID-19 Breakthrough Among Adults With and Without HIV in the US

      research-article
      , MD, MSc 1 , 2 , , MPH 1 , , PhD, MPH 1 , , MD, MAS 3 , , MPH 3 , , BA 3 , , MIT 3 , , PhD, MPH 4 , , PhD, MS 5 , 6 , , MD, MS 5 , 6 , , MD, PhD 5 , 6 , 7 , , PhD 8 , 9 , , PhD, MSPH 8 , , BA 9 , , MS 9 , , PhD, MPH 10 , , MD 10 , 11 , , MPH 10 , , MS 1 , , MPH 1 , , MD, MPH 1 , 12 , , MD 13 , 14 , 15 , , PhD 16 , , PhD, MPH 1 ,
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          In 2021, among fully vaccinated people with breakthrough COVID-19 illness, was the risk of severe illness higher for people with HIV (PWH) compared with people without HIV (PWoH)?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 3649 patients with breakthrough COVID-19, there was no overall difference in risk of severe disease between PWH and PWoH. PWH with CD4 cell count less than 350 cells/μL had a 59% increased risk of severe breakthrough illness compared with PWoH.

          Meaning

          Although vaccinations effectively reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 illness in both PWH and PWoH, these findings suggest that PWH with moderate or severe immune suppression (CD4 cell count <350 cells/μL) could be at higher risk of severe breakthrough infection compared with PWoH, and PWH with moderate immune suppression should be considered for additional vaccine dosages and other risk-reduction measures.

          Abstract

          This cohort study estimates the rate and risk of severe breakthrough COVID-19 illness among vaccinated people with HIV and people without HIV who experience a breakthrough infection.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Understanding the severity of postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 (ie, COVID-19) breakthrough illness among people with HIV (PWH) can inform vaccine guidelines and risk-reduction recommendations.

          Objective

          To estimate the rate and risk of severe breakthrough illness among vaccinated PWH and people without HIV (PWoH) who experience a breakthrough infection.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          In this cohort study, the Corona-Infectious-Virus Epidemiology Team (CIVET-II) collaboration included adults (aged ≥18 years) with HIV who were receiving care and were fully vaccinated by June 30, 2021, along with PWoH matched according to date fully vaccinated, age group, race, ethnicity, and sex from 4 US integrated health systems and academic centers. Those with postvaccination COVID-19 breakthrough before December 31, 2021, were eligible.

          Exposures

          HIV infection.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The main outcome was severe COVID-19 breakthrough illness, defined as hospitalization within 28 days after a breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection with a primary or secondary COVID-19 discharge diagnosis. Discrete time proportional hazards models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs of severe breakthrough illness within 28 days of breakthrough COVID-19 by HIV status adjusting for demographic variables, COVID-19 vaccine type, and clinical factors. The proportion of patients who received mechanical ventilation or died was compared by HIV status.

          Results

          Among 3649 patients with breakthrough COVID-19 (1241 PWH and 2408 PWoH), most were aged 55 years or older (2182 patients [59.8%]) and male (3244 patients [88.9%]). The cumulative incidence of severe illness in the first 28 days was low and comparable between PWoH and PWH (7.3% vs 6.7%; risk difference, −0.67%; 95% CI, −2.58% to 1.23%). The risk of severe breakthrough illness was 59% higher in PWH with CD4 cell counts less than 350 cells/μL compared with PWoH (aHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.99 to 2.46; P = .049). In multivariable analyses among PWH, being female, older, having a cancer diagnosis, and lower CD4 cell count were associated with increased risk of severe breakthrough illness, whereas previous COVID-19 was associated with reduced risk. Among 249 hospitalized patients, 24 (9.6%) were mechanically ventilated and 20 (8.0%) died, with no difference by HIV status.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cohort study, the risk of severe COVID-19 breakthrough illness within 28 days of a breakthrough infection was low among vaccinated PWH and PWoH. PWH with moderate or severe immune suppression had a higher risk of severe breakthrough infection and should be included in groups prioritized for additional vaccine doses and risk-reduction strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

          Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine

            Abstract Background Vaccines are needed to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and to protect persons who are at high risk for complications. The mRNA-1273 vaccine is a lipid nanoparticle–encapsulated mRNA-based vaccine that encodes the prefusion stabilized full-length spike protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes Covid-19. Methods This phase 3 randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 99 centers across the United States. Persons at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection or its complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two intramuscular injections of mRNA-1273 (100 μg) or placebo 28 days apart. The primary end point was prevention of Covid-19 illness with onset at least 14 days after the second injection in participants who had not previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Results The trial enrolled 30,420 volunteers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vaccine or placebo (15,210 participants in each group). More than 96% of participants received both injections, and 2.2% had evidence (serologic, virologic, or both) of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline. Symptomatic Covid-19 illness was confirmed in 185 participants in the placebo group (56.5 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7 to 65.3) and in 11 participants in the mRNA-1273 group (3.3 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0); vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3 to 96.8%; P<0.001). Efficacy was similar across key secondary analyses, including assessment 14 days after the first dose, analyses that included participants who had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline, and analyses in participants 65 years of age or older. Severe Covid-19 occurred in 30 participants, with one fatality; all 30 were in the placebo group. Moderate, transient reactogenicity after vaccination occurred more frequently in the mRNA-1273 group. Serious adverse events were rare, and the incidence was similar in the two groups. Conclusions The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals

              Summary Understanding adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is important for vaccine development, interpreting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pathogenesis, and calibration of pandemic control measures. Using HLA class I and II predicted peptide ‘megapools’, circulating SARS-CoV-2−specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were identified in ∼70% and 100% of COVID-19 convalescent patients, respectively. CD4+ T cell responses to spike, the main target of most vaccine efforts, were robust and correlated with the magnitude of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA titers. The M, spike and N proteins each accounted for 11-27% of the total CD4+ response, with additional responses commonly targeting nsp3, nsp4, ORF3a and ORF8, among others. For CD8+ T cells, spike and M were recognized, with at least eight SARS-CoV-2 ORFs targeted. Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2−reactive CD4+ T cells in ∼40-60% of unexposed individuals, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘common cold’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                13 October 2022
                October 2022
                13 October 2022
                : 5
                : 10
                : e2236397
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
                [2 ]Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
                [3 ]Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States, Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, Rockville, Maryland
                [4 ]Stanford Center for Population Health Sciences, Palo Alto, California
                [5 ]VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven
                [6 ]Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
                [7 ]Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
                [8 ]Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
                [9 ]Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
                [10 ]Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
                [11 ]Department of Infectious Diseases, Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California
                [12 ]Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
                [13 ]Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
                [14 ]Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
                [15 ]Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia
                [16 ]Epidemiology Branch, Division of AIDS at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, Rockville, Maryland
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: August 24, 2022.
                Published: October 13, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36397
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Lang R et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Keri N. Althoff, PhD, MPH, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Rm E7142, Baltimore, MD 20295 ( kalthoff@ 123456jh.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Ms Humes and Dr Althoff had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Lang, Fathi, Park, Justice, Napravnik, Marconi, Williams, Althoff.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Lang, Humes, Coburn, Horberg, Watson, Jefferson, Park, Gordon, Akgün, Justice, Napravnik, Edwards, Browne, Agil, Silverberg, Skarbinski, Leyden, Stewart, Hogan, Gebo, Marconi, Althoff.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Lang, Coburn, Horberg, Fathi, Marconi.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Lang, Humes, Coburn, Horberg, Watson, Jefferson, Park, Gordon, Akgün, Justice, Napravnik, Edwards, Browne, Agil, Silverberg, Skarbinski, Leyden, Stewart, Hogan, Gebo, Marconi, Williams, Althoff.
                Statistical analysis: Lang, Humes, Coburn, Justice, Napravnik, Edwards, Leyden, Althoff.
                Obtained funding: Justice, Napravnik, Althoff.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Fathi, Park, Gordon, Akgün, Justice, Napravnik, Edwards, Browne, Agil, Skarbinski, Leyden, Stewart, Hogan, Gebo.
                Supervision: Justice, Napravnik, Marconi, Williams, Althoff.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lang reported receiving grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Alberta Innovates, and the University of Calgary paid to their institution. Dr Horberg reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) paid to their institution. Ms Jefferson reported receiving grants from the NIH paid to their institution. Dr Park reported receiving grants from the NIH paid to their institution. Dr Napravnik reported receiving grants from the NIH paid to their institution. Dr Edwards reported receiving grants from the NIH paid to their institution. Ms Browne reported receiving grants from the NIH paid to their institution. Dr Skarbinski reported receiving grants from the NIH paid to their institution. Dr Gebo reported receiving grants from the NIH and Department of Defense paid to their institution. Dr Marconi has received investigator-initiated research grants (to the institution) and consultation fees (both unrelated to the current work) from Eli Lilly, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, and ViiV. Dr Althoff reported receiving grants from the NIH paid to their institution and serving as a consultant to the All of Us Research Program (NIH), TrioHealth, Kennedy Dundas, and MedIQ (fees paid to her). No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This project was made possible with supplemental funds to the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD, U01AI069918) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The NA-ACCORD is supported by NIH grants U01AI069918, F31AI124794, F31DA037788, G12MD007583, K01AI093197, K01AI131895, K23EY013707, K24AI065298, K24AI118591, K24DA000432, KL2TR000421, N01CP01004, N02CP055504, N02CP91027, P30AI027757, P30AI027763, P30AI027767, P30AI036219, P30AI050409, P30AI050410, P30AI094189, P30AI110527, P30MH62246, R01AA016893, R01DA011602, R01DA012568, R01AG053100, R24AI067039, R34DA045592, U01AA013566, U01AA020790, U01AI038855, U01AI038858, U01AI068634, U01AI068636, U01AI069432, U01AI069434, U01DA036297, U01DA036935, U10EY008057, U10EY008052, U10EY008067, U01HL146192, U01HL146193, U01HL146194, U01HL146201, U01HL146202, U01HL146203, U01HL146204, U01HL146205, U01HL146208, U01HL146240, U01HL146241, U01HL146242, U01HL146245, U01HL146333, U24AA020794, U54GM133807, UL1RR024131, UL1TR000004, UL1TR000083, UL1TR002378, UL1TR002489, Z01CP010214 and Z01CP010176; contracts CDC-200-2006-18797 and CDC-200-2015-63931 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); contract 90047713 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; contract 90051652 from the Health Resources and Services Administration; the Grady Health System; grants CBR-86906, CBR-94036, HCP-97105, and TGF-96118 from the CIHR; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care; and the Government of Alberta, Canada. Additional support was provided by the NIAID, National Cancer Institute, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institute for Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, Department of Veterans Affairs, or the CDC.
                Article
                zoi221032 zoi221032
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36397
                9561947
                36227594
                59c2e4d7-7791-4c80-8b43-734283f861d3
                Copyright 2022 Lang R et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 18 May 2022
                : 24 August 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Public Health

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content351

                Cited by12

                Most referenced authors1,325