9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical Implications of Identifying Pathogenic Variants in Individuals With Thoracic Aortic Dissection

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Thoracic aortic dissection is an emergent life-threatening condition. Routine screening for genetic variants causing thoracic aortic dissection is not currently performed for patients or family members.

          Methods:

          We performed whole exome sequencing of 240 patients with thoracic aortic dissection (n=235) or rupture (n=5) and 258 controls matched for age, sex, and ancestry. Blinded to case-control status, we annotated variants in 11 genes for pathogenicity.

          Results:

          Twenty-four pathogenic variants in 6 genes (COL3A1, FBN1, LOX, PRKG1, SMAD3, and TGFBR2) were identified in 26 individuals, representing 10.8% of aortic cases and 0% of controls. Among dissection cases, we compared those with pathogenic variants to those without and found that pathogenic variant carriers had significantly earlier onset of dissection (41 versus 57 years), higher rates of root aneurysm (54% versus 30%), less hypertension (15% versus 57%), lower rates of smoking (19% versus 45%), and greater incidence of aortic disease in family members. Multivariable logistic regression showed that pathogenic variant carrier status was significantly associated with age <50 (odds ratio [OR], 5.5; 95% CI, 1.6–19.7), no history of hypertension (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.4–22.3), and family history of aortic disease (mother: OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.4–22.3, siblings: OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.1–23.9, children: OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.4–26.7).

          Conclusions:

          Clinical genetic testing of known hereditary thoracic aortic dissection genes should be considered in patients with a thoracic aortic dissection, followed by cascade screening of family members, especially in patients with age-of-onset <50 years, family history of thoracic aortic disease, and no history of hypertension.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community.

            Bicuspid aortic valve is frequent and is reported to cause numerous complications, but the clinical outcome of patients diagnosed with normal or mildly dysfunctional valve is undefined. In 212 asymptomatic community residents from Olmsted County, Minn (age, 32+/-20 years; 65% male), bicuspid aortic valve was diagnosed between 1980 and 1999 with ejection fraction > or =50% and aortic regurgitation or stenosis, absent or mild. Aortic valve degeneration at diagnosis was scored echocardiographically for calcification, thickening, and mobility reduction (0 to 3 each), with scores ranging from 0 to 9. At diagnosis, ejection fraction was 63+/-5% and left ventricular diameter was 48+/-9 mm. Survival 20 years after diagnosis was 90+/-3%, identical to the general population (P=0.72). Twenty years after diagnosis, heart failure, new cardiac symptoms, and cardiovascular medical events occurred in 7+/-2%, 26+/-4%, and 33+/-5%, respectively. Twenty years after diagnosis, aortic valve surgery, ascending aortic surgery, or any cardiovascular surgery was required in 24+/-4%, 5+/-2%, and 27+/-4% at a younger age than the general population (P or =50 years (risk ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 5.7; P 70% events at 20 years). Baseline ascending aorta > or =40 mm independently predicted surgery for aorta dilatation (risk ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 77.3; P<0.01). In the community, asymptomatic patients with bicuspid aortic valve and no or minimal hemodynamic abnormality enjoy excellent long-term survival but incur frequent cardiovascular events, particularly with progressive valve dysfunction. Echocardiographic valve degeneration at diagnosis separates higher-risk patients who require regular assessment from lower-risk patients who require only episodic follow-up.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Acute aortic dissection: population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture.

              To ascertain whether acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains the most common aortic catastrophe, as generally believed, and to detect any improvement in outcomes compared with previously reported population-based data. We determined the incidence, operative intervention rate, and long-term survival rate of Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with a clinical diagnosis of AAD initially made between 1980 and 1994. The incidence of degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) rupture was also delineated. We compared these results with other population-based studies of AAD, degenerative TAA, and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture. During a 15-year period, we identified 177 patients with thoracic aortic disease. We focused on 39 patients with AAD (22% of the entire cohort) and 28 with TAA rupture (16%). The annual age- and sex-adjusted incidences were 3.5 per 100,000 persons (95% confidence interval, 2.4-4.6) for AAD and 3.5 per 100,000 persons (95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.9) for TAA rupture. Thirty-three dissections (85%) involved the ascending aorta, whereas 6 (15%) involved only the descending aorta. Nineteen patients (49%) underwent 22 operations for AAD, with a 30-day case fatality rate of 9%. Among all 39 patients with AAD, median survival was only 3 days. Overall 5-year survival for those with AAD improved to 32% compared with only 5% in this community between 1951 and 1980. In other studies, the annual incidences of TAA rupture and AAA rupture are estimated at approximately 3 and 9 per 100,000 persons, respectively. This study indicates that AAD and ruptured degenerative TAA occur with similar frequency but less commonly than ruptured AAA. Although timely recognition and management remain problematic, these new data suggest that recent diagnostic and operative advances are improving long-term survival in AAD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
                Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                2574-8300
                2574-8300
                June 2019
                June 2019
                : 12
                : 6
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Michigan (B.N.W., W.E.H., L.F., J.M., A.D., X.W., M.R.M., S.K.G., N.J.D., C.M.B., J.K., Y.E.C., K.K., G.M.D., H.P., K.A.E., C.J.W., B.Y.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
                [2 ]Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics (B.N.W., C.J.W.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
                [3 ]Department of Internal Medicine (W.E.H., J.M., S.K.G., K.A.E., C.J.W.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
                [4 ]Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) (D.G., D.M.M.).
                [5 ]Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (W.Z.).
                [6 ]Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research and Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA (W.Z.).
                [7 ]Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte (M.L.).
                [8 ]Department of Cardiac Surgery (L.F., X.W., K.K., G.M.D., H.P., B.Y.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
                [9 ]Office of Research—Precision Health, Ann Arbor, MI (A.D.).
                [10 ]Open Targets, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom (E.M.S.).
                [11 ]Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE (E.L.N.).
                [12 ]Department of Anesthesiology (M.R.M., N.J.D., C.M.B.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
                [13 ]Department of Human Genetics (S.K.G., J.K., C.J.W.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
                [14 ]Department of Pharmacology (Y.E.C.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
                [15 ]Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology (Y.E.C.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCGEN.118.002476
                6582991
                31211624
                59806d98-a2d7-45c6-a157-3a60b4029893
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article