4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neurobiological Sex Differences in Developmental Dyslexia

      research-article
      1 , * , 2
      Frontiers in Psychology
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      dyslexia, sex differences, reading, neuroanatomy, genetics

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Understanding sex differences at the neurobiological level has become increasingly crucial in both basic and applied research. In the study of developmental dyslexia, early neuroimaging investigations were dominated by male-only or male-dominated samples, due at least in part to males being diagnosed more frequently. While recent studies more consistently balance the inclusion of both sexes, there has been little movement toward directly characterizing potential sex differences of the disorder. However, a string of recent work suggests that the brain basis of dyslexia may indeed be different in males and females. This potential sex difference has implications for existing models of dyslexia, and would inform approaches to the remediation of reading difficulties. This article reviews recent evidence for sex differences in dyslexia, discusses the impact these studies have on the understanding of the brain basis of dyslexia, and provides a framework for how these differential neuroanatomical profiles may develop.

          Related collections

          Most cited references114

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language.

          Does literacy improve brain function? Does it also entail losses? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we measured brain responses to spoken and written language, visual faces, houses, tools, and checkers in adults of variable literacy (10 were illiterate, 22 became literate as adults, and 31 were literate in childhood). As literacy enhanced the left fusiform activation evoked by writing, it induced a small competition with faces at this location, but also broadly enhanced visual responses in fusiform and occipital cortex, extending to area V1. Literacy also enhanced phonological activation to speech in the planum temporale and afforded a top-down activation of orthography from spoken inputs. Most changes occurred even when literacy was acquired in adulthood, emphasizing that both childhood and adult education can profoundly refine cortical organization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence.

            Human total brain size is consistently reported to be approximately 8-10% larger in males, although consensus on regionally specific differences is weak. Here, in the largest longitudinal pediatric neuroimaging study reported to date (829 scans from 387 subjects, ages 3 to 27 years), we demonstrate the importance of examining size-by-age trajectories of brain development rather than group averages across broad age ranges when assessing sexual dimorphism. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) we found robust male/female differences in the shapes of trajectories with total cerebral volume peaking at age 10.5 in females and 14.5 in males. White matter increases throughout this 24-year period with males having a steeper rate of increase during adolescence. Both cortical and subcortical gray matter trajectories follow an inverted U shaped path with peak sizes 1 to 2 years earlier in females. These sexually dimorphic trajectories confirm the importance of longitudinal data in studies of brain development and underline the need to consider sex matching in studies of brain development.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A definition of dyslexia

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                11 January 2019
                2018
                : 9
                : 2669
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Psychology Department, Dominican University , River Forest, IL, United States
                [2] 2Center for Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning, Curry School of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, VA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Martijn Baart, Tilburg University, Netherlands

                Reviewed by: Dianne Newbury, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Jing Zhao, Capital Normal University, China

                *Correspondence: Anthony J. Krafnick, akrafnick@ 123456dom.edu

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02669
                6336691
                30687153
                5962aea5-dfe1-48d3-9955-570c07eea3b2
                Copyright © 2019 Krafnick and Evans.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 October 2018
                : 12 December 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 131, Pages: 14, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation 10.13039/501100008982
                Categories
                Psychology
                Conceptual Analysis

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                dyslexia,sex differences,reading,neuroanatomy,genetics
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                dyslexia, sex differences, reading, neuroanatomy, genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article