8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      More Physical Activity, More Work Engagement? A Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Promoting employees’ leisure-time and total physical activity may promote work engagement although this needs to be confirmed in longitudinal studies. Even light physical activity may foster work engagement, possibly by promoting general psychological well-being and recovery from work. Both self-reported and accelerometer-based physical activity are related to higher work engagement.

          Objective

          To examine the role of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SED) for work engagement.

          Methods

          We used data from Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study ( n = 3046 to 4356) to analyze self-reported weekly leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), daily leisure-time sitting time (LTST) and work engagement. PA and SED 24-hour were also measured with accelerometer for 14 days. The data were analyzed using linear regression analyses.

          Results

          High self-reported LTPA and sports participation were associated with higher work engagement and its subdimensions. High self-reported ST was associated with lower work engagement, vigor, and absorption. Accelerometer-measured light PA was associated with higher work engagement and vigor, and accelerometermeasured steps were linked to higher vigor. Accelerometer-measured SED was associated with lower work engagement, vigor, and dedication.

          Conclusions

          Self-reported and accelerometer-measured PA and SED may play a role in people’s work engagement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

          Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects

              The Lancet, 380(9838), 247-257
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Occup Environ Med
                J Occup Environ Med
                JOEM
                Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                1076-2752
                1536-5948
                July 2022
                8 March 2022
                : 64
                : 7
                : 541-549
                Affiliations
                [1]From the Unit of Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (Dr Kiema-Junes and Dr Hintsanen); Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (Dr Saarinen); Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Oulu Deaconess Institute Foundation sr, Oulu, Finland; Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oulu and University of Hospital of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (Dr Korpelainen and Dr Pyky); Northern Finland Birth Cohorts, Arctic Biobank, Infrastructure for Population Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (Dr Kangas); Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (Dr Ala-Mursula).
                Author notes
                [*]Address correspondence to: Heli Kiema-Junes, PhD, Faculty of Education, P.O. Box 2000, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland ( heli.kiema@ 123456oulu.fi ).
                Article
                JOEM_220104 00001
                10.1097/JOM.0000000000002530
                9301987
                35260539
                594648c6-142d-46d4-8153-6fd48c1edab7
                Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                CME
                TRUE
                T

                accelerometer-measured,leisure time,physical activity,sedentary behavior,sitting time,work engagement

                Comments

                Comment on this article