33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Two new glassfrogs (Centrolenidae: Hyalinobatrachium) from Ecuador, with comments on the endangered biodiversity of the Andes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Tropical Andes is the world’s most biodiverse hotspot. This region contains >1,000 amphibian species, more than half of which are endemic. Herein we describe two new glassfrog species (Centrolenidae: Hyalinobatrachium) that we discovered within relatively unexplored and isolated localities of the Ecuadorian Andes.

          Methods

          We employed morphological, acoustic, and molecular methods to test the hypothesis that Hyalinobatrachium mashpi sp. nov and H. nouns sp. nov. are species new to science. Following standard methods, we generated mitochondrial sequences (16S) of 37 individuals in the genus Hyalinobatrachium. We inferred the phylogenetic relationships of the two new species in comparison to all other glassfrogs using Maximum Likelihood. In addition to describing the call of H. mashpi sp. nov., we performed a discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) with the advertisement call characteristics of several congeners.

          Results

          Based on an integrative taxonomy approach, we describe two new species. Morphological traits and the inferred phylogeny unambiguously place the new taxa in the genus Hyalinobatrachium. Both species are distinguished from other glassfrogs mainly by their dorsal coloration ( i.e., dorsum lime green with small light yellow spots, head usually with interorbital bar) and transparent pericardium ( i.e., the heart is visible through the ventral skin). The new species exhibit a high morphological similarity ( i.e., cryptic) and occur within relatively close geographical proximity (closest aerial distance = 18.9 km); however, their uncorrected p distance for the mitochondrial gene 16S is 4.6–4.7%, a value that greatly exceeds the genetic distance between closely related species of centrolenid frogs. The DAPC revealed that the advertisement call of H. mashpi sp. nov. is acoustically distinct.

          Discussion

          Our findings are congruent with several previous studies that report a high degree of endemism in the Toisán mountain range, which appears to be isolated from the main Andean cordillera for some amphibian groups. We recommend that both H. mashpi sp. nov. and H. nouns sp. nov. be listed as Endangered, following IUCN criteria. These new species provide another example of cryptic diversity in the Andes—further evidence that the region fosters much more biodiversity than we have the resources to catalog. Threatened by mining and other exploitative industries, these glassfrogs and many other yet-to-be-discovered Andean species highlight the dire need for effective conservation measures—especially in northwestern Ecuador.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

          Conservationists are far from able to assist all species under threat, if only for lack of funding. This places a premium on priorities: how can we support the most species at the least cost? One way is to identify 'biodiversity hotspots' where exceptional concentrations of endemic species are undergoing exceptional loss of habitat. As many as 44% of all species of vascular plants and 35% of all species in four vertebrate groups are confined to 25 hotspots comprising only 1.4% of the land surface of the Earth. This opens the way for a 'silver bullet' strategy on the part of conservation planners, focusing on these hotspots in proportion to their share of the world's species at risk.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations

            Background The dramatic progress in sequencing technologies offers unprecedented prospects for deciphering the organization of natural populations in space and time. However, the size of the datasets generated also poses some daunting challenges. In particular, Bayesian clustering algorithms based on pre-defined population genetics models such as the STRUCTURE or BAPS software may not be able to cope with this unprecedented amount of data. Thus, there is a need for less computer-intensive approaches. Multivariate analyses seem particularly appealing as they are specifically devoted to extracting information from large datasets. Unfortunately, currently available multivariate methods still lack some essential features needed to study the genetic structure of natural populations. Results We introduce the Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC), a multivariate method designed to identify and describe clusters of genetically related individuals. When group priors are lacking, DAPC uses sequential K-means and model selection to infer genetic clusters. Our approach allows extracting rich information from genetic data, providing assignment of individuals to groups, a visual assessment of between-population differentiation, and contribution of individual alleles to population structuring. We evaluate the performance of our method using simulated data, which were also analyzed using STRUCTURE as a benchmark. Additionally, we illustrate the method by analyzing microsatellite polymorphism in worldwide human populations and hemagglutinin gene sequence variation in seasonal influenza. Conclusions Analysis of simulated data revealed that our approach performs generally better than STRUCTURE at characterizing population subdivision. The tools implemented in DAPC for the identification of clusters and graphical representation of between-group structures allow to unravel complex population structures. Our approach is also faster than Bayesian clustering algorithms by several orders of magnitude, and may be applicable to a wider range of datasets.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The integrative future of taxonomy

              Background Taxonomy is the biological discipline that identifies, describes, classifies and names extant and extinct species and other taxa. Nowadays, species taxonomy is confronted with the challenge to fully incorporate new theory, methods and data from disciplines that study the origin, limits and evolution of species. Results Integrative taxonomy has been proposed as a framework to bring together these conceptual and methodological developments. Here we review perspectives for an integrative taxonomy that directly bear on what species are, how they can be discovered, and how much diversity is on Earth. Conclusions We conclude that taxonomy needs to be pluralistic to improve species discovery and description, and to develop novel protocols to produce the much-needed inventory of life in a reasonable time. To cope with the large number of candidate species revealed by molecular studies of eukaryotes, we propose a classification scheme for those units that will facilitate the subsequent assembly of data sets for the formal description of new species under the Linnaean system, and will ultimately integrate the activities of taxonomists and molecular biologists.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Diego, USA )
                2167-8359
                18 March 2022
                2022
                : 10
                : e13109
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, Instituto Biósfera, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ , Quito, Ecuador
                [2 ]Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
                [3 ]Third Millennium Alliance , Quito, Ecuador
                [4 ]Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley , Berkeley, California, United States
                [5 ]Division of Behavioral Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
                [6 ]Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, Instituto Biósfera, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ , Quito, Ecuador
                [7 ]Biology & Research Department, Mashpi Lodge , Mashpi, Ecuador
                [8 ]Tropical Herping , Quito, Ecuador
                [9 ]The Biodiversity Group , Tucson, Arizona, United States
                [10 ]Photo Wildlife Tours , Quito, Ecuador
                [11 ]Fundación Cóndor Andino , Quito, Ecuador
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0098-978X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-5994
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-6605
                Article
                13109
                10.7717/peerj.13109
                8935995
                35321409
                592d301a-502d-4a65-9589-53628de7f628
                © 2022 Guayasamin et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 19 October 2021
                : 22 February 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Universidad San Francisco de Quito (HUBI)
                Award ID: 5467, 5466, 11164 and 16871
                Funded by: Programa Inédita from Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
                Funded by: São Paulo Research Foundation FAPESP, Brazil
                Award ID: 2018/09852-3
                Funded by: Swiss National Science Foundation, SNSF, Switzerland
                Award ID: 310030_197921
                Funded by: National Geographic Explorer Grant
                Award ID: EC-57058R-18
                Funded by: Ecominga Foundation
                This study was supported by the Universidad San Francisco de Quito (HUBI 5467, 5466; 11164, 16871), the Programa Inédita from Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (Project: Respuestas a la crisis de biodiversidad: la descripción de especies como herramienta de conservación), the São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP (Brazil Grant # 2018/09852-3 to Anyelet Valencia-Aguilar), the Swiss National Science Foundation, SNSF, Switzerland (Project 310030_197921 to Eva Ringler), and National Geographic Explorer Grant (EC-57058R-18 to Becca Brunner). Nouns DAO committed a donation to Ecominga Foundation for habitat conservation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Biodiversity
                Conservation Biology
                Molecular Biology
                Taxonomy
                Zoology

                andes,amphibia,conservation,cryptic diversity,mining,ecuador
                andes, amphibia, conservation, cryptic diversity, mining, ecuador

                Comments

                Comment on this article