Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Regional Reduction of Ganglion Cell Complex after Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Idiopathic Macular Hole

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose. To determine whether the reduction of ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness is uniform in the parafoveal region after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for idiopathic macular hole (MH). Methods. Thirty-nine consecutive eyes were studied. Vitrectomy was performed with ILM peeling with brilliant blue G (BBG) staining, and room air was used for an intraocular tamponade. The GCC thickness and retinal sensitivity were measured at the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal quadrants around the fovea using spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and microperimetry (MP-1). The measurements were made at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Results. In 38 of the 39 eyes, the MH was closed after the initial surgery. At three and six months, the percentage of eyes with significantly thinner GCC areas was higher at the temporal quadrant (40.5% at 3 months and 46.0% at 6 months) than that at the other quadrants ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001, resp.). The retinal sensitivity was also significantly lower in the temporal area than in the other areas (15.7 dB at 3 months, P = 0.003; 15.4 dB at 6 months, P = 0.006). Conclusion. These findings indicate that the inner retina in the temporal area may be more vulnerable to surgical manipulations than the other areas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of age, sex, and axial length on the three-dimensional profile of normal macular layer structures.

          To identify sex-related differences and age-related changes in individual retinal layer thicknesses in a population of healthy eyes across the lifespan, using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). In seven institutes in Japan, mean thicknesses of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), photoreceptor inner segment (IS), and photoreceptor outer segment (OS) were measured using SD-OCT with a new automated segmentation protocol in 256 healthy subjects. Interoperator coefficients of variability for measurements of each layer ranged from 0.012 to 0.038. The RNFL, GCL, IPL, and INL were thinnest in the foveal area, whereas the OPL+ONL and OS were thickest in this area. Mean thicknesses of the INL and the OPL+ONL were significantly greater in men (P = 0.002 and 0.001, respectively). However, mean RNFL thickness was greater in women (P = 0.006). Thicknesses of the RNFL, GCL, IPL, INL, and IS correlated negatively with age. Thickness of the OPL+ONL was not correlated with age, and thickness of the OS correlated positively with age. Inner retinal (RNFL+GCL+IPL) thickness over the whole macula correlated negatively with age (P < 0.001), but outer retinal (OPL+ONL+IS+OS) thickness did not. Thicknesses of layers did not correlate with axial length. Macular layer thicknesses measured on SD-OCT images in healthy eyes showed significant variations by sex and age. These findings should inform macular layer thickness analyses in SD-OCT studies of retinal diseases and glaucoma.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

            To determine whether internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is effective and cost effective compared with no peeling in patients with idiopathic stage 2 or 3 full-thickness maculay hole (FTMH). This was a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants from nine centers were randomized to ILM peeling or no peeling (1:1 ratio) in addition to phacovitrectomy, including detachment and removal of the posterior hyaloid and gas tamponade. The primary outcome was distance visual acuity (VA) at 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included hole closure, distance VA at other time points, near VA, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, reoperations, complications, resource use, and participant-reported health status, visual function, and costs. Of 141 participants randomized in nine centers, 127 (90%) completed the 6-month follow-up. Nonstatistically significant differences in distance visual acuity at 6 months were found between groups (mean difference, 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.3 to 9.8; P = 0.063). There was a significantly higher rate of hole closure in the ILM-peel group (56 [84%] vs. 31 [48%]) at 1 month (odds ratio [OR], 6.23; 95% CI, 2.64-14.73; P < 0.001) with fewer reoperations (8 [12%] vs. 31 [48%]) performed by 6 months (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05-0.34; P < 0.001). Peeling the ILM is likely to be cost effective. There was no evidence of a difference in distance VA after the ILM peeling and no-ILM peeling techniques. An important benefit in favor of no ILM peeling was ruled out. Given the higher anatomic closure and lower reoperation rates in the ILM-peel group, ILM peeling seems to be the treatment of choice for idiopathic stage 2 to 3 FTMH. (Clinical Trials.gov number, NCT00286507.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal.

              To report the appearance of the fundus, that is seen frequently after removal of an idiopathic epiretinal membrane and which we refer to as the dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance. Interventional, noncomparative retrospective case series. One hundred consecutive patients with an epiretinal membrane who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peeling in one eye. Only patients with an idiopathic epiretinal membrane or a membrane associated with a peripheral retinal tear, but without retinal detachment, were considered for this study. Sixty-one patients met these criteria for one eye. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity and preoperative and postoperative blue filter fundus photographs were reviewed. Histopathologic specimens of epiretinal membranes were available for 14 eyes. The postoperative incidence of the dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance on blue filter photographs, visual acuity changes, and the presence of internal limiting membrane in epiretinal membrane specimens. The postoperative incidence of this feature on blue filter fundus photographs was 43%. No difference was found between eyes with or without this feature concerning the average preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity or the average change in visual acuity. Internal limiting membrane was present in all 14 epiretinal membrane specimens available. Five of these 14 patients concerned exhibited a dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance and 9 did not. The dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance occurred frequently after removal of an epiretinal membrane. As far as we know, this feature has not been previously reported. It consisted of numerous arcuate striae within the posterior pole in the direction of the optic nerve fibers and slightly darker than the surrounding retina. This feature had no functional effect noticeable by the patient and did not preclude good visual recovery. The small number of histologic samples and the impossibility of quantifying the area of internal limiting membrane peeled off did not allow us to supply proof that this feature is due to the extensive peeling of the internal limiting membrane, although this is the most likely hypothesis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Ophthalmol
                J Ophthalmol
                JOPH
                Journal of Ophthalmology
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                2090-004X
                2090-0058
                2014
                16 November 2014
                : 2014
                : 372589
                Affiliations
                Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-0856, Japan
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Timothy Y. Lai

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-8391
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-0707
                Article
                10.1155/2014/372589
                4247913
                25478206
                58ca71ac-911f-4f87-9e8d-25170a3b612a
                Copyright © 2014 Takayuki Baba et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 July 2014
                : 29 October 2014
                : 29 October 2014
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                Ophthalmology & Optometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content494

                Cited by12

                Most referenced authors147