32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Influence of perceived stress and workload on work engagement in front‐line nurses during COVID‐19 pandemic

      research-article
      , MSC, RN 1 , , MSC, RN 1 , , , MSC, RN 1 , , BS, RN 1 , , MSC, RN 1 , , MSC, RN 1
      Journal of Clinical Nursing
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      coronavirus disease 2019, influencing factors, nurses, work engagement

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Aims and objectives

          To clarify both the potential influencing factors and the current status of front‐line nurses’ work engagement, and thus provide a reference for targeted interventions.

          Background

          After coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, front‐line nurses embraced remarkable potential stress and huge workload when caring for coronavirus disease 2019 patients, which may lead to new challenges to work engagement.

          Design

          A large sample survey was conducted at the end of February 2020 in a designated hospital treating coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei Province, in China. t Test, one‐way ANOVA, chi‐squared test, Pearson's correlation and hierarchical multiple regression were performed among 1,040 nurses using SPSS 24.0. The STROBE checklist was followed for observational studies.

          Results

          The final model interpreted 27.3% of the variance, of which each block could explain 11.7%, 10.3% and 7.9% R 2 changes including sociodemographic characteristics, stress and workload, respectively. Work engagement was negatively correlated with stress and workload. The potential influencing factors included sociodemographic characteristics (married, rescue staff, cabin ward), stress (infection control, PPE discomfort) and workload (mental demand, performance, frustration).

          Conclusions

          Front‐line nurses perceived low stress and workload, but high work engagement, especially in self‐dedication. However, infection control, PPE discomfort and frustration were negatively associated with nurses’ work engagement, while mental demand and good performance were positively associated with nurses’ work engagement. Future interventions focused on decreasing front‐line staff's infection risk and enhancing their self‐confidence may be recommendable to promote their work engagement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China

          Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period

            It is urgent to understand the future of severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. We used estimates of seasonality, immunity, and cross-immunity for betacoronaviruses OC43 and HKU1 from time series data from the USA to inform a model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We projected that recurrent wintertime outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 will probably occur after the initial, most severe pandemic wave. Absent other interventions, a key metric for the success of social distancing is whether critical care capacities are exceeded. To avoid this, prolonged or intermittent social distancing may be necessary into 2022. Additional interventions, including expanded critical care capacity and an effective therapeutic, would improve the success of intermittent distancing and hasten the acquisition of herd immunity. Longitudinal serological studies are urgently needed to determine the extent and duration of immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Even in the event of apparent elimination, SARS-CoV-2 surveillance should be maintained since a resurgence in contagion could be possible as late as 2024.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A theory of human motivation.

              A. MASLOW (1943)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                zpwl999@126.com
                Journal
                J Clin Nurs
                J Clin Nurs
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702
                JOCN
                Journal of Clinical Nursing
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0962-1067
                1365-2702
                27 February 2021
                : 10.1111/jocn.15707
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Nursing Department Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan P.R. China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Ping Zhang, Nursing Department, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1095 Jie Fang Avenue, Hankou, Wuhan 430030, P.R. China.

                Email: zpwl999@ 123456126.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3721-9666
                Article
                JOCN15707
                10.1111/jocn.15707
                8014711
                33590524
                58b10f3d-26bc-421e-9f1f-b1ea6d4e7d49
                © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 17 December 2020
                : 15 May 2020
                : 04 February 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 12, Words: 16411
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.1 mode:remove_FC converted:01.04.2021

                Nursing
                coronavirus disease 2019,influencing factors,nurses,work engagement
                Nursing
                coronavirus disease 2019, influencing factors, nurses, work engagement

                Comments

                Comment on this article