7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular classification based on four molecular subclasses identified in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has gained relevance in recent years due to its prognostic utility and potential to predict benefit from adjuvant treatment. While most ECs can be classified based on a single classifier ( POLE exonuclease domain mutations –  POLEmut, MMR deficiency – MMRd, p53 abnormal – p53abn), a small but clinically relevant group of tumours harbour more than one molecular classifying feature and are referred to as ‘multiple‐classifier’ ECs. We aimed to describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of multiple‐classifier ECs with abnormal p53 (p53abn). Within a cohort of 3518 molecularly profiled ECs, 107 (3%) tumours displayed p53abn in addition to another classifier(s), including 64 with MMRd (MMRd–p53abn), 31 with POLEmut ( POLEmut–p53abn), and 12 with all three aberrations (MMRd– POLEmut–p53abn). MMRd–p53abn ECs and POLEmut–p53abn ECs were mostly grade 3 endometrioid ECs, early stage, and frequently showed morphological features characteristic of MMRd or POLEmut ECs. 18/28 (60%) MMRd–p53abn ECs and 7/15 (46.7%) POLEmut–p53abn ECs showed subclonal p53 overexpression, suggesting that TP53 mutation was a secondary event acquired during tumour progression. Hierarchical clustering of TCGA ECs by single nucleotide variant (SNV) type and somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) revealed that MMRd–p53abn tumours mostly clustered with single‐classifier MMRd tumours (20/23) rather than single‐classifier p53abn tumours (3/23), while POLEmut–p53abn tumours mostly clustered with single‐classifier POLEmut tumours (12/13) and seldom with single‐classifier p53abn tumours (1/13) (both p ≤ 0.001, chi‐squared test). Finally, the clinical outcome of patients with MMRd–p53abn and POLEmut–p53abn ECs [stage I 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) of 92.2% and 94.1%, respectively] was significantly different from single‐classifier p53abn EC (stage I RFS 70.8%, p = 0.024 and p = 0.050, respectively). Our results support the classification of MMRd–p53abn EC as MMRd and POLEmut–p53abn EC as POLEmut. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Mutant p53 in Cancer: New Functions and Therapeutic Opportunities

          Many different types of cancer show a high incidence of TP53 mutations, leading to the expression of mutant p53 proteins. There is growing evidence that these mutant p53s have both lost wild-type p53 tumor suppressor activity and gained functions that help to contribute to malignant progression. Understanding the functions of mutant p53 will help in the development of new therapeutic approaches that may be useful in a broad range of cancer types.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database.

            The tumor suppressor gene TP53 is frequently mutated in human cancers. More than 75% of all mutations are missense substitutions that have been extensively analyzed in various yeast and human cell assays. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) TP53 database (www-p53.iarc.fr) compiles all genetic variations that have been reported in TP53. Here, we present recent database developments that include new annotations on the functional properties of mutant proteins, and we perform a systematic analysis of the database to determine the functional properties that contribute to the occurrence of mutational "hotspots" in different cancer types and to the phenotype of tumors. This analysis showed that loss of transactivation capacity is a key factor for the selection of missense mutations, and that difference in mutation frequencies is closely related to nucleotide substitution rates along TP53 coding sequence. An interesting new finding is that in patients with an inherited missense mutation, the age at onset of tumors was related to the functional severity of the mutation, mutations with total loss of transactivation activity being associated with earlier cancer onset compared to mutations that retain partial transactivation capacity. Furthermore, 80% of the most common mutants show a capacity to exert dominant-negative effect (DNE) over wild-type p53, compared to only 45% of the less frequent mutants studied, suggesting that DNE may play a role in shaping mutation patterns. These results provide new insights into the factors that shape mutation patterns and influence mutation phenotype, which may have clinical interest.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability.

              Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome, is a common autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by early age at onset, neoplastic lesions, and microsatellite instability (MSI). Because cancers with MSI account for approximately 15% of all colorectal cancers and because of the need for a better understanding of the clinical and histologic manifestations of HNPCC, the National Cancer Institute hosted an international workshop on HNPCC in 1996, which led to the development of the Bethesda Guidelines for the identification of individuals with HNPCC who should be tested for MSI. To consider revision and improvement of the Bethesda Guidelines, another HNPCC workshop was held at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, MD, in 2002. In this commentary, we summarize the Workshop presentations on HNPCC and MSI testing; present the issues relating to the performance, sensitivity, and specificity of the Bethesda Guidelines; outline the revised Bethesda Guidelines for identifying individuals at risk for HNPCC; and recommend criteria for MSI testing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                t.bosse@lumc.nl
                Journal
                J Pathol
                J. Pathol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9896
                PATH
                The Journal of Pathology
                John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (Chichester, UK )
                0022-3417
                1096-9896
                12 January 2020
                March 2020
                : 250
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/path.v250.3 )
                : 312-322
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Pathology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics University of Oxford Oxford UK
                [ 3 ] National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford UK
                [ 4 ] Department of Medical and Radiation Oncology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
                [ 5 ] Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency Vancouver Canada
                [ 6 ] Contextual Genomics Inc Vancouver Canada
                [ 7 ] Department of Women's Health Tübingen University Hospital Tübingen Germany
                [ 8 ] Department of Oncology–Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Pathology and Cytology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
                [ 9 ] Department of Clinical Science and Education Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Södersjukhuset Stockholm Sweden
                [ 10 ] Institute of Pathology University of Bern Bern Switzerland
                [ 11 ] Department of Pathology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
                [ 12 ] Department of Pathology Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
                [ 13 ] Department of Pathology, Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova and Hospital U de Bellvitge Universities of Lleida and Barcelona, IDIBELL, IRBLLEIDA, CIBERONC Lleida Spain
                [ 14 ] Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard University Boston MA USA
                [ 15 ] Department of Pathology Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston MA USA
                [ 16 ] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital Vancouver Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence to: T Bosse, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands. E‐mail: t.bosse@ 123456lumc.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0873-5362
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6553-2855
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4617-962X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-8437
                Article
                PATH5373
                10.1002/path.5373
                7065184
                31829447
                58410cd1-f9e9-40df-81d7-ebffd9704e22
                © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 July 2019
                : 25 October 2019
                : 02 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 11, Words: 5674
                Funding
                Funded by: KWF Kankerbestrijding , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100004622;
                Award ID: KWF‐YIG 8232‐31648
                Funded by: NIH/NCI Cancer Center , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: P30 CA008748
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Papers
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.7 mode:remove_FC converted:11.03.2020

                Pathology
                pole,molecular classification,endometrial cancer
                Pathology
                pole, molecular classification, endometrial cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article