0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Is glucocorticoid use associated with a higher clinical pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer? A meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          It has been reported that the use of glucocorticoids may be able to improve clinical pregnancy rates in patients receiving in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between glucocorticoid use and clinical pregnancy rate in IVF-ET patients.

          Methods

          This study has been registered on the International Register of Prospective Systems Evaluation (PROSPERO) (ID: CRD42022375427). A thorough and detailed search of databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify eligible studies up to October 2022. Quality assessment was conducted on the modified Jadad Scoring Scale and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the inter-study heterogeneity was estimated by Q test and I 2 test. Combined hazard ratios with 95% CI were calculated using random effects or fixed effects models based on heterogeneity. Meanwhile, Begg's and Egger's tests were used to detect the existence of publication bias, the leave-one-out method was used for sensitivity analysis and multiple subgroup analyses were conducted.

          Results

          Seventeen studies involving 3056 IVF-ET cycles were included. We found that glucocorticoid use was associated with a higher IVF-ET pregnancy rate (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.27–2.74, P = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis, studies of different regions and different study types all showed similar results that glucocorticoid is beneficial to improve the clinical pregnancy rate of patients with IVF-ET, and patients with positive autoantibodies and patients receiving IVF-ET multiple times also showed the same results. However, there was no significant change in clinical pregnancy rates in the seven studies with negative autoantibodies and in the seven studies with initial IVF-ET treatment. The results of the 12 medium-acting glucocorticoids and 4 long-acting glucocorticoids were also generally consistent with each other. There was no statistical difference in subgroup analysis of whether patients had endometriosis or not.

          Conclusion

          Appropriate use of glucocorticoids is beneficial for improving the clinical pregnancy rate in women receiving IVF-ET, but this result still needs to be verified by more high-quality and large sample size randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

          Graphical abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                04 May 2023
                May 2023
                04 May 2023
                : 9
                : 5
                : e15833
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Clinical Medicine, School of the First Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
                [b ]Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
                [c ]Department of Clinical Medicine, School of the Chaohu Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
                [d ]Sun Yat-sen University, No.74 Nonglin Road, Guangzhou, 510030, Guangdong, China
                [e ]Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, China
                [f ]Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, Anhui Medical University, No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China
                [g ]NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract (Anhui Medical University), No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218 Jixi Road, Hefei230022, Anhui, China joan2004207@ 123456163.com
                [1]

                Yaxuan Lv, Yue Chen, and Lei Hu contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors.

                Article
                S2405-8440(23)03040-2 e15833
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15833
                10196514
                581ba8d0-e6e6-44f7-be47-4c76d9982bb3
                © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 20 January 2023
                : 12 April 2023
                : 25 April 2023
                Categories
                Research Article

                ivf-et,meta-analysis,glucocorticoid,clinical pregnancy rate,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article