18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fear of COVID‐19 Scale (FCV‐19S) across countries: Measurement invariance issues

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          The threats of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) have caused fears worldwide. The Fear of COVID‐19 Scale (FCV‐19S) was recently developed to assess the fear of COVID‐19. Although many studies found that the FCV‐19S is psychometrically sound, it is unclear whether the FCV‐19S is invariant across countries. The present study aimed to examine the measurement invariance of the FCV‐19S across eleven countries.

          Design

          Cross‐sectional study.

          Methods

          Using data collected from prior research on Bangladesh ( N = 8,550), United Kingdom ( N = 344), Brazil ( N = 1,843), Taiwan ( N = 539), Italy ( N = 249), New Zealand ( N = 317), Iran ( N = 717), Cuba ( N = 772), Pakistan ( N = 937), Japan ( N = 1,079) and France ( N = 316), comprising a total 15,663 participants, the present study used the multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch differential item functioning (DIF) to examine the measurement invariance of the FCV‐19S across country, gender and age (children aged below 18 years, young to middle‐aged adults aged between 18 and 60 years, and older people aged above 60 years).

          Results

          The unidimensional structure of the FCV‐19S was confirmed. Multigroup CFA showed that FCV‐19S was partially invariant across country and fully invariant across gender and age. DIF findings were consistent with the findings from multigroup CFA. Many DIF items were displayed for country, few DIF items were displayed for age, and no DIF items were displayed for gender.

          Conclusion

          Based on the results of the present study, the FCV‐19S is a good psychometric instrument to assess fear of COVID‐19 during the pandemic period. Moreover, the use of FCV‐19S is supported in at least ten countries with satisfactory psychometric properties.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science

          Summary The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a profound effect on all aspects of society, including mental health and physical health. We explore the psychological, social, and neuroscientific effects of COVID-19 and set out the immediate priorities and longer-term strategies for mental health science research. These priorities were informed by surveys of the public and an expert panel convened by the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and the mental health research charity, MQ: Transforming Mental Health, in the first weeks of the pandemic in the UK in March, 2020. We urge UK research funding agencies to work with researchers, people with lived experience, and others to establish a high level coordination group to ensure that these research priorities are addressed, and to allow new ones to be identified over time. The need to maintain high-quality research standards is imperative. International collaboration and a global perspective will be beneficial. An immediate priority is collecting high-quality data on the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic across the whole population and vulnerable groups, and on brain function, cognition, and mental health of patients with COVID-19. There is an urgent need for research to address how mental health consequences for vulnerable groups can be mitigated under pandemic conditions, and on the impact of repeated media consumption and health messaging around COVID-19. Discovery, evaluation, and refinement of mechanistically driven interventions to address the psychological, social, and neuroscientific aspects of the pandemic are required. Rising to this challenge will require integration across disciplines and sectors, and should be done together with people with lived experience. New funding will be required to meet these priorities, and it can be efficiently leveraged by the UK's world-leading infrastructure. This Position Paper provides a strategy that may be both adapted for, and integrated with, research efforts in other countries.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation

            Background The emergence of the COVID-19 and its consequences has led to fears, worries, and anxiety among individuals worldwide. The present study developed the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) to complement the clinical efforts in preventing the spread and treating of COVID-19 cases. Methods The sample comprised 717 Iranian participants. The items of the FCV-19S were constructed based on extensive review of existing scales on fears, expert evaluations, and participant interviews. Several psychometric tests were conducted to ascertain its reliability and validity properties. Results After panel review and corrected item-total correlation testing, seven items with acceptable corrected item-total correlation (0.47 to 0.56) were retained and further confirmed by significant and strong factor loadings (0.66 to 0.74). Also, other properties evaluated using both classical test theory and Rasch model were satisfactory on the seven-item scale. More specifically, reliability values such as internal consistency (α = .82) and test–retest reliability (ICC = .72) were acceptable. Concurrent validity was supported by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (with depression, r = 0.425 and anxiety, r = 0.511) and the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease Scale (with perceived infectability, r = 0.483 and germ aversion, r = 0.459). Conclusion The Fear of COVID-19 Scale, a seven-item scale, has robust psychometric properties. It is reliable and valid in assessing fear of COVID-19 among the general population and will also be useful in allaying COVID-19 fears among individuals.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1

              A protection motivation theory is proposed that postulates the three crucial components of a fear appeal to be (a) the magnitude of noxiousness of a depicted event; (b) the probability of that event's occurrence; and (c) the efficacy of a protective response. Each of these communication variables initiates corresponding cognitive appraisal processes that mediate attitude change. The proposed conceptualization is a special case of a more comprehensive theoretical schema: expectancy-value theories. Several suggestions are offered for reinterpreting existing data, designing new types of empirical research, and making future studies more comparable. Finally, the principal advantages of protection motivation theory over the rival formulations of Janis and Leventhal are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ak.masuyama@gmail.com
                Pakpour_Amir@yahoo.com
                Journal
                Nurs Open
                Nurs Open
                10.1002/(ISSN)2054-1058
                NOP2
                Nursing Open
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2054-1058
                21 March 2021
                July 2021
                : 8
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1002/nop2.v8.4 )
                : 1892-1908
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Allied Health Sciences College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Hospital National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan
                [ 2 ] College of Nursing Kaohsiung Medical University Kaohsiung Taiwan
                [ 3 ] Department of Medical Research Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan
                [ 4 ] CHINTA Research Bangladesh (Centre for Health Innovation, Networking, Training, Action and Research ‐ Bangladesh) Savar, Dhaka Bangladesh
                [ 5 ] Unit of Psychobiology University of São Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil
                [ 6 ] Psychology Department Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas Km 5 ½ Santa Clara Cuba
                [ 7 ] Kabir Medical College Gandhara University Peshawar Pakistan
                [ 8 ] Faculty of Psychology Iryo Sosei University Iwaki City Japan
                [ 9 ] Graduate School of Education Tohoku University Sendai‐city Japan
                [ 10 ] ISAE‐SUPAERO (Institut Supérieur de l'aéronautique et de l'espace) University of Toulouse Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi‐Pyrénées) Toulouse France
                [ 11 ] LIP/PC2S University of Savoie Mont Blanc University of Grenoble Alpes Chambéry France
                [ 12 ] Department of Orthopedic Surgery Wan Fang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
                [ 13 ] Department of Orthopedic Surgery School of Medicine College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
                [ 14 ] Jianan Psychiatric Center Ministry of Health and Welfare Tainan Taiwan
                [ 15 ] Department of Natural Biotechnology NanHua University Chiayi Taiwan
                [ 16 ] Group Cognitive Behavioral Psychology Association Rome Italy
                [ 17 ] Department of Psychology University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand
                [ 18 ] Department of Nursing School of Health and Welfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden
                [ 19 ] Department of Clinical Neurophysiology University Hospital Linköping Linköping Sweden
                [ 20 ] International Gaming Research Unit Psychology Department Nottingham Trent University Nottingham UK
                [ 21 ] Social Determinants of Health Research Center Research Institute for Prevention of Non‐Communicable Diseases Qazvin University of Medical Sciences Qazvin Iran
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Amir H. Pakpour, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non‐Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Bahounar BLV, Qazvin 3419759811, Iran and Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.

                Email: Pakpour_Amir@ 123456yahoo.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-4242
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-8966
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1100-101X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-8129
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8798-5345
                Article
                NOP2855
                10.1002/nop2.855
                8186712
                33745219
                57ea94f2-0eb0-4712-8c26-d38929d39202
                © 2021 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 January 2021
                : 26 November 2020
                : 17 February 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 7, Pages: 1856, Words: 13348
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:08.06.2021

                assessment,covid‐19,cross‐cultural,differential item functioning,fcv‐19s,fear of covid‐19,rasch analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article