1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effects of obstetric emergency team training on patient outcome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Little is known about the optimal simulation‐based team training in obstetric emergencies. We aimed to review how simulation‐based team training affects patient outcomes in obstetric emergencies.

          Material and methods

          Search Strategy: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to and including May 15, 2021. Selection criteria: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on obstetric teams in high‐resource settings comparing the effect of simulation‐based obstetric emergency team training with no training on the risk of Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 min, neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, severe postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion of four or more units, and delay of emergency cesarean section by more than 30 min. Data collection and analysis: The included studies were assessed using PRISMA, EPCO, and GRADE.

          Results

          We found 21 studies, four RCTs and 17 cohort studies, evaluating patient outcomes after obstetric team training compared with no training. Annual obstetric emergency team training may reduce brachial plexus injury (six cohort studies: odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.33–0.68; one RCT: OR 1.30, 95 CI% 0.39–4.33, low certainty evidence) and suggest a positive effect; but it was not significant on Apgar score below 7 at 5 min (three cohort studies: OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.51–1.19; two RCT: OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72–1.05, moderate certainty evidence). The effect was unclear for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, umbilical prolapse, decision to birth interval in emergency cesarean section, and for severe postpartum hemorrhage. Studies with in situ multi‐professional simulation‐based training demonstrated the best effect.

          Conclusions

          Emerging evidence suggests an effect of obstetric team training on obstetric outcomes, but conflicting results call for controlled trials targeted to identify the optimal methodology for effective team training.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis.

          Data for the causes of maternal deaths are needed to inform policies to improve maternal health. We developed and analysed global, regional, and subregional estimates of the causes of maternal death during 2003-09, with a novel method, updating the previous WHO systematic review. We searched specialised and general bibliographic databases for articles published between between Jan 1, 2003, and Dec 31, 2012, for research data, with no language restrictions, and the WHO mortality database for vital registration data. On the basis of prespecified inclusion criteria, we analysed causes of maternal death from datasets. We aggregated country level estimates to report estimates of causes of death by Millennium Development Goal regions and worldwide, for main and subcauses of death categories with a Bayesian hierarchical model. We identified 23 eligible studies (published 2003-12). We included 417 datasets from 115 countries comprising 60 799 deaths in the analysis. About 73% (1 771 000 of 2 443 000) of all maternal deaths between 2003 and 2009 were due to direct obstetric causes and deaths due to indirect causes accounted for 27·5% (672 000, 95% UI 19·7-37·5) of all deaths. Haemorrhage accounted for 27·1% (661 000, 19·9-36·2), hypertensive disorders 14·0% (343 000, 11·1-17·4), and sepsis 10·7% (261 000, 5·9-18·6) of maternal deaths. The rest of deaths were due to abortion (7·9% [193 000], 4·7-13·2), embolism (3·2% [78 000], 1·8-5·5), and all other direct causes of death (9·6% [235 000], 6·5-14·3). Regional estimates varied substantially. Between 2003 and 2009, haemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, and sepsis were responsible for more than half of maternal deaths worldwide. More than a quarter of deaths were attributable to indirect causes. These analyses should inform the prioritisation of health policies, programmes, and funding to reduce maternal deaths at regional and global levels. Further efforts are needed to improve the availability and quality of data related to maternal mortality. © 2014 World Health Organization; licensee Elsevier. This is an Open Access article published without any waiver of WHO's privileges and immunities under international law, convention, or agreement. This article should not be reproduced for use in association with the promotion of commercial products, services, or any legal entity. There should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review.

            The reduction of maternal deaths is a key international development goal. Evidence-based health policies and programmes aiming to reduce maternal deaths need reliable and valid information. We undertook a systematic review to determine the distribution of causes of maternal deaths. We selected datasets using prespecified criteria, and recorded dataset characteristics, methodological features, and causes of maternal deaths. All analyses were restricted to datasets representative of populations. We analysed joint causes of maternal deaths from datasets reporting at least four major causes (haemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, sepsis, abortion, obstructed labour, ectopic pregnancy, embolism). We examined datasets reporting individual causes of death to investigate the heterogeneity due to methodological features and geographical region and the contribution of haemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, abortion, and sepsis as causes of maternal death at the country level. 34 datasets (35,197 maternal deaths) were included in the primary analysis. We recorded wide regional variation in the causes of maternal deaths. Haemorrhage was the leading cause of death in Africa (point estimate 33.9%, range 13.3-43.6; eight datasets, 4508 deaths) and in Asia (30.8%, 5.9-48.5; 11,16 089). In Latin America and the Caribbean, hypertensive disorders were responsible for the most deaths (25.7%, 7.9-52.4; ten, 11,777). Abortion deaths were the highest in Latin America and the Caribbean (12%), which can be as high as 30% of all deaths in some countries in this region. Deaths due to sepsis were higher in Africa (odds ratio 2.71), Asia (1.91), and Latin America and the Caribbean (2.06) than in developed countries. Haemorrhage and hypertensive disorders are major contributors to maternal deaths in developing countries. These data should inform evidence-based reproductive health-care policies and programmes at regional and national levels. Capacity-strengthening efforts to improve the quality of burden-of-disease studies will further validate future estimates.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education.

              The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education (NOS-E) were developed to appraise methodological quality in medical education research. The study objective was to evaluate the interrater reliability, normative scores, and between-instrument correlation for these two instruments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lbrj@clin.au.dk
                Journal
                Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
                Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
                10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0412
                AOGS
                Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0001-6349
                1600-0412
                08 October 2021
                January 2022
                : 101
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/aogs.v101.1 )
                : 25-36
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
                [ 2 ] Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
                [ 3 ] Research Center for Emergency Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
                [ 4 ] Department of Critical Care Medicine Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia PA USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Medicine Randers Regional Hospital Randers Denmark
                [ 6 ] Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
                [ 7 ] Department of Human Resources Medical simulation in Central Denmark Region (MidtSim) Aarhus Denmark
                [ 8 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Randers Regional Hospital Randers Denmark
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Lise Brogaard, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul‐Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.

                Email: lbrj@ 123456clin.au.dk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-9682
                Article
                AOGS14263
                10.1111/aogs.14263
                9564821
                34622945
                57bbc007-b0d2-4903-9ba8-bc970d7650f9
                © 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG)

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 19 August 2021
                : 25 May 2021
                : 27 August 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 12, Words: 7382
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.9 mode:remove_FC converted:27.09.2022

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                birth,brachial plexus,delivery,emergency teams,obstetric,postpartum hemorrhage,shoulder dystocia,simulation training,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content216

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors771