13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Role of Animal Cognition in Human-Wildlife Interactions

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Humans have a profound effect on the planet’s ecosystems, and unprecedented rates of human population growth and urbanization have brought wild animals into increasing contact with people. For many species, appropriate responses toward humans are likely to be critical to survival and reproductive success. Although numerous studies have investigated the impacts of human activity on biodiversity and species distributions, relatively few have examined the effects of humans on the behavioral responses of animals during human-wildlife encounters, and the cognitive processes underpinning those responses. Furthermore, while humans often present a significant threat to animals, the presence or behavior of people may be also associated with benefits, such as food rewards. In scenarios where humans vary in their behavior, wild animals would be expected to benefit from the ability to discriminate between dangerous, neutral and rewarding people. Additionally, individual differences in cognitive and behavioral phenotypes and past experiences with humans may affect animals’ ability to exploit human-dominated environments and respond appropriately to human cues. In this review, we examine the cues that wild animals use to modulate their behavioral responses toward humans, such as human facial features and gaze direction. We discuss when wild animals are expected to attend to certain cues, how information is used, and the cognitive mechanisms involved. We consider how the cognitive abilities of wild animals are likely to be under selection by humans and therefore influence population and community composition. We conclude by highlighting the need for long-term studies on free-living, wild animals to fully understand the causes and ecological consequences of variation in responses to human cues. The effects of humans on wildlife behavior are likely to be substantial, and a detailed understanding of these effects is key to implementing effective conservation strategies and managing human-wildlife conflict.

          Related collections

          Most cited references175

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change

            Almost all organisms live in environments that have been altered, to some degree, by human activities. Because behaviour mediates interactions between an individual and its environment, the ability of organisms to behave appropriately under these new conditions is crucial for determining their immediate success or failure in these modified environments. While hundreds of species are suffering dramatically from these environmental changes, others, such as urbanized and pest species, are doing better than ever. Our goal is to provide insights into explaining such variation. We first summarize the responses of some species to novel situations, including novel risks and resources, habitat loss/fragmentation, pollutants and climate change. Using a sensory ecology approach, we present a mechanistic framework for predicting variation in behavioural responses to environmental change, drawing from models of decision-making processes and an understanding of the selective background against which they evolved. Where immediate behavioural responses are inadequate, learning or evolutionary adaptation may prove useful, although these mechanisms are also constrained by evolutionary history. Although predicting the responses of species to environmental change is difficult, we highlight the need for a better understanding of the role of evolutionary history in shaping individuals’ responses to their environment and provide suggestion for future work.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing the causes of late Pleistocene extinctions on the continents.

              One of the great debates about extinction is whether humans or climatic change caused the demise of the Pleistocene megafauna. Evidence from paleontology, climatology, archaeology, and ecology now supports the idea that humans contributed to extinction on some continents, but human hunting was not solely responsible for the pattern of extinction everywhere. Instead, evidence suggests that the intersection of human impacts with pronounced climatic change drove the precise timing and geography of extinction in the Northern Hemisphere. The story from the Southern Hemisphere is still unfolding. New evidence from Australia supports the view that humans helped cause extinctions there, but the correlation with climate is weak or contested. Firmer chronologies, more realistic ecological models, and regional paleoecological insights still are needed to understand details of the worldwide extinction pattern and the population dynamics of the species involved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                04 November 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 589978
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter , Cornwall, United Kingdom
                [2] 2 Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC) , Midlothian, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Luigi Baciadonna, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Claudia A. F. Wascher, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom; Anindita Bhadra, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, India

                *Correspondence: Madeleine Goumas, m.goumas@ 123456exeter.ac.uk

                These authors share first authorship

                These authors have contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship

                This article was submitted to Comparative Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589978
                7672032
                33250826
                57af88b0-5bf4-474d-9d46-d5a3d60abdd9
                Copyright © 2020 Goumas, Lee, Boogert, Kelley and Thornton.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 July 2020
                : 12 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 178, Pages: 18, Words: 16723
                Funding
                Funded by: Natural Environment Research Council 10.13039/501100000270
                Award ID: NE/L002434/1
                Funded by: BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship
                Award ID: B/H021817/2
                Funded by: Human Frontier Science Program grant
                Award ID: RG0049/2017
                Funded by: Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellowships
                Award ID: DH140080
                Award ID: DH160082
                Funded by: Royal Society Enhancement Award
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                animal cognition,human-wildlife interactions,gaze sensitivity,individual recognition,class-level recognition,categorization,generalization,behavioral flexibility

                Comments

                Comment on this article