0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Consumer insights into the at‐home liking of commercial beers: Integrating nonvolatile and volatile flavor chemometrics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Consumer acceptability of beers is influenced by product formulation and processing conditions, which impart unique sensory profiles. This study used multivariate techniques to evaluate at‐home consumer sensory acceptability of six commercial beers considering their style, fermentation type, and chemical composition. Samples included top‐fermented beers (American India Pale Ale and Stout) and bottom‐fermented beers (Pilsner, zero‐alcohol Pilsner, Vienna Lager, and Munich Dunkel). Beer consumers ( n = 50) conducted sensory hedonic, check‐all‐that‐apply (CATA) and just‐about‐right (JAR) tests. Chemometric variables included iso‐alpha‐acids, hordenine, and volatile aromatic compounds, quantified by chromatographic methods, whereas bitterness units (IBU) were determined spectrophotometrically. Lager beers had higher acceptability than top‐fermented beer ( p < .05) for all attributes. Light‐colored beers and medium‐height foams had the highest liking scores for visual sensory attributes. Higher concentrations of bitter‐tasting molecules, hordenine, and acidity decreased the liking scores of top‐fermented (Ale) beers, as a sensory penalty analysis suggested. In contrast, the most favored beers (Pilsners and Munich Dunkel) contained higher fusel alcohol esters linked to fruity aromatic notes. Although a low conversion rate of fatty acids into fruity esters was noted in nonalcoholic Pilsner, its overall liking score was not statistically different from the alcoholic version. However, consumers perceived the nonalcoholic Pilsner as less bitter than its alcoholic counterpart even when IBUs were nonsignificantly different. This study emphasized the significance of understanding beer chemometrics to comprehend consumer acceptability, highlighting the crucial role of bitter molecules. Hence, hordenine, acidity, and volatile contents provided additional and valuable insights into consumer preferences.

          Abstract

          Most liked beers (Pilsners and Munich Dunkel) contained higher fusel alcohol esters linked to fruity aromatic notes. Consumers penalized top fermentation beers characterized by higher concentrations of bitter molecules and hordenine. Light‐colored and medium‐height foam were the highest scored sensory visual attributes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Flavour-active volatile compounds in beer: production, regulation and control

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Humulus lupulus- a story that begs to be told. A review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Chemical characterization of aromas in beer and their effect on consumers liking

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                perez.carrillo@tec.mx
                chbrenes@tec.mx
                Journal
                Food Sci Nutr
                Food Sci Nutr
                10.1002/(ISSN)2048-7177
                FSN3
                Food Science & Nutrition
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2048-7177
                07 March 2024
                June 2024
                : 12
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/fsn3.v12.6 )
                : 4063-4075
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Tecnologico de Monterrey Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias Monterrey NL México
                [ 2 ] Digital Agriculture, Food and Wine Research Group, Faculty of Sciences The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
                [ 3 ] SensoLab Solutions Centro de Innovación y Transferencia Tecnológica (CIT2) Monterrey Mexico
                [ 4 ] Tecnologico de Monterrey Institute for Obesity Research Monterrey NL México
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Carmen Hernandez‐Brenes and Esther Pérez‐Carillo, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingenieria y Ciencias, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon 64849, Mexico.

                Email: chbrenes@ 123456tec.mx and perez.carrillo@ 123456tec.mx

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-8035
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5369-2002
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-9307
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5475-2935
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2492-8706
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-5458
                https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4553-5146
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-2075
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-5085
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2636-6281
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-4254
                Article
                FSN34066 FSN3-2023-08-1812.R2
                10.1002/fsn3.4066
                11167190
                5798f929-af7f-4e4c-b240-2ecdd03653cd
                © 2024 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 February 2024
                : 29 August 2023
                : 22 February 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 2, Pages: 13, Words: 8323
                Funding
                Funded by: Consejo de Investigacion sobre Salud y Cerveza de México, A. C. through a competitive grant awarded to Tecnologico de Monterrey in collaboration with the University of Melbourne
                Funded by: Scholarship funding granted by the Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencia y Tecnología (CONAHCyT México)
                Award ID: ICDL 1204407 JACC 1078290
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.4 mode:remove_FC converted:12.06.2024

                acceptability,beer,bitterness,chemometric,fermentation,style
                acceptability, beer, bitterness, chemometric, fermentation, style

                Comments

                Comment on this article