1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      German Farmers' Awareness of Lameness in Their Dairy Herds

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lameness is one of the most challenging problems in the dairy industry. Control is impeded because farmers often underestimate the number of lame cows. The objectives of this study were to assess German farmers' awareness of lameness in their herds and to determine the associations between farmers' awareness and their management practices, farm characteristics as well as with farmers' education, personality traits and attitudes. As a part of a large cross-sectional study, veterinarians visited farms in three structurally different regions of Germany: north ( n = 253), east ( n = 252), and south ( n = 260). The cows ( n = 84,998) were scored for locomotion and farmers were asked to estimate the number of cows that were lame or did not walk soundly. The ratio of farmers' estimated prevalence and the veterinarians' observed prevalence (Farmer's Detection Index; FDI) was calculated. The median lameness prevalence assessed by the veterinarians was 23.1, 39.1, and 23.2%, and the median prevalence of lame cows estimated by the farmers was 9.5, 9.5, and 7.1% in the north, east, and south, respectively. On average, farmers were conscious of only 45.3% (north), 24.0% (east), and 30.0% (south) of their lame cows. Farmers managing their herds according to organic principles had a higher FDI than farmers who managed their herds conventionally. Surprisingly, no significant associations between FDI and factors concerning claw health management could be detected. Therefore, increased awareness did not seem to be necessarily linked to improved management. Moreover, the FDI was not significantly associated with farmers' education or herd size. In the south, more extraverted farmers had a lower FDI. Those farmers who totally agreed with the statement, “I am satisfied with my herd's health,” had a lower FDI than farmers who disagreed or were undecided. Moreover, farmers who disagreed or were undecided with the statement, “It affects me to see a cow in pain” had a higher FDI than those farmers who agreed to the statement. The results indicate that poor awareness of lameness was linked to the farmers' attitude and personality. Therefore, new approaches concerning the consultation regarding lameness control, such as the use of Motivational Interviewing, might be useful in the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                24 March 2022
                2022
                : 9
                : 866791
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [2] 2Clinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine, Foundation , Hannover, Germany
                [3] 3Clinic for Ruminants With Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich , Munich, Germany
                [4] 4Department of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing (IBEI), WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training for Health at the Human-Animal-Environment Interface, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation , Hannover, Germany
                [5] 5Clinic for Ruminants and Swine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Lynette Arnason Hart, University of California, Davis, United States

                Reviewed by: Marcia Endres, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States; Jo Hockenhull, University of Bristol, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Katharina Charlotte Jensen charlotte.jensen@ 123456fu-berlin.de

                This article was submitted to Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2022.866791
                8987770
                35400109
                561f1dc6-580b-438a-9f5e-067d9d24eacf
                Copyright © 2022 Jensen, Oehm, Campe, Stock, Woudstra, Feist, Müller, Hoedemaker and Merle.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 January 2022
                : 28 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 8, Equations: 0, References: 59, Pages: 14, Words: 10645
                Funding
                Funded by: Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, doi 10.13039/501100005908;
                Award ID: 2814HS006
                Award ID: 2814HS007
                Award ID: 2814HS008
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Original Research

                locomotion score,personality trait,farmers' detection index,attitude,claw health,mobility score

                Comments

                Comment on this article