306
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Decellularization Protocols for Preparing a Decellularized Porcine Annulus Fibrosus Scaffold

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tissue-specific extracellular matrix plays an important role in promoting tissue regeneration and repair. We hypothesized that decellularized annular fibrosus matrix may be an appropriate scaffold for annular fibrosus tissue engineering. We aimed to determine the optimal decellularization method suitable for annular fibrosus. Annular fibrosus tissue was treated with 3 different protocols with Triton X-100, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and trypsin. After the decellularization process, we examined cell removal and preservation of the matrix components, microstructure and mechanical function with the treatments to determine which method is more efficient. All 3 protocols achieved decellularization; however, SDS or trypsin disturbed the structure of the annular fibrosus. All protocols maintained collagen content, but glycosaminoglycan content was lost to different degrees, with the highest content with TritonX-100 treatment. Furthermore, SDS decreased the tensile mechanical property of annular fibrosus as compared with the other 2 protocols. MTT assay revealed that the decellularized annular fibrosus was not cytotoxic. Annular fibrosus cells seeded into the scaffold showed good viability. The Triton X-100–treated annular fibrosus retained major extracellular matrix components after thorough cell removal and preserved the concentric lamellar structure and tensile mechanical properties. As well, it possessed favorable biocompatibility, so it may be a suitable candidate as a scaffold for annular fibrosus tissue engineering.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Decellularization of tissues and organs.

          Decellularized tissues and organs have been successfully used in a variety of tissue engineering/regenerative medicine applications, and the decellularization methods used vary as widely as the tissues and organs of interest. The efficiency of cell removal from a tissue is dependent on the origin of the tissue and the specific physical, chemical, and enzymatic methods that are used. Each of these treatments affect the biochemical composition, tissue ultrastructure, and mechanical behavior of the remaining extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold, which in turn, affect the host response to the material. Herein, the most commonly used decellularization methods are described, and consideration give to the effects of these methods upon the biologic scaffold material.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue.

            The dimethylmethylene blue assay for sulphated glycosaminoglycans has found wide acceptance as a quick and simple method of measuring the sulphated glycosaminoglycan content of tissues and fluids. The available assay methods have lacked specificity for sulphated glycosaminoglycans in the presence of other polyanions, however, and have not discriminated between the different sulphated glycosaminoglycans. We now describe a modified form of the dimethylmethylene blue assay that has improved specificity for sulphated glycosaminoglycans, and we show that in conjunction with specific polysaccharidases, the dimethylmethylene blue assay can be used to quantitate individual sulphated glycosaminoglycans.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Low back pain

              Low back pain is a leading cause of disability. It occurs in similar proportions in all cultures, interferes with quality of life and work performance, and is the most common reason for medical consultations. Few cases of back pain are due to specific causes; most cases are non-specific. Acute back pain is the most common presentation and is usually self-limiting, lasting less than three months regardless of treatment. Chronic back pain is a more difficult problem, which often has strong psychological overlay: work dissatisfaction, boredom, and a generous compensation system contribute to it. Among the diagnoses offered for chronic pain is fibromyalgia, an urban condition (the diagnosis is not made in rural settings) that does not differ materially from other instances of widespread chronic pain. Although disc protrusions detected on X-ray are often blamed, they rarely are responsible for the pain, and surgery is seldom successful at alleviating it. No single treatment is superior to others; patients prefer manipulative therapy, but studies have not demonstrated that it has any superiority over others. A WHO Advisory Panel has defined common outcome measures to be used to judge the efficacy of treatments for studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                24 January 2014
                : 9
                : 1
                : e86723
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China
                [2 ]Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
                [3 ]Cell Engineering Laboratory of Orthopaedic Institute, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China
                [4 ]School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China
                [5 ]Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
                National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: HX BX QY. Performed the experiments: HX XL Yang Zhang. Analyzed the data: XM QX CZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YW. Wrote the paper: HX BX QY Yuanyuan Zhang.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-22700
                10.1371/journal.pone.0086723
                3901704
                24475172
                5603fad1-ed70-4a67-8aa7-4f0eaaf947bb
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 1 June 2013
                : 14 December 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Funding
                This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 31000432 and 81272046), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (grant numbers 2011M500530, 2012T50235), and the Research Foundation of the Tianjin Health Bureau (grant number 2010KR08). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Biotechnology
                Bioengineering
                Biomedical Engineering
                Biomimetics
                Biomaterials
                Tissue Engineering
                Engineering
                Bioengineering
                Biomedical Engineering
                Biomimetics
                Materials Science
                Biomaterials
                Material by Structure
                Hierarchical Materials
                Microstructure
                Natural Materials

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article