9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      COVID-19 vaccine rejection causes based on Twitter people’s opinions analysis using deep learning

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          According to the World Health Organization, vaccine hesitancy was one of the ten major threats to global health in 2019, including the COVID-19 vaccine. The availability of vaccines does not always mean utilization. This is because, people have less confidence in vaccines, which resulted in vaccination hesitancy and developing global decline in vaccine intake and has caused viral disease outbreaks worldwide. Therefore, there is a need to understand people’s perceptions about the COVID-19 vaccine to help the manufacturing companies of the vaccine to improve their marketing strategy based on the rejection causes. In this paper, we used multi-class Sentiment Analysis to classify people’s opinions from extracted tweets about COVID-19 vaccines, using firstly different Machine Learning (ML) classifiers such as Logistic Regression (LR), Stochastic Gradient Descent, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree (DT), Multinomial Naïve Bayes, Random Forest and Gradient Boosting and secondly various Deep Learning (DL) models such as Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), RNN-LSTM and RNN-GRU. Then, we investigated the analysis of the negative tweets to identify the causes of rejection using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) technique. Finally, we classified these negative tweets according to the rejection causes for all the vaccines using the same selected ML and DL models. The result of SA showed that DT gives the best performance with an accuracy of 92.26% and for DL models, GRU achieved 96.83%. Then, we identified five causes: Lack of safety, Side effect, Production problem, Fake news and Misinformation, and Cost. Furthermore, for the classification of the negative tweets according to the identified rejection causes, the LR achieved the best result with an accuracy of 89.97%. For DL models, the LSTM model showed the best result with an accuracy of 91.66%.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19

          Vaccine hesitancy remains a barrier to full population inoculation against highly infectious diseases. Coincident with the rapid developments of COVID-19 vaccines globally, concerns about the safety of such a vaccine could contribute to vaccine hesitancy. We analyzed 1941 anonymous questionnaires completed by healthcare workers and members of the general Israeli population, regarding acceptance of a potential COVID-19 vaccine. Our results indicate that healthcare staff involved in the care of COVID-19 positive patients, and individuals considering themselves at risk of disease, were more likely to self-report acquiescence to COVID-19 vaccination if and when available. In contrast, parents, nurses, and medical workers not caring for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients expressed higher levels of vaccine hesitancy. Interventional educational campaigns targeted towards populations at risk of vaccine hesitancy are therefore urgently needed to combat misinformation and avoid low inoculation rates.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom

            Identifying and understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy within distinct populations may aid future public health messaging. Using nationally representative data from the general adult populations of Ireland (N = 1041) and the United Kingdom (UK; N = 2025), we found that vaccine hesitancy/resistance was evident for 35% and 31% of these populations respectively. Vaccine hesitant/resistant respondents in Ireland and the UK differed on a number of sociodemographic and health-related variables but were similar across a broad array of psychological constructs. In both populations, those resistant to a COVID-19 vaccine were less likely to obtain information about the pandemic from traditional and authoritative sources and had similar levels of mistrust in these sources compared to vaccine accepting respondents. Given the geographical proximity and socio-economic similarity of the populations studied, it is not possible to generalize findings to other populations, however, the methodology employed here may be useful to those wishing to understand COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy elsewhere.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Parents’ and guardians’ views on the acceptability of a future COVID-19 vaccine: a multi-methods study in England

              Highlights • Most parents stated they would likely accept a COVID-19 vaccine for themselves and their children. • Ethnicity and household income were predictors of COVID-19 vaccine refusal. • The main motivation for vaccine acceptance was for self-protection against COVID-19. • Foremost concerns were around the safety and efficacy of a ‘rushed’ new vaccine.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Wafa.Faisal.A@hotmail.com
                FayeAlomary@gmail.com
                r.mokni@psau.edu.sa
                Journal
                Soc Netw Anal Min
                Soc Netw Anal Min
                Social Network Analysis and Mining
                Springer Vienna (Vienna )
                1869-5450
                1869-5469
                3 April 2023
                2023
                : 13
                : 1
                : 62
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.449553.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0441 5588, Department of Information System, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, , Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, ; 11942 Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
                [2 ]GRID grid.412124.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2323 5644, University of Sfax, ; Sfax, Tunisia
                Article
                1059
                10.1007/s13278-023-01059-y
                10069356
                55acd4f8-8197-4124-98eb-c8f05cec305b
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 7 August 2022
                : 2 March 2023
                : 4 March 2023
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2023

                covid-19 vaccines,deep learning,gru-lstm,latent dirichlet allocation,sentiment analysis,vaccine rejection causes

                Comments

                Comment on this article