7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current and future pharmacological therapies for managing cirrhosis and its complications

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Due to the restrictions of liver transplantation, complication-guided pharmacological therapy has become the mainstay of long-term management of cirrhosis. This article aims to provide a complete overview of pharmacotherapy options that may be commenced in the outpatient setting which are available for managing cirrhosis and its complications, together with discussion of current controversies and potential future directions. PubMed/Medline/Cochrane Library were electronically searched up to December 2018 to identify studies evaluating safety, efficacy and therapeutic mechanisms of pharmacological agents in cirrhotic adults and animal models of cirrhosis. Non-selective beta-blockers effectively reduce variceal re-bleeding risk in cirrhotic patients with moderate/large varices, but appear ineffective for primary prevention of variceal development and may compromise renal function and haemodynamic stability in advanced decompensation. Recent observational studies suggest protective, haemodynamically-independent effects of beta-blockers relating to reduced bacterial translocation. The gut-selective antibiotic rifaximin is effective for secondary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy; recent small trials also indicate its potential superiority to norfloxacin for secondary prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Diuretics remain the mainstay of uncomplicated ascites treatment, and early trials suggest alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists may improve diuretic response in refractory ascites. Vaptans have not demonstrated clinical effectiveness in treating refractory ascites and may cause detrimental complications. Despite initial hepatotoxicity concerns, safety of statin administration has been demonstrated in compensated cirrhosis. Furthermore, statins are suggested to have protective effects upon fibrosis progression, decompensation and mortality. Evidence as to whether proton pump inhibitors cause gut-liver-brain axis dysfunction is conflicting. Emerging evidence indicates that anticoagulation therapy reduces incidence and increases recanalisation rates of non-malignant portal vein thrombosis, and may impede hepatic fibrogenesis and decompensation. Pharmacotherapy for cirrhosis should be implemented in accordance with up-to-date guidelines and in conjunction with aetiology management, nutritional optimisation and patient education.

          Related collections

          Most cited references120

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fecal microbiota transplant from a rational stool donor improves hepatic encephalopathy: A randomized clinical trial

            Recurrent hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a leading cause of readmission despite standard of care (SOC) associated with microbial dysbiosis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may improve dysbiosis; however, it has not been studied in HE. We aimed to define whether FMT using a rationally-derived stool donor is safe in recurrent HE compared to SOC alone. An open-label, randomized clinical trial with a 5 month follow-up in outpatient cirrhotic men with recurrent HE on SOC was conducted with 1:1 randomization. FMT-randomized patients received 5-days of broad-spectrum antibiotic pre-treatment then a single FMT enema from the same donor with the optimal microbiota deficient in HE. Follow-up occurred on days 5, 6, 12, 35 and 150 post-randomization. The primary outcome was safety of FMT compared to SOC using FMT-related serious adverse events (SAE). Secondary outcomes were AEs, cognition, microbiota and metabolomic changes. Participants in both arms were similar on all baseline criteria and were followed till study-end. FMT with antibiotic pre-treatment was well-tolerated. Eight (80%) SOC participants had a total of 11 SAE compared to two (20%) FMT participants with SAEs (both FMT-unrelated, p=0.02). Five SOC and no FMT participants developed further HE (p=0.03). Cognition improved in FMT, but not SOC group. MELD score transiently worsened post-antibiotics, but reverted to baseline post-FMT. Post-antibiotics, beneficial taxa and microbial diversity reduction occurred with Proteobacteria expansion. However, FMT increased diversity and beneficial taxa. SOC microbiota and MELD score remained similar throughout. Conclusions: FMT from a rationally selected donor reduced hospitalizations, improved cognition and dysbiosis in cirrhosis with recurrent HE.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Enoxaparin prevents portal vein thrombosis and liver decompensation in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

              We performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, in preventing portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with advanced cirrhosis. In a nonblinded, single-center study, 70 outpatients with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh classes B7-C10) with demonstrated patent portal veins and without hepatocellular carcinoma were assigned randomly to groups that were given enoxaparin (4000 IU/day, subcutaneously for 48 weeks; n = 34) or no treatment (controls, n = 36). Ultrasonography (every 3 months) and computed tomography (every 6 months) were performed to check the portal vein axis. The primary outcome was prevention of PVT. Radiologists and hepatologists that assessed outcomes were blinded to group assignments. Analysis was by intention to treat. At 48 weeks, none of the patients in the enoxaparin group had developed PVT, compared with 6 of 36 (16.6%) controls (P = .025). At 96 weeks, no patient developed PVT in the enoxaparin group, compared with 10 of 36 (27.7%) controls (P = .001). At the end of the follow-up period, 8.8% of patients in the enoxaparin group and 27.7% of controls developed PVT (P = .048). The actuarial probability of PVT was lower in the enoxaparin group (P = .006). Liver decompensation was less frequent among patients given enoxaparin (11.7%) than controls (59.4%) (P < .0001); overall values were 38.2% vs 83.0%, respectively (P < .0001). The actuarial probability of liver decompensation was lower in the enoxaparin group (P < .0001). Eight patients in the enoxaparin group and 13 controls died. The actuarial probability of survival was higher in the enoxaparin group (P = .020). No relevant side effects or hemorrhagic events were reported. In a small randomized controlled trial, a 12-month course of enoxaparin was safe and effective in preventing PVT in patients with cirrhosis and a Child-Pugh score of 7-10. Enoxaparin appeared to delay the occurrence of hepatic decompensation and to improve survival. Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Gastroenterol
                World J. Gastroenterol
                WJG
                World Journal of Gastroenterology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1007-9327
                2219-2840
                28 February 2019
                28 February 2019
                : 25
                : 8
                : 888-908
                Affiliations
                Liver Unit/Division of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom
                Liver Unit/Division of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom
                Liver Unit/Division of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom
                Liver Unit/Division of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom
                Liver Unit/Division of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom
                Liver Unit/Division of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom. a.dhar@ 123456imperial.ac.uk
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Kockerling D and Nathwani R performed the literature search and wrote the first draft of the manuscript; Mullish BH, Manousou P, Forlano R and Dhar A provided critical review of the first draft and contributed to amendment of the text; all authors contributed to and approved the final submission.

                Supported by The Division of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease at Imperial College London receives financial support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London . This article is independently funded by the NIHR BRC, and the views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR, or the Department of Health. Mullish BH is the recipient of a Medical Research Council Clinical Research Training Fellowship (grant number: MR/R00875/1). Forlano R is the recipient of the EASL Juan Rodes PhD fellowship.

                Corresponding author: Ameet Dhar, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Hepatologist, Liver Unit/Division of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Imperial College London, 10th Floor, QEQM Wing, St Mary’s Hospital Campus, South Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom. a.dhar@ 123456imperial.ac.uk

                Telephone: +44-20-33126454 Fax: +44-20-77249369

                Article
                jWJG.v25.i8.pg888
                10.3748/wjg.v25.i8.888
                6397723
                30833797
                5565674a-0255-456f-b16c-1a20b32b2a00
                ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 7 December 2018
                : 17 January 2019
                : 26 January 2019
                Categories
                Review

                cirrhosis,beta-blockers,rifaximin,diuretics,statins,proton pump inhibitors,pharmacology

                Comments

                Comment on this article