Matched related transplantation versus immunosuppressive therapy plus eltrombopag for first-line treatment of severe aplastic anemia: a multicenter, prospective study

Abstract

This study prospectively compared the efficacy and safety between matched related donor-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MRD-HSCT) ( n = 108) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) plus eltrombopag (EPAG) (IST + EPAG) ( n = 104) to determine whether MRD-HSCT was still superior as a front-line treatment for patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Compared with IST + EPAG group, patients in the MRD-HSCT achieved faster transfusion independence, absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.0 × 10 ⁹/L ( P < 0.05), as well as high percentage of normal blood routine at 6-month (86.5% vs. 23.7%, P < 0.001). In the MRD-HSCT and IST + EPAG groups, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 84.2 ± 3.5% and 89.7 ± 3.1% ( P = 0.164), whereas 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) was 81.4 ± 4.0% and 59.1 ± 4.9% ( P = 0.002), respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated that the FFS of the MRD-HSCT was superior to that of the IST + EPAG among patients aged < 40 years old (81.0 ± 4.6% vs. 63.7 ± 6.5%, P = 0.033), and among patients with vSAA (86.1 ± 5.9% vs. 54.9 ± 7.9%, P = 0.003), while the 3-year OS of the IST + EPAG was higher than that of the MRD-HSCT among the patient aged ≥ 40 years old (100.0 ± 0.0% vs. 77.8 ± 9.8%, P = 0.036). Multivariate analysis showed that first-line MRD-HSCT treatment was associated favorably with normal blood results at 6-month and FFS ( P < 0.05). These outcomes suggest that MRD-HSCT remains the preferred first-line option for SAA patients aged < 40 years old or with vSAA even in the era of EPAG.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13045-022-01324-1.