4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Temporal and Spatial Variations of Enriched Source Components in Linzizong Volcanic Succession, Tibet, and Implications for the India–Asia Collision

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The temporal and spatial distribution of enriched source components at sites of continent–continent collision provides critical insights into mantle dynamic processes associated with subduction- and collision-related events. However, determining the origin of such enriched components remains a significant challenge. We report a comprehensive dataset of the Linzizong volcanic succession (LVS) from four locations with varying distance across-strike to the Indus–Yarlung suture in southern Tibet, which marks the exposed surface expression of the India–Asia collision zone. The LVS rocks in this study can be divided into two groups: a calc-alkaline Group 1 (69–55 Ma), mainly including basaltic–andesitic varieties, and a shoshonitic Group 2 (52–50 Ma), consisting predominantly of silicic rocks with minor mafic compositions. Group 1 samples are likely derived from the fractional crystallization of primitive basaltic melts as a result of the partial melting of a metasomatized mantle wedge. These samples are decoupled in Nd–Hf isotopic compositions, suggesting an incorporation of subducting sediment-derived melts into the mantle wedge. The influence of sediment-derived melt on the mantle source increases away from the suture zone toward Asia (i.e., from the south to the north) as indicated by the more enriched Sr, Nd, Pb, and Hf isotopic compositions, as well as elevated Th/La and La/Sm ratios. The heavy δ26Mg values, and high Ba/Th and Sr/Th ratios of samples close to the suture coincide with the dehydration of the subducting Neo-Tethyan slab. Group 2 mafic samples have depleted and coupled εNd–εHf isotopic compositions and are characterized by elevated (La/Yb)N and Dy/Yb ratios as well as low Zr/Nb ratios, indicating an origin of enriched garnet-bearing lithospheric mantle with contributions from asthenosphere-derived materials. Group 2 silicic samples are isotopically enriched both near and far away from the suture, which can be attributed to the involvement of ancient lower crust-derived melt from Tethyan Himalaya and central Lhasa subterrane basement, respectively. Our results show that the LVS are the magmatic response to late subduction (Group 1), and to initial India–Asia collision and slab breakoff (Group 2). Negative trends in the whole-rock Nd and zircon Hf isotopic compositions at ~51 Ma should be treated with caution for geodynamic interpretations, depending on the distance between the samples and the India–Asia suture.

          Related collections

          Most cited references130

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            THREE NATURAL ZIRCON STANDARDS FOR U-TH-PB, LU-HF, TRACE ELEMENT AND REE ANALYSES

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Volcanic rock series in island arcs and active continental margins

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Petrology
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0022-3530
                1460-2415
                February 2022
                January 04 2022
                February 2022
                January 04 2022
                December 28 2021
                : 63
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, and School of Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
                [2 ]School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia
                [3 ]College of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
                [4 ]CAS Key Laboratory of Crust-Mantle Materials and Environments, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
                [5 ]CAS Center for Excellence in Comparative Planetology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
                Article
                10.1093/petrology/egab103
                54ac076a-3353-4ccb-bc5b-9031cad3feff
                © 2021

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article