4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Country differences and determinants of yield in programmatic migrant TB screening in four European countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The WHO End-TB Strategy emphasises early diagnosis and screening of tuberculosis (TB) in high-risk groups, including migrants. We analysed TB yield data from four large migrant TB screening programmes to inform TB policy.

          Methods

          We pooled routinely collected individual TB screening episode data from Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK under the EU Commission E-DETECT.TB grant, described characteristics of the screened population, and analysed TB case yield.

          Results

          We collected data on 2,302,260 screening episodes among 2,107,016 migrants, mostly among young adults (aged 18-44, 77.8%) from Asia (78%) and Africa (18%). There were 1,658 TB cases detected through screening with substantial yield variation (per 100,000), being 201.1 for Sweden (111.4-362.7), 68.9 (65.4-72.7) for the UK, 83.2 (73.3-94.4) for the Netherlands and 653.6 (445.4-958.2) in Italy. Most TB cases were notified among migrants from Asia (n=1,206, 75/100,000) or Africa (n=370, 76.4/100,000) and among asylum seekers (n=174, 131.5 per 100,000), migrants to the Netherlands (n=101, 61.9/100,000) and settlement visa migrants to the UK (n=590, 120.3/100,000).

          Conclusions

          We found considerable variation in yield across programmes, types of migrants and country of origin. This variation may be partly explained by differences in migration patterns and programmatic characteristics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Migrant tuberculosis screening in the EU/EEA: yield, coverage and limitations.

          A systematic literature review was performed with the objective of assessing the effectiveness of tuberculosis (TB) screening methods and strategies in migrants in European Union/European Economic Area (including Switzerland) countries. Extracted data on yield and coverage were used as indicators of effectiveness. Reported yields varied considerably between studies and countries. Considering only the 14 studies representative of national screening programmes, a median yield of TB disease of 0.18% (interquartile range 0.10-0.35%) was reported. The data did not indicate differences in effectiveness between the three main strategies: 1) screening at port of entry; 2) screening just after arrival in reception/holding centres; and 3) screening in the community following arrival in European Union countries. The variation seen probably reflects variation in risk factors for TB, in particular the composition of the migrants entering the country. Recommendations include the need for improved data for guiding the optimal frequency and duration of screening; assessment and improvement of cost-effectiveness; access to healthcare for migrants, including illegal migrants; ensuring a continuum of care for those screened; and consideration of screening for latent TB infection with caution. Finally, screening should be a component of a wider approach, rather than a stand-alone intervention.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Tuberculosis and latent tuberculous infection screening of migrants in Europe: comparative analysis of policies, surveillance systems and results

            Migration patterns into and within Europe have changed over the last decade. In 2015, European Union (EU) countries received over 1.2 million asylum requests, more than double the number registered in the previous year. This review compares the published literature on policies for tuberculosis (TB) and latent tuberculous infection (LTBI) screening in EU and European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries with the existing TB/LTBI screening programmes for migrants in 11 EU/EFTA countries based on a survey of policy and surveillance systems. In addition, we provide a systematic review of the literature on the yield of screening migrants for active TB and LTBI in Europe. Published studies provide limited information about screening coverage and the yield of screening evaluations in EU/EFTA countries. Furthermore, countries use different screening strategies and settings, and different definitions for coverage and yield of screening for active TB and LTBI. We recommend harmonising case definitions, reporting standards and policies for TB/LTBI screening. To achieve TB elimination targets, a European platform for multi-country data collection and analysis, sharing of countries' policies and practices, and harmonisation of migrant screening strategies is needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Choosing algorithms for TB screening: a modelling study to compare yield, predictive value and diagnostic burden

              Background To inform the choice of an appropriate screening and diagnostic algorithm for tuberculosis (TB) screening initiatives in different epidemiological settings, we compare algorithms composed of currently available methods. Methods Of twelve algorithms composed of screening for symptoms (prolonged cough or any TB symptom) and/or chest radiography abnormalities, and either sputum-smear microscopy (SSM) or Xpert MTB/RIF (XP) as confirmatory test we model algorithm outcomes and summarize the yield, number needed to screen (NNS) and positive predictive value (PPV) for different levels of TB prevalence. Results Screening for prolonged cough has low yield, 22% if confirmatory testing is by SSM and 32% if XP, and a high NNS, exceeding 1000 if TB prevalence is ≤0.5%. Due to low specificity the PPV of screening for any TB symptom followed by SSM is less than 50%, even if TB prevalence is 2%. CXR screening for TB abnormalities followed by XP has the highest case detection (87%) and lowest NNS, but is resource intensive. CXR as a second screen for symptom screen positives improves efficiency. Conclusions The ideal algorithm does not exist. The choice will be setting specific, for which this study provides guidance. Generally an algorithm composed of CXR screening followed by confirmatory testing with XP can achieve the lowest NNS and highest PPV, and is the least amenable to setting-specific variation. However resource requirements for tests and equipment may be prohibitive in some settings and a reason to opt for symptom screening and SSM. To better inform disease control programs we need empirical data to confirm the modeled yield, cost-effectiveness studies, transmission models and a better screening test. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-532) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9706389
                Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
                Int J Tuberc Lung Dis
                The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
                1027-3719
                1815-7920
                25 September 2023
                1 October 2022
                30 September 2023
                : 26
                : 10
                : 942-948
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, UK
                [2 ]Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, UK
                [3 ]KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Netherlands
                [4 ]UK Health Security Agency, UK
                [5 ]Università degli Studi di Brescia, Italy
                [6 ]National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
                [7 ]Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden
                [8 ]Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, UK
                [9 ]Universitair Medische Centra, Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Dr Dominik Zenner d.zenner@ 123456qmul.ac.uk
                [*]

                These authors share first authorship

                Article
                EMS188479
                10.5588/ijtld.22.0186
                7615138
                36163670
                54580b77-b118-472d-bff0-7586bd09e64c

                This work is licensed under a BY 4.0 International license.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                tuberculosis,screening programmes,migrants
                tuberculosis, screening programmes, migrants

                Comments

                Comment on this article