17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability.

      Science (New York, N.Y.)
      Arabs, Attitude, Consensus, Culture, Female, Humans, International Cooperation, Israel, Jews, psychology, Male, Middle Aged, Middle East, Negotiating

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Four studies showed that beliefs about whether groups have a malleable versus fixed nature affected intergroup attitudes and willingness to compromise for peace. Using a nationwide sample (N = 500) of Israeli Jews, the first study showed that a belief that groups were malleable predicted positive attitudes toward Palestinians, which in turn predicted willingness to compromise. In the remaining three studies, experimentally inducing malleable versus fixed beliefs about groups among Israeli Jews (N = 76), Palestinian citizens of Israel (N = 59), and Palestinians in the West Bank (N = 53)--without mentioning the adversary--led to more positive attitudes toward the outgroup and, in turn, increased willingness to compromise for peace.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature

          S. Kraus (1995)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Essentialist beliefs about social categories.

              This study examines beliefs about the ontological status of social categories, asking whether their members are understood to share fixed, inhering essences or natures. Forty social categories were rated on nine elements of essentialism. These elements formed two independent dimensions, representing the degrees to which categories are understood as natural kinds and as coherent entities with inhering cores ('entitativity' or reification), respectively. Reification was negatively associated with categories' evaluative status, especially among those categories understood to be natural kinds. Essentialism is not a unitary syndrome of social beliefs, and is not monolithically associated with devaluation and prejudice, but it illuminates several aspects of social categorization.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                21868627
                10.1126/science.1202925

                Chemistry
                Arabs,Attitude,Consensus,Culture,Female,Humans,International Cooperation,Israel,Jews,psychology,Male,Middle Aged,Middle East,Negotiating

                Comments

                Comment on this article