5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      HIV prevention programme cascades: insights from HIV programme monitoring for female sex workers in Kenya

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          HIV prevention cascades have emerged as a programme management and monitoring tool that outlines the sequential steps of an HIV prevention programme. We describe the application of an HIV combination prevention programme cascade framework to monitor and improve HIV prevention interventions for female sex workers (FSWs) in Kenya.

          Methods

          Two data sources were analysed: (1) annual programme outcome surveys conducted using a polling booth survey methodology in 2017 among 4393 FSWs, and (2) routine programme monitoring data collected by (a) 92 implementing partners between July 2017 and June 2018, and (b) Learning Site in Mombasa (2014 to 2015) and Nairobi (2013). We present national, sub‐national and implementing partner level cascades.

          Results

          At the national level, the population size estimates for FSW were 133,675 while the programme coverage targets were 174,073. Programme targets as denominator, during the period 2017 to 2018, 156,220 (90%) FSWs received peer education and contact, 148,713 (85%) received condoms and 83,053 (48%) received condoms as per their estimated need. At the outcome level, 92% of FSWs used condoms at the last sex with their client but 73% reported consistent condom use. Although 96% of FSWs had ever tested for HIV, 85% had tested in the last three months. Seventy‐nine per cent of the HIV‐positive FSWs were enrolled in HIV care, 73% were currently enrolled on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and 52% had attended an ART clinic in the last month. In the last six months, 48% of the FSWs had experienced police violence but 24% received violence support. National and sub‐national level cascades showed proportions of FSWs lost at each step of programme implementation and variability in programme achievement. Hotspot and sub‐population level cascades, presented as examples, demonstrate development and use of these cascades at the implementation level.

          Conclusions

          HIV prevention programme cascades, drawing on multiple data sources to provide an understanding of gaps in programme outputs and outcomes, can provide powerful information for monitoring and improving HIV prevention programmes for FSWs at all levels of implementation and decision‐making. Complexity of prevention programmes and the paucity of consistent data can pose a challenge to development of these cascades.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Community mobilization, empowerment and HIV prevention among female sex workers in south India

          Background While community mobilization has been widely endorsed as an important component of HIV prevention among vulnerable populations such as female sex workers (FSWs), there is uncertainty as to the mechanism through which it impacts upon HIV risk. We explored the hypothesis that individual and collective empowerment of FSW is an outcome of community mobilization, and we examined the means through which HIV risk and vulnerability reduction as well as personal and social transformation are achieved. Methods This study was conducted in five districts in south India, where community mobilization programs are implemented as part of the Avahan program (India AIDS Initiative) of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. We used a theoretically derived “integrated empowerment framework” to conduct a secondary analysis of a representative behavioural tracking survey conducted among 1,750 FSWs. We explored the associations between involvement with community mobilization programs, self-reported empowerment (defined as three domains including power within to represent self-esteem and confidence, power with as a measure of collective identity and solidarity, and power over as access to social entitlements, which were created using Principal Components analysis), and outcomes of HIV risk reduction and social transformation. Results In multivariate analysis, we found that engagement with HIV programs and community mobilization activities was associated with the domains of empowerment. Power within and power with were positively associated with more program contact (p < .01 and p < .001 respectively). These measures of empowerment were also associated with outcomes of “personal transformation” in terms of self-efficacy for condom and health service use (p < .001). Collective empowerment (power with others) was most strongly associated with “social transformation” variables including higher autonomy and reduced violence and coercion, particularly in districts with programs of longer duration (p < .05). Condom use with clients was associated with power with others (p < .001), while power within was associated with more condom use with regular partners (p < .01) and higher service utilization (p < .05). Conclusion These findings support the hypothesis that community mobilization has benefits for empowering FSWs both individually and collectively. HIV prevention is strengthened by improving their ability to address different psycho-social and community-level sources of their vulnerability. Future challenges include the need to develop social, political and legal contexts that support community mobilization of FSWs, and to prospectively measure the impact of combined community-level interventions on measures of empowerment as a means to HIV prevention.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            High heterogeneity of HIV-related sexual risk among transgender people in Ontario, Canada: a province-wide respondent-driven sampling survey

            Background Studies of HIV-related risk in trans (transgender, transsexual, or transitioned) people have most often involved urban convenience samples of those on the male-to-female (MTF) spectrum. Studies have detected high prevalences of HIV-related risk behaviours, self-reported HIV, and HIV seropositivity. Methods The Trans PULSE Project conducted a multi-mode survey using respondent-driven sampling to recruit 433 trans people in Ontario, Canada. Weighted estimates were calculated for HIV-related risk behaviours, HIV testing and self-reported HIV, including subgroup estimates for gender spectrum and ethno-racial groups. Results Trans people in Ontario report a wide range of sexual behaviours with a full range of partner types. High proportions – 25% of female-to-male (FTM) and 51% of MTF individuals – had not had a sex partner within the past year. Of MTFs, 19% had a past-year high-risk sexual experience, versus 7% of FTMs. The largest behavioural contributors to HIV risk were sexual behaviours some may assume trans people do not engage in: unprotected receptive genital sex for FTMs and insertive genital sex for MTFs. Overall, 46% had never been tested for HIV; lifetime testing was highest in Aboriginal trans people and lowest among non-Aboriginal racialized people. Approximately 15% of both FTM and MTF participants had engaged in sex work or exchange sex and about 2% currently work in the sex trade. Self-report of HIV prevalence was 10 times the estimated baseline prevalence for Ontario. However, given wide confidence intervals and the high proportion of trans people who had never been tested for HIV, estimating the actual prevalence was not possible. Conclusions Results suggest potentially higher than baseline levels of HIV; however low testing rates were observed and self-reported prevalences likely underestimate seroprevalence. Explicit inclusion of trans people in epidemiological surveillance statistics would provide much-needed information on incidence and prevalence. Given the wide range of sexual behaviours and partner types reported, HIV prevention programs and materials should not make assumptions regarding types of behaviours trans people do or do not engage in.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              HIV Prevention 2020: a framework for delivery and a call for action

              Although effective programmes are available and several countries have seen substantial declines in new HIV infections, progress in the reduction of adult HIV incidence has been slower than expected worldwide and many countries have not had large decreases in new infections in adults despite large reductions in paediatric infections. Reasons for slow progress include inadequate commitment, investment, focus, scale, and quality of implementation of prevention and treatment interventions. The UNAIDS-Lancet Commission on Defeating AIDS-Advancing Global Health reported that the provision of large-scale, effective HIV prevention programmes has failed and called on stakeholders to "get serious about HIV prevention". An ambitious worldwide target has been set by UNAIDS to reduce new infections below 500 000 by 2020-a 75% reduction from 2010. Models show that such a reduction requires a combination of primary prevention interventions and preventative effects of treatment. Achievement of the target will require more effective delivery of HIV prevention for sufficient coverage in populations at greatest risk of infection ensuring that interventions that have proved effective are made available, barriers to their uptake are overcome, demand is created, and use is consistent and occurs at the right scale with high coverage. This paper discusses how programmatic targets for prevention in a worldwide plan could be used to re-energise the HIV prevention approach. A management framework is proposed outlining global, regional, national, and subnational actions and is summarised in a call for action on HIV prevention for 2020.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bhattacharjee.parinita@gmail.com
                Journal
                J Int AIDS Soc
                J Int AIDS Soc
                10.1002/(ISSN)1758-2652
                JIA2
                Journal of the International AIDS Society
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1758-2652
                22 July 2019
                July 2019
                : 22
                : Suppl Suppl 4 , Maximizing the impact of HIV prevention technologies in sub‐Saharan Africa, Guest Editors: Helen Ward, Geoffrey P Garnett, Kenneth H Mayer, Gina A Dallabetta ( doiID: 10.1002/jia2.2019.22.issue-S4 )
                : e25311
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Centre for Global Public Health University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
                [ 2 ] Partners for Health and Development in Africa Nairobi Kenya
                [ 3 ] National AIDS and STI Control Programme Ministry of Health Nairobi Kenya
                [ 4 ] Department of Medicine St. Michael's Hospital University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 5 ] Institute of Medical Sciences University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 6 ] Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation Dalla Lana School of Public Health University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 7 ] Karnataka Health Promotion Trust Bangalore Karnataka India
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Corresponding author: Parinita Bhattacharjee, University of Manitoba, Geomaps Building, Upper Hill, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel: +254 721128265. ( bhattacharjee.parinita@ 123456gmail.com )
                [†]

                These authors have contributed equally to the work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3277-7693
                Article
                JIA225311
                10.1002/jia2.25311
                6643069
                31328436
                53c9acea-a60a-416b-b100-d5c54b997681
                © 2019 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 November 2018
                : 10 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 0, Pages: 8, Words: 6183
                Funding
                Funded by: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
                Award ID: FHI 360
                Funded by: Ontario HIV Treatment Network
                Funded by: Canada Research Chair
                Funded by: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF)
                Award ID: OPP‐1032367
                Funded by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
                Award ID: FDN 13455
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jia225311
                July 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.6.2 mode:remove_FC converted:22.07.2019

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                key population,hiv prevention,kenya,cascade,monitoring
                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                key population, hiv prevention, kenya, cascade, monitoring

                Comments

                Comment on this article