13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biomechanical Comparison of Screw Fixation Versus a Cortical Button and Self-tensioning Suture for the Latarjet Procedure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Metal screws are traditionally used to fix the coracoid process to the glenoid. Despite stable fixation, metal screws have been associated with hardware complications. Therefore, some studies have advocated for suture button fixation during the Latarjet procedure to reduce the complications associated with screw fixation.

          Purpose:

          To biomechanically evaluate the ultimate failure load of a cortical button and self-tensioning suture versus metal screws for coracoid graft fixation during the Latarjet procedure.

          Study Design:

          Controlled laboratory study.

          Methods:

          Eight matched pairs of fresh-frozen, male cadaveric shoulders (N = 16) underwent the Latarjet procedure. The shoulders of each pair were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: fixation using two 3.75-mm cannulated, fully threaded metal screws or fixation using a double suture button construct. Specimens were secured in a dynamic testing machine and cyclically preconditioned from 2 to 10 N at 0.1 Hz for 10 cycles. After preconditioning, specimens were pulled to failure at a normalized displacement rate of 400% of the measured gauge length per minute. The ultimate failure load and mechanism of failure were recorded for each specimen.

          Results:

          The mean ultimate load to failure for screw fixation (226 ± 114 N; 95% CI, 147-305 N) was not significantly different from that for suture button fixation (266 ± 73 N; 95% CI, 216-317 N) ( P = .257). The mean strain at failure for screw fixation (63% ± 21%; 95% CI, 48%-77%) was not significantly different from that for suture button fixation (86% ± 26%; 95% CI, 69%-104%) ( P = .060). The most common mechanism of failure for the screw fixation method was at the bone block drill holes, while an intramuscular rupture at the clamp-muscle interface occurred for the suture button construct.

          Conclusion:

          The screw and suture button fixation techniques exhibited comparable biomechanical strength for coracoid bone block fixation of the Latarjet procedure.

          Clinical Relevance:

          Metal screws have been reported to be a large contributor to intraoperative and postoperative complications. Therefore, given the results of the current study, a suture button construct may be an alternative to metal screw fixation during the Latarjet procedure. However, further clinical studies are warranted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Complications and re-operations after Bristow-Latarjet shoulder stabilization: a systematic review.

          Various methods of bony stabilization, including modifications of Bristow and Latarjet procedures, are considered gold-standard treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability but are associated with unique complications and risk of reoperation. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of these complications. We hypothesized that the Bristow-Latarjet procedure would be a successful technique for treatment of shoulder instability but associated with a risk of recurrent postoperative instability, reoperation, and other complications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            [Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder].

            M LATARJET (2015)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The incidence and characteristics of shoulder instability at the United States Military Academy.

              The literature provides little information detailing the incidence of traumatic shoulder instability in young, healthy athletes. Shoulder instability is common in young athletes. Descriptive epidemiologic study. We prospectively captured all traumatic shoulder instability events at the United States Military Academy between September 1, 2004, and May 31, 2005. Throughout this period, all new traumatic shoulder instability events were evaluated with physical examination, plain radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging. Instability events were classified according to direction, chronicity, and type (subluxation or dislocation). Subject demographics, mechanism of injury, and sport were evaluated. Among 4141 students, 117 experienced new traumatic shoulder instability events during the study period; 11 experienced multiple events. The mean age of these 117 subjects was 20.0 years; 101 students were men (86.3%), and 16 were women (13.7%). The 1-year incidence proportion was 2.8%. The male incidence proportion was 2.9% and the female incidence proportion was 2.5%. Eighteen events were dislocations (15.4%), and 99 were subluxations (84.6%). Of the 99 subluxations, 45 (45.5%) were primary events, while 54 (54.5%) were recurrent. Of the 18 dislocations, 12 (66.7%) were primary events, while 6 (33.3%) were recurrent. The majority of the 117 events were anterior in nature (80.3%), while 12 (10.3%) were posterior, and 11 (9.4%) were multidirectional. Forty-four percent (43.6%) of the instability events experienced were as a result of contact injuries, while 41.0% were a result of noncontact injuries, including 9 subluxations caused by missed punches during boxing; information was unavailable for the remaining 15%. Glenohumeral instability is a common injury in this population, with subluxations comprising 85% of instability events.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Orthop J Sports Med
                Orthop J Sports Med
                OJS
                spojs
                Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2325-9671
                14 June 2018
                June 2018
                : 6
                : 6
                : 2325967118777842
                Affiliations
                [* ]Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.
                []The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA.
                []Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
                [§ ]OSTRC, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
                [5-2325967118777842] Investigation performed at the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA
                Author notes
                [*] []Robert F. LaPrade, MD, PhD, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 1000, Vail, CO 81657, USA (email: rlaprade@ 123456thesteadmanclinic.com ).
                Article
                10.1177_2325967118777842
                10.1177/2325967118777842
                6024539
                29977940
                5346ce39-c690-41ab-ab96-004db7df5fee
                © The Author(s) 2018

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                corrected-proof

                shoulder,latarjet,conjoint tendon,anterior shoulder instability,glenoid bone loss

                Comments

                Comment on this article